skip to main content
10.1145/3627341.3630368acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccvitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Crowd Evacuation Approach Based on Optimal Transport

Published:15 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the Macro Bi-level Optimal Transport model (MBOT model) based on optimal transport theory applied to large aggregated places for crowd evacuation. Optimal transport theory bridges geometry and probability, providing a new way to model probability distributions and measure the distance between probability distributions using a geometric approach. Our approach treats the evacuated population as a set of discrete particles with probability distributions while abstracting the evacuation space into a simple geometric structure, establishing the corresponding mathematical model, and using optimal transport theory to determine the optimal evacuation plan for these particles from the initial location to a specified safe area. We introduce an evacuation cost that maximizes evacuation efficiency by optimizing that cost in two levels. We apply the proposed model to a subway station, compare our plan with the randomized evacuation plans and study the effects of evacuation crowd density, distribution and number of exits on evacuation time. The results show that our model converges to an optimal evacuation solution within an acceptable number of iterations, which can significantly improve evacuation efficiency and reduce potential risks in emergencies. The results of this paper can provide a scientific basis for planning and implementing evacuation plans for large venues and promote scientific and standardized safety management in emergencies.

References

  1. L. L. Y. Wei, A. A. A. Ibrahim, K. Nisar, Z. I. A. Ismail, and I. J. J. o. I. I. I. Welch, Survey on geographic visual display techniques in epidemiology: Taxonomy and characterization, 2020, vol. 18, p. 100139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Yi, S. Pan, and Q. Chen, Simulation of pedestrian evacuation in stampedes based on a cellular automaton model, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2020, vol. 104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. R. Zhou, Y. Cui, Y. Wang, and J. Jiang, A modified social force model with different categories of pedestrians for subway station evacuation, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2021, vol. 110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. Miyagawa and G. Ichinose, Cellular automaton model with turning behavior in crowd evacuation, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2020, vol. 549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. H.-h. Tian, Y.-f. Wei, L.-y. Dong, Y. Xue, and R.-s. Zheng, Resolution of conflicts in cellular automaton evacuation model with the game-theory, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2018, vol. 503, pp. 991-1006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Hu, L. You, H. Zhang, J. Wei, and Y. Guo, Study on queueing behavior in pedestrian evacuation by extended cellular automata model, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2018, vol. 489, pp. 112-127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. T. Kretz, J. Lohmiller, and P. J. T. r. r. Sukennik, Some indications on how to calibrate the social force model of pedestrian dynamics, 2018, vol. 2672, no. 20, pp. 228-238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Q. Liu, A social force model for the crowd evacuation in a terrorist attack, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2018, vol. 502, pp. 315-330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. W. Zeng, P. Chen, H. Nakamura, and M. J. T. r. p. C. e. t. Iryo-Asano, Application of social force model to pedestrian behavior analysis at signalized crosswalk, 2014, vol. 40, pp. 143-159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. E. N. Cirillo, M. Colangeli, A. Muntean, and T. J. a. p. a. Thieu, A lattice model for active–passive pedestrian dynamics: a quest for drafting effects, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. X. Guo, J. Chen, Y. Zheng, J. J. P. A. S. M. Wei, and i. Applications, A heterogeneous lattice gas model for simulating pedestrian evacuation, 2012, vol. 391, no. 3, pp. 582-592.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Han, J. Zhang, and R. Jiang, Application of Extended Lattice Gas Automata Model in Ship Evacuation Simulation, Mobile Information Systems. 2021, vol. 2021, p. 6335388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. W. Zhang and Z. Yao, "A reformed lattice gas model and its application in the simulation of evacuation in hospital fire," in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2010, pp. 1543-1547: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. P. Cimellaro, S. Mahin, and M. Domaneschi, Integrating a Human Behavior Model within an Agent-Based Approach for Blasting Evacuation, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2019, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 3-20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. D'Orazio, L. Spalazzi, E. Quagliarini, and G. J. S. s. Bernardini, Agent-based model for earthquake pedestrians’ evacuation in urban outdoor scenarios: Behavioural patterns definition and evacuation paths choice, 2014, vol. 62, pp. 450-465.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. H. Wang, A. Mostafizi, L. A. Cramer, D. Cox, and H. J. T. R. P. C. E. T. Park, An agent-based model of a multimodal near-field tsunami evacuation: Decision-making and life safety, 2016, vol. 64, pp. 86-100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Kerrache and Y. Nakauchi, "Computing constrained energy-minimizing flows," in 2011 3rd International Conference on Computer Research and Development, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 352-356: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. P. Hoogendoorn, F. van Wageningen-Kessels, W. Daamen, D. C. Duives, and M. Sarvi, Continuum theory for pedestrian traffic flow: Local route choice modelling and its implications, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2015, vol. 59, pp. 183-197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Y. Han, H. Liu, P. J. S. M. P. Moore, and Theory, Extended route choice model based on available evacuation route set and its application in crowd evacuation simulation, 2017, vol. 75, pp. 1-16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. H. Kim and S. Han, Crowd evacuation simulation using active route choice model based on human characteristics, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2018, vol. 87, pp. 369-378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. A. Genevay, G. Peyré, and M. Cuturi, "Learning generative models with sinkhorn divergences," in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2018, pp. 1608-1617: PMLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Z. Ge, S. Liu, Z. Li, O. Yoshie, and J. Sun, "Ota: Optimal transport assignment for object detection," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 303-312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. V. Seguy, B. B. Damodaran, R. Flamary, N. Courty, A. Rolet, and M. J. a. p. a. Blondel, Large-scale optimal transport and mapping estimation, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. T. Van Vu and K. J. P. R. X. Saito, Thermodynamic unification of optimal transport: Thermodynamic uncertainty relation, minimum dissipation, and thermodynamic speed limits, 2023, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 011013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. G. Buttazzo, C. Jimenez, and E. Oudet, An Optimization Problem for Mass Transportation with Congested Dynamics, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization. 2009, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1961-1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S. Kerrache, H. Benhidour, and S. Al-Homaidhi, "An Optimal Transport-Based Approach for Crowd Evacuation," in 2013 Fifth International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation, 2013, pp. 142-147: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. G. J. M. M. P. A. R. S. Monge, Mémoire sur la théorie des déblais et des remblais, 1781, pp. 666-704.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Y. J. C. o. p. Brenier and a. mathematics, Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector‐valued functions, 1991, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 375-417.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. M. Arjovsky, S. Chintala, and L. Bottou, "Wasserstein generative adversarial networks," in International conference on machine learning, 2017, pp. 214-223: PMLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. M. J. A. i. n. i. p. s. Cuturi, Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport, 2013, vol. 26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. A. Abdelghany, H. Mahmassani, K. Abdelghany, H. Al-Ahmadi, and W. J. S. Alhalabi, Incidents in high-volume elongated crowd facilities: A simulation-based study, 2019, vol. 95, no. 9, pp. 823-843.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Crowd Evacuation Approach Based on Optimal Transport
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ICCVIT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Computer, Vision and Intelligent Technology
              August 2023
              378 pages
              ISBN:9798400708701
              DOI:10.1145/3627341

              Copyright © 2023 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 15 December 2023

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              ICCVIT '23 Paper Acceptance Rate54of142submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate54of142submissions,38%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format