skip to main content
10.1145/3615888.3627812acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring The Use of OpenStreetMap Data (OSM) and GPS Traces for Validating Driving Routes and Identifying Prohibited Maneuvers in Direction Services

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

As people increasingly adopt a more flexible and mobile way of living, map applications and navigation services have gained increasingly in importance. In order for these services to be useful to their users, their providers need to ensure and maintain a high quality in terms of accuracy and reliability. Keeping track of the service quality is essential, especially in a dynamic domain like this, where the underlying road network data might change from one day to the next due for instance to temporal road closures or turn restrictions. Although the changes might be small and local, they can still have a big impact on the routing quality of direction services. The focus of this study lies on providing the means to avoid such high-impact scenarios in a cost-efficient manner. In particular, we focus on the legality aspect of routes that reflects the degree of prohibited by law maneuvers within a suggested route. First, we define a set of appropriate sample-based metrics to help us track a route's legality. Then, we introduce an automated pipeline based on OSM data and GPS traces that is able to support and reduce the load of our human judges to identify illegal maneuvers in a sample of candidate routes. Finally, we evaluate our pipeline using a random sample of 1,306 US routes while a local map data provider as well as human judgement via visual inspection serve as our ground truth. Our results show that our method is able to sufficiently cover most of the route sections in our candidate route samples and identify 90% of all illegal maneuvers while reducing the load of manual human judgement by 86%.

References

  1. Ayush Bandil, Vaishali Girdhar, Hieu Chau, Mohamed Ali, Abdeltawab Hendawi, Harsh Govind, Peiwei Cao, and Ashley Song. 2021. GeoDart: A System for Discovering Maps Discrepancies. In 2021 IEEE 37th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 2535--2546.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayush Bandil, Vaishali Girdhar, Kivanc Dincer, Harsh Govind, Peiwei Cao, Ashley Song, and Mohamed Ali. 2020. An interactive system to compare, explore and identify discrepancies across map providers. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 425--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Favyen Bastani, Songtao He, Satvat Jagwani, Edward Park, Sofiane Abbar, Mohammad Alizadeh, Hari Balakrishnan, Sanjay Chawla, Sam Madden, and Mohammad Amin Sadeghi. 2021. Inferring and improving street maps with data-driven automation. Commun. ACM 64, 11 (2021), 109--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. James Biagioni and Jakob Eriksson. 2012. Inferring road maps from GPS traces: Survey and comparative evaluation. Transportation Research Board, 91st Annual 2291 (2012), 61--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lili Cao and John Krumm. 2009. From GPS traces to a routable road map. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems. 3--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Alexandros Efentakis, Sotiris Brakatsoulas, Nikos Grivas, and Dieter Pfoser. 2014. Crowdsourcing turning restrictions for OpenStreetMap.. In EDBT/ICDT Workshops. 355--362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Alireza Fathi and John Krumm. 2010. Detecting road intersections from GPS traces. In Geographic Information Science: 6th International Conference, GIScience 2010, Zurich, Switzerland, September 14-17, 2010. Proceedings 6. Springer, 56--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Andrew J Flanagin and Miriam J Metzger. 2008. The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 72 (2008), 137--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Michael F Goodchild. 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69 (2007), 211--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Anita Graser, Markus Straub, and Melitta Dragaschnig. 2015. Is OSM good enough for vehicle routing? A study comparing street networks in Vienna. Progress in Location-Based Services 2014 (2015), 3--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Antonios Karatzoglou. 2022. Applying network kernel density estimation (NKDE) and temporal network kernel estimation (TNKDE) for generating safer routes. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Xuemei Liu, James Biagioni, Jakob Eriksson, Yin Wang, George Forman, and Yanmin Zhu. 2012. Mining large-scale, sparse GPS traces for map inference: comparison of approaches. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 669--677.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Paul Newson and John Krumm. 2009. Hidden Markov map matching through noise and sparseness. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems. 336--343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Seth Rogers, Pat Langley, and Christopher Wilson. 1999. Mining GPS data to augment road models. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 104--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Martin Schmidl, Gerhard Navratil, and Ioannis Giannopoulos. 2021. An Approach to Assess the Effect of Currentness of Spatial Data on Routing Quality. AGILE: GIScience Series 2 (2021), 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Stefan Schroedl, Kiri Wagstaff, Seth Rogers, Pat Langley, and Christopher Wilson. 2004. Mining GPS traces for map refinement. Data mining and knowledge Discovery 9 (2004), 59--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohamad Tavakoli et al. 1982. Building and Road Extraction from Aerial Photographs. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 12, 1 (1982), 84--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Yin Wang, Xuemei Liu, Hong Wei, George Forman, Chao Chen, and Yanmin Zhu. 2013. Crowdatlas: Self-updating maps for cloud and personal use. In Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. 27--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yifang Yin, Jagannadan Varadarajan, Guanfeng Wang, Xueou Wang, Dhruva Sahrawat, Roger Zimmermann, and See-Kiong Ng. 2020. A multi-task learning framework for road attribute updating via joint analysis of map data and GPS traces. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 2662--2668.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lijuan Zhang, Frank Thiemann, and Monika Sester. 2010. Integration of GPS traces with road map. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science. 17--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yanmin Zhu, Yin Wang, George Forman, and Hong Wei. 2015. Mining large-scale GPS streams for connectivity refinement of road maps. Comput. J. 58, 9 (2015), 2109--2119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring The Use of OpenStreetMap Data (OSM) and GPS Traces for Validating Driving Routes and Identifying Prohibited Maneuvers in Direction Services

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              GeoIndustry '23: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Spatial Big Data and AI for Industrial Applications
              November 2023
              59 pages
              ISBN:9798400703508
              DOI:10.1145/3615888

              Copyright © 2023 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 20 November 2023

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader