skip to main content
research-article
Results Reproduced / v1.1

Shrink & Morph: 3D-Printed Self-Shaping Shells Actuated by a Shape Memory Effect

Published:05 December 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

While 3D printing enables the customization and home fabrication of a wide range of shapes, fabricating freeform thin-shells remains challenging. As layers misalign with the curvature, they incur structural deficiencies, while the curved shells require large support structures, typically using more material than the part itself.

We present a computational framework for optimizing the internal structure of 3D printed plates such that they morph into a desired freeform shell when heated. This exploits the shrinkage effect of thermoplastics such as PLA, which store internal stresses along the deposition directions. These stresses get released when the material is heated again above its glass transition temperature, causing an anisotropic deformation that induces curvature.

Our inverse design method takes as input a freeform surface and finds an optimized set of deposition trajectories in each layer such that their anisotropic shrinkage deforms the plate into the prescribed surface geometry. We optimize for a continuous vector field that varies across the plate and within its thickness. The algorithm then extracts a set of deposition trajectories from the vector field in order to fabricate the flat plates on standard FFF printers. We validate our algorithm on freeform, doubly-curved surfaces.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

papers_721s4-file3.mp4

mp4

142.3 MB

References

  1. Hillel Aharoni, Yu Xia, Xinyue Zhang, Randall D. Kamien, and Shu Yang. 2018. Universal inverse design of surfaces with thin nematic elastomer sheets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 28 (2018), 7206--7211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Byoungkwon An, Ye Tao, Jianzhe Gu, Tingyu Cheng, Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Wei Zhao, Youngwook Do, Shigeo Takahashi, Hsiang-Yun Wu, Teng Zhang, and Lining Yao. 2018. Thermorph: Democratizing 4D Printing of Self-Folding Materials and Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dilip Chalissery, Dennis Schönfeld, Mario Walter, Inga Shklyar, Heiko Andrae, Christoph Schwörer, Tobias Amann, Linda Weisheit, and Thorsten Pretsch. 2022. Highly Shrinkable Objects as Obtained from 4D Printing. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 307, 1 (2022). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Hsiao-Yu Chen, Arnav Sastry, Wim M. van Rees, and Etienne Vouga. 2018. Physical Simulation of Environmentally Induced Thin Shell Deformation. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 4, Article 146 (July 2018), 13 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tian Chen, Julian Panetta, Max Schnaubelt, and Mark Pauly. 2021. Bistable Auxetic Surface Structures. ACM Trans. Graph. 40, 4, Article 39 (July 2021), 9 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tiffany Cheng, Dylan Wood, Laura Kiesewetter, Eda Özdemir, Karen Antorveza, and Achim Menges. 2021. Programming material compliance and actuation: Hybrid additive fabrication of biocomposite structures for large-scale self-shaping. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 16, 5 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Himani Deshpande, Clement Zheng, Courtney Starrett, Jinsil Hwaryoung Seo, and Jeeeun Kim. 2022. Fab4D: An Accessible Hybrid Approach for Programmable Shaping and Shape Changing Artifacts. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '22). Article 70, 7 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Efi Efrati, Eran Sharon, and Raz Kupferman. 2009. Elastic theory of unconstrained non-Euclidean plates. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 57, 4 (2009), 762--775. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Sydney Gladman, Elisabetta A. Matsumoto, Ralph G. Nuzzo, L. Mahadevan, and Jennifer A. Lewis. 2016. Biomimetic 4D Printing. Nature Materials 15 (2016), 413--419. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Itay Griniasty, Hillel Aharoni, and Efi Efrati. 2019. Curved Geometries from Planar Director Fields: Solving the Two-Dimensional Inverse Problem. Physical Review Letters 123 (Sept. 2019), 5 pages. Issue 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Eitan Grinspun, Yotam Gingold, Jason Reisman, and Denis Zorin. 2006. Computing discrete shape operators on general meshes. 25, 3 (2006), 547--556. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Carsten Griwodz, Simone Gasparini, Lilian Calvet, Pierre Gurdjos, Fabien Castan, Benoit Maujean, Gregoire De Lillo, and Yann Lanthony. 2021. AliceVision Meshroom: An open-source 3D reconstruction pipeline. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference - MMSys '21. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Philippe Grönquist, Dylan Wood, Mohammad M Hassani, Falk K Wittel, Achim Menges, and Markus Rüggeberg. 2019. Analysis of hygroscopic self-shaping wood at large scale for curved mass timber structures. Science Advances 5, 9 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jianzhe Gu, David E. Breen, Jenny Hu, Lifeng Zhu, Ye Tao, Tyson Van de Zande, Guanyun Wang, Yongjie Jessica Zhang, and Lining Yao. 2019. Geodesy: Self-Rising 2.5D Tiles by Printing along 2D Geodesic Closed Path. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jianzhe Gu, Vidya Narayanan, Guanyun Wang, Danli Luo, Harshika Jain, Kexin Lu, Fang Qin, Sijia Wang, James McCann, and Lining Yao. 2020. Inverse Design Tool for Asymmetrical Self-Rising Surfaces with Color Texture. In Symposium on Computational Fabrication (SCF '20). 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ruslan Guseinov, Connor McMahan, Jesús Pérez, Chiara Daraio, and Bernd Bickel. 2020. Programming temporal morphing of self-actuated shells. Nature Communications 11, Article 237 (Dec. 2020). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ruslan Guseinov, Eder Miguel, and Bernd Bickel. 2017. CurveUps: Shaping Objects from Flat Plates with Tension-Actuated Curvature. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4, Article 64 (July 2017), 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Freddie Hong, Steve Hodges, Connor Myant, and David E Boyle. 2022. Open5x: Accessible 5-Axis 3D Printing and Conformal Slicing. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '22). Article 399, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Alec Jacobson, Daniele Panozzo, et al. 2018. libigl: A simple C++ geometry processing library. https://libigl.github.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. David Jourdan, Mélina Skouras, Etienne Vouga, and Adrien Bousseau. 2022. Computational Design of Self-Actuated Surfaces by Printing Plastic Ribbons on Stretched Fabric. Computer Graphics Forum 41, 2 (2022), 493--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lukas Kačergis, Rytis Mitkus, and Michael Sinapius. 2019. Influence of fused deposition modeling process parameters on the transformation of 4D printed morphing structures. Smart Materials and Structures 28, 10 (Sept. 2019), 105042. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jungwook Kim, James A. Hanna, Myunghwan Byun, Christian D. Santangelo, and Ryan C. Hayward. 2012. Designing Responsive Buckled Surfaces by Halftone Gel Lithography. Science 335, 6073 (2012), 1201--1205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Felix Knöppel, Keenan Crane, Ulrich Pinkall, and Peter Schröder. 2013. Globally optimal direction fields. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4, Article 59 (July 2013), 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Felix Knöppel, Keenan Crane, Ulrich Pinkall, and Peter Schröder. 2015. Stripe Patterns on Surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, Article 39 (July 2015), 10 pages. Issue 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mina Konaković, Keenan Crane, Bailin Deng, Sofien Bouaziz, Daniel Piker, and Mark Pauly. 2016. Beyond Developable: Computational Design and Fabrication with Auxetic Materials. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 4, Article 89 (July 2016), 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mina Konaković-Luković, Julian Panetta, Keenan Crane, and Mark Pauly. 2018. Rapid Deployment of Curved Surfaces via Programmable Auxetics. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 4, Article 106 (July 2018), 13 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Yijing Li and Jernej Barbic. 2014. Stable Orthotropic Materials. In Symposium on Computer Animation. 41--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ligang Liu, Lei Zhang, Yin Xu, Craig Gotsman, and Steven J. Gortler. 2008. A Local/Global Approach to Mesh Parameterization. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Geometry Processing (SGP '08). 1495--1504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kongpyung (Justin) Moon, Haeun Lee, Jeeeun Kim, and Andrea Bianchi. 2022. Shrink-Cells: Localized and Sequential Shape-Changing Actuation of 3D-Printed Objects via Selective Heating. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '22). Article 86, 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jun-Hee Na, Nakul P. Bende, Jinhye Bae, Christian D. Santangelo, and Ryan C. Hayward. 2016. Grayscale gel lithography for programmed buckling of non-Euclidean hydrogel plates. Soft Matter 12 (2016), 4985--4990. Issue 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Julian Panetta, Florin Isvoranu, Tian Chen, Emmanuel Siéfert, Benoît Roman, and Mark Pauly. 2021. Computational Inverse Design of Surface-Based Inflatables. ACM Trans. Graph. 40, 4 (July 2021), 14 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jesús Pérez, Miguel A. Otaduy, and Bernhard Thomaszewski. 2017. Computational Design and Automated Fabrication of Kirchhoff-Plateau Surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4, Article 62 (July 2017), 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Laurent Perron and Vincent Furnon. 2023. OR-Tools v9.6. Google. https://developers.google.com/optimization/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Matteo Pezzulla, Norbert Stoop, Xin Jiang, and Douglas Holmes. 2017. Curvature-driven morphing of non-Euclidean shells. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 473, 2201 (May 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Abishera Ravichandra Rajkumar and Kumar Shanmugam. 2018. Additive manufacturing-enabled shape transformations via FFF 4D printing. Journal of Materials Research 33, 24 (2018), 4362--4376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Johannes Schindelin, Ignacio Arganda-Carreras, Erwin Frise, Verena Kaynig, Mark Longair, Tobias Pietzsch, Stephan Preibisch, Curtis Rueden, Stephan Saalfeld, Benjamin Schmid, et al. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature methods 9, 7 (2012), 676--682.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Patrick Schmidt, Janis Born, David Bommes, Marcel Campen, and Leif Kobbelt. 2022. TinyAD: Automatic Differentiation in Geometry Processing Made Simple. Computer Graphics Forum 41, 5 (2022), 113--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Nicholas Sharp et al. 2019b. Polyscope. www.polyscope.run.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Nicholas Sharp, Keenan Crane, et al. 2019a. GeometryCentral: A modern C++ library of data structures and algorithms for geometry processing. https://geometry-central.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Georg Sperl, Rahul Narain, and Chris Wojtan. 2020. Homogenized Yarn-Level Cloth. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 4, Article 48 (Aug. 2020), 16 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lingyun Sun, Yue Yang, Yu Chen, Jiaji Li, Danli Luo, Haolin Liu, Lining Yao, Ye Tao, and Guanyun Wang. 2021. ShrinCage: 4D Printing Accessories That Self-Adapt. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). Article 433, 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Ye Tao, Youngwook Do, Humphrey Yang, Yi-Chin Lee, Guanyun Wang, Catherine Mondoa, Jianxun Cui, Wen Wang, and Lining Yao. 2019. Morphlour: Personalized Flour-Based Morphing Food Induced by Dehydration or Hydration Method. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '19). 329--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ye Tao, Yi-Chin Lee, Haolin Liu, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Jianxun Cui, Catherine Mondoa, Mahnoush Babaei, Jasio Santillan, Guanyun Wang, Danli Luo, et al. 2021. Morphing pasta and beyond. Science Advances 7, 19 (May 2021). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Teunis van Manen, Shahram Janbaz, and Amir A. Zadpoor. 2017. Programming 2D/3D shape-shifting with hobbyist 3D printers. Materials Horizons 4 (2017), 1064--1069. Issue 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Guanyun Wang, Ye Tao, Ozguc Bertug Capunaman, Humphrey Yang, and Lining Yao. 2019. A-Line: 4D Printing Morphing Linear Composite Structures. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Guanyun Wang, Humphrey Yang, Zeyu Yan, Nurcan Gecer Ulu, Ye Tao, Jianzhe Gu, Levent Burak Kara, and Lining Yao. 2018. 4DMesh: 4D Printing Morphing Non-Developable Mesh Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '18). 623--635. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Wen Wang, Lining Yao, Teng Zhang, Chin-Yi Cheng, Daniel Levine, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2017. Transformative Appetite: Shape-Changing Food Transforms from 2D to 3D by Water Interaction through Cooking. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). 6123--6132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Clarisse Weischedel. 2012. A discrete geometric view on shear-deformable shell models. Ph. D. Dissertation. Georg August Universität Göttingen. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Yuxuan Yu, Haolin Liu, Kuanren Qian, Humphrey Yang, Matthew McGehee, Jianzhe Gu, Danli Luo, Lining Yao, and Yongjie Jessica Zhang. 2020. Material characterization and precise finite element analysis of fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites for 4D printing. Computer-Aided Design 122 (2020). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Jonas Zehnder, Stelian Coros, and Bernhard Thomaszewski. 2021. SGN: Sparse Gauss-Newton for Accelerated Sensitivity Analysis. ACM Trans. Graph. 41, 1, Article 4 (Sept. 2021), 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Quan Zhang, Dong Yan, Kai Zhang, and Gengkai Hu. 2015. Pattern Transformation of Heat-Shrinkable Polymer by Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Technique. Scientific Reports 5, Article 8936 (March 2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Tianyu Zhang, Guoxin Fang, Yuming Huang, Neelotpal Dutta, Sylvain Lefebvre, Zekai Murat Kilic, and Charlie C. L. Wang. 2022. S3-Slicer: A General Slicing Framework for Multi-Axis 3D Printing. ACM Trans. Graph. 41, 6, Article 277 (Nov. 2022), 15 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Shrink & Morph: 3D-Printed Self-Shaping Shells Actuated by a Shape Memory Effect

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
        ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 42, Issue 6
        December 2023
        1565 pages
        ISSN:0730-0301
        EISSN:1557-7368
        DOI:10.1145/3632123
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 December 2023
        Published in tog Volume 42, Issue 6

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)170
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)56

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader