skip to main content
10.1145/3616391.3622767acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

GNB-RPL: Gaussian Naïve Bayes for RPL Routing Protocol in Smart Grid Communications

Published:30 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the potential of utilizing the Gaussian Naive Bayes algorithm for enhancing the performance of the Wireless Smart Grid Networks (WSGNs). We have incorporated the Gaussian Naive Bayes algorithm into the widely used Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL), resulting in an advanced variant named as GNB-RPL. This innovative protocol leverages the Naive Bayes algorithm to optimize routing decisions. Training a Naive Bayes classifier model on a data set of routing metrics enables us to make predictions about the probability of successfully reaching a destination node. Each network node utilizes this classifier to select the route with the highest probability of delivering packets effectively. Our findings demonstrate that GNB-RPL significantly enhances the packet delivery ratio while minimizing end-to-end delay through a comprehensive performance evaluation conducted in a realistic scenario and across different traffic loads. These results show the potential of GNB-RPL as a promising solution for achieving greater efficiency in WSGNs.

References

  1. Pedro David Acevedo, Daladier Jabba, Paul Sanmartin, Sebastian Valle, and Elias D. Nino-Ruiz. 2021. WRF-RPL: Weighted Random Forward RPL for High Traffic and Energy Demanding Scenarios. IEEE Access , Vol. 9 (2021), 60163--60174. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3074436Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Roger Alexander, Anders Brandt, JP Vasseur, Jonathan Hui, Kris Pister, Pascal Thubert, P Levis, Rene Struik, Richard Kelsey, and Tim Winter. 2012. RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks. RFC 6550. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6550Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Khadak Singh Bhandari, In Ho Ra, and Gihwan Cho. 2020. Multi-Topology Based QoS-Differentiation in RPL for Internet of Things Applications. IEEE Access , Vol. 8 (2020), 96686--96705. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995794Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Carlos Lester Duenas Santos, Juan Pablo Astudillo León, Ahmad Mohamad Mezher, Julian Cardenas Barrera, Julian Meng, and Eduardo Castillo Guerra. 2022. RPL: An Improved Parent Selection Strategy for RPL in Wireless Smart Grid Networks. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) (PE-WASUN '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 75--82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3551663.3558677Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Abdelhadi Eloudrhiri Hassani, Aicha Sahel, and Abdelmajid Badri. 2021. IRH-OF: A New Objective Function for RPL Routing Protocol in IoT Applications. Wirel. Pers. Commun. , Vol. 119, 1 (jul 2021), 673--689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08230--8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Peter I. Frazier. 2018. A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization. arxiv: 1807.02811 [stat.ML]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Baraq Ghaleb, Ahmed Y. Al-Dubai, Elias Ekonomou, Ayoub Alsarhan, Youssef Nasser, Lewis M. Mackenzie, and Azzedine Boukerche. 2019. A Survey of Limitations and Enhancements of the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks: A Focus on Core Operations. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, Vol. 21, 2 (2019), 1607--1635. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2874356Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Wail Mardini, Shadi Aljawarneh, and Amnah Al-Abdi. 2021. Using Multiple RPL Instances to Enhance the Performance of New 6G and Internet of Everything (6G/IoE)-Based Healthcare Monitoring Systems. Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol. 26, 3 (2021), 952--968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01662--9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Arslan Musaddiq, Yousaf Bin Zikria, Zulqarnain, and Sung Won Kim. 2020. Routing protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks for heterogeneous traffic network. Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, Vol. 2020, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-020--1645--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Levis O. Gnawali. 2012. The Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function. RFC 6719 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ed. P. Thubert. 2012. Objective Function Zero for the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL). RFC 6552 (2012), 5--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K Pister, N Dejean, and D Barthel. 2012. Routing metrics used for path calculation in low-power and lossy networks. RFC , Vol. 6551 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Alexander T. Winter, P. Thubert, A. Brandt, J. Hui, R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik, JP. Vasseur. 2012. RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks. RFC 6550 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Alaa Tharwat. 2020. Classification assessment methods. Applied Computing and Informatics (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. András Varga. 2018. OMNeT Discrete Event Simulator. https://www.omnetp.org Retrieved June 9, 2018 from ioGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. GNB-RPL: Gaussian Naïve Bayes for RPL Routing Protocol in Smart Grid Communications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      Q2SWinet '23: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Symposium on QoS and Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks
      October 2023
      121 pages
      ISBN:9798400703683
      DOI:10.1145/3616391
      • General Chair:
      • Ahmed Mostefaoui,
      • Program Chair:
      • Peng Sun

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate46of131submissions,35%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader