skip to main content
10.1145/3614008.3614050acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Overview on Containment Control of Multi-agent Systems

Published:17 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently, multi-agent systems have been widely applied to navigation, military simulation, transportation control, intelligent robotics, and other fields due to their great effectiveness, fault tolerance, and robustness. This paper firstly introduces the definition and development history of containment control for multi-agent systems, and briefly reviews some common containment control approaches. Then, the recent developments in containment control of multi-agent systems are summarized from the perspective of different convergence time. Furthermore, the future prospects and directions of containment control in multi-agent systems are summarized.

References

  1. Sun H, Liu Y, Li F, and Niu X. 2019. Distributed LOR optimal protocol for leader-following consensus[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 49(9): 3532-3546.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Sun H, Liu Y and Li F. 2021. Optimal consensus via distributed protocol for second-order multi-agent systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(10): 6218-6228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. McKee G, Varghese B and Alexandrov V. 2010. A Transition from Traditional Checkpointing towards Multi-Agent based Approaches[J]. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 2(5): 701-705.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Viswacheda D. V., Anthony P, Chang R, and On C. K. 2012. Development of a Semantic Multi-Agent Based Intelligent Ethical Wealth Management Planner[J]. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 4(6): 876-879.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Berrich J, Bouchentouf T, and Benazzi A. 2012. Integration of a Multi-Agent Systems Based on Organization to Validate the Exercises Realized by Learner in an e-Learning Platform[J]. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 4(2): 177-180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Nguyen G. C, Hien D. 2016. Distributed Algorithm for Incrementally Solving the Decoupled Multi-agent Simple Temporal Problem[J]. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 8(6): 475-481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Vaughan R, Sumpter N, Henderson J, Frost A, and Cameron S. 2000. Experiments in automatic flock control[J]. Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 31(1-2): 109–117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrari-Trecate G, Egerstedt M, Buffa A, and Ji M. Laplacian sheep: A hybrid, stop-go policy for leader-based containment control[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, 2006: 212–226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimarogonas D. V, Egerstedt M. and Kyriakopoulos K. J. 2006. A leader-based containment control strategy for multiple unicycles[C]//Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 5968–5973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ji M, Ferrari-Trecate G, Egerstedt M, and Buffa A. 2008. Containment control in mobile networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 53(8): 1972–1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Cao Y, Ren W. 2009. Containment control with multiple stationary or dynamic leaders under a directed interaction graph[C]//Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference, 3014–3019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cao Y, Stuart D, Ren W, and Meng Z. 2011. Distributed containment control for multiple autonomous vehicles with double-integrator dynamics: algorithms and experiments[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 19(4): 929–938.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Notarstefano G, Egerstedt M, Haque M. 2011. Containment in leader-follower networks with switching communication topologies[J]. Automatica, 47(5): 1035–1040.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Mei, Ren W, and Ma G. 2012. Distributed containment control for Lagrangian networks with parametric uncertainties under a directed graph[J]. Automatica, 48(4): 653–659.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Liu H, Xie G, Wang L. 2012. Necessary and sufficient conditions for containment control of networked multi-agent systems[J]. Automatica, 48(7): 1415–1422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Z. Peng, D. Wang, and J. Wang. 2014. Containment control of networked autonomous underwater vehicles guided by multiple leaders using predictor-based neural DSC approach[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing, 360–365.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Peng Z, Wang D, Shi Y, Wang H, and Wang W. 2015. Containment control of networked autonomous underwater vehicles with model uncertainty and ocean disturbances guided by multiple leaders[J]. Information Sciences, 316(20): 163–179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Peng Z, Wang J. and Wang D. 2017. Containment maneuvering of marine surface vehicles with multiple parameterized paths via spatial-temporal decoupling[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 22(2): 1026–1036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ma J, Zhu Q, Liu Z. and Liu K. 2018. Containment control for a group of underactuated marine surface vehicles[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 6099–6105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Z, Hou H, and Wang Y. 2022. Formation-containment control of multiple underactuated surface vessels with sampling communication via hierarchical sliding mode approach[J]. ISA Transactions, 124: 458–467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Yoo S, Park B. 2017. Guaranteed performance design for distributed bounded containment control of networked uncertain underactuated surface vessels[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 354(3): 1584–1602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Qu Y, Zhao W, Yu Z, and B. Xiao. Distributed prescribed performance containment control for unmanned surface vehicles based on disturbance observer[J]. ISA transactions, 2022, 125: 699–706.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu X, Wu Y, Wang Z, and Cao H. 2020. Cluster containment control algorithm for unmanned surface vehicle with internal collision avoidance function based on potential energy function[C]//Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Unmanned Systems, 263–267.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Gu N, Wang D, Peng Z, and Liu L. 2021. Observer-based finite-time control for distributed path maneuvering of underactuated unmanned surface vehicles with collision avoidance and connectivity preservation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(8): 5105–5115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Guan W, Peng H, Zhang X and Sun H. 2022. Ship steering adaptive CGS control based on EKF identification method[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(2): 294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Liu S, Xie L, and Zhang H. 2013. Mean square containment control of multi-agent systems with transmission noises[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 39(11): 1787–1795.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu S, Xie L. and Zhang H. 2013. Mean square formation and containment control of multi-agent systems under noisy measurements[C]//Proceedings of the 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2181–2186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Y, Cheng L, Hou Z, Tan M, and Wang M. 2014. Containment control of multi-agent systems in a noisy communication environment[J]. Automatica, 50(7): 1922–1928.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Cheng L, Wang Y, Ren W, Hou Z. and Tan M. 2016. Containment control of multiagent systems with dynamic leaders based on a PIn-Type Approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 46(12): 3004–3017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Li B, Cheng Z, Liu Z, and Zhang Q. 2015. Containment control of discrete-time multi-agent systems with multiple stationary leaders and time-delays[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 34th Chinese Control Conference, 7062–7066.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zheng B, Zhang Y, Mu X. 2017. Mean square containment control of second-order discrete-time multi-agent systems with markovian switching topologies and interval time-varying delays[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 47(16): 140–148,.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mu X, Zheng B. 2015. Containment control of second-order discrete-time multi-agent systems with markovian missing data[J]. IET Control Theory and Applications, 9(8):1229–1237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Cortés J. 2006. Finite-time convergent gradient flows with applications to network consensus[J]. Automatica, 42(11): 1993–2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Zhao Y. and Liu Y. 2017. Specified finite-time containment tracking for multiple high-order linear multi-agent systems[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 36th Chinese Control Conference, 8536–8541.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu Z, Zhan X, Han T, and Yan H. 2022. Distributed adaptive finite-time bipartite containment control of linear multi-agent systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 69(11): 4354–4358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Zhao Y, Duan Z, Wen G, and Zhang Y. 2012. Distributed finite-time containment control for second-order multi-agent systems[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 31st Chinese Control Conference, 25–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Zheng S, Yan Z, Ji Y. and Ma C. 2022. Finite-time containment coordination of multi-agent systems with time-dependent switching topologies[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 41st Chinese Control Conference, 4684–4687.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. He Q, Tang Z, Huang D, and Yang Y. 2017. Containment control of nonlinear multi-agent systems with directed switching topologies[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 17(16): 254–258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang F, Chen Y. 2021. Fuzzy adaptive containment control for nonlinear nonaffine pure-feedback multiagent systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(10): 2878–2889.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Wang W, Tong S. 2019. Observer-based adaptive fuzzy containment control for multiple uncertain nonlinear systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27(11): 2079–2089.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Dong X, Shi Z, Geng L, and Zhong Y. S. 2013. Output containment analysis and design for high-order linear time-invariant swarm systems[J]. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 25(6): 900–913.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Chen L, Li C, Sun Y, Ma G. and Wang W. 2016. Adaptive formation-containment control for multiple Euler-Lagrange systems with uncertainties and disturbances[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference, 10690–10695.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Li K, Hua C, and Guan X. 2021. Distributed containment control for nonlinear stochastic multiagent systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 51(6): 3361–3370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Zhao X, Zhou S, Wang S, and Yan S. 2020. Formation containment control based on multiple unmanned aerial vehicle system[J]. Computer Engineering, 47(8): 284–289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. He X, Wang Q. 2014. Finite-Time Containment control for second-order multi-agent systems under directed topology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 61(8): 619–623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Lou Y, Hong Y. 2012. Target containment control of multi-agent systems with random switching interconnection topologies[J]. Automatica, 48(5): 879–885.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Tang Z, Yu Z, and Wei Z. 2022. Fixed-time containment control for nonlinear multi-agent systems under directed network topology[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 14(2): 241–246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Xiao W, Ren H, Zhou Q, Li H, and Lu R. 2022. Distributed finite-time containment control for nonlinear multiagent systems with mismatched disturbances[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52(7): 6939–6948.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Xu T, Lv G, Duan Z, Sun Z, and Yu J. 2020. Distributed fixed-time triggering-based containment control for networked nonlinear agents under directed graphs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 67(10): 3541–3552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Pang K, Ma L, Bai H, and Xue S. 2022. Finite-Time Containment control for nonlinear second-order multiagent system under directed topology[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 16(4): 6175–6184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Meng Z, Ren W, You Z. 2010. Distributed finite-time attitude containment control for multiple rigid bodies[J]. Automatica, 46(12): 2092–2099.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Wang Y, Song Y, and Ren W. 2018. Distributed adaptive finite-time approach for formation-containment control of networked nonlinear systems under directed topology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29(7):3164–3175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Ning B, Zuo Z, Jin J, and J Zheng. 2018. Distributed fixed-time coordinated tracking for nonlinear multi-agent systems under directed graphs[J]. Asian Journal of Control, 20(2): 646–658.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Xiao W, Li H, Lu R, Meng W, and Xu Y. 2020. Command-filter-based adaptive containment control for stochastic nonlinear multi-agent systems[C]//Proceedings of the 2020 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2932–2937.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang Z, Liu S, and Li X. 2021. Finite-time containment control of nonlinear delayed fractional multi-agent systems[J]. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 19(10): 3379–3387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Zhao L, Chen X, Yu J, and Shi P. 2022. Output feedback-based neural adaptive finite-time containment control of non-strict feedback nonlinear multi-agent systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 69(2): 847–858.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Ouyang Y, Xue L, Dong L, and Sun C. 2022. Neural network-based finite-time distributed formation-containment control of two-layer quadrotor UAVs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(8): 4836–4848.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Overview on Containment Control of Multi-agent Systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SPML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning
      July 2023
      383 pages
      ISBN:9798400707575
      DOI:10.1145/3614008

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format