skip to main content
10.1145/3613905.3651034acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

A Situated-Infrastructuring of WhatsApp for Business in India

Published:11 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

WhatsApp has become a pivotal communication tool in India, transcending cultural boundaries and deeply integrating into the nation’s digital landscape. Meta’s introduction of WhatsApp for Business aligns seamlessly with the platform’s popularity, offering businesses a crucial tool. However, the monetization plans pose challenges, particularly for smaller businesses, in balancing revenue goals with accessibility. This study, employing discourse analysis, examines Meta’s infrastructuring of WhatsApp in India, emphasizing the dynamic interplay of technological, social, and cultural dimensions. Consequently, it highlights potential power differences caused by the deployment of WhatsApp for Business followed by its gradual but significant modifications, encouraging scholars to investigate the implications and ethics of rapid technological changes, particularly for marginalized users.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3613905.3651034-talk-video.mp4

Talk Video

mp4

7.3 MB

References

  1. 2023. Meta Announces New Business-Focused Features for WhatsApp in India. https://www.business-standard.com/technology/apps/meta-announces-new-business-focused-features-for-whatsapp-in-india-details-123092000375_1.html Accessed: 2024/03/10 23:26:52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ravi Agrawal. 2018. India connected: How the smartphone is transforming the world’s largest democracy. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Shilpa Bagdare. 2021. Whatsapp marketing by women entrepreneurs in India. South Asian Journal Of Marketing & Management Research 11, 4 (2021), 34–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sumedha Bajar and Meenakshi Rajeev. 2015. The impact of infrastructure provisioning on inequality: Evidence from India. Technical Report. Global Labour University Working Paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Devanuj Balkrishan, Anirudha Joshi, Chandni Rajendran, Nazreen Nizam, Chinmay Parab, and Sujit Devkar. 2016. Making and breaking the user-usage model: Whatsapp adoption amongst emergent users in India. In Proceedings of the 8th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 52–63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Matthew J. Bietz, Eric P. Baumer, and Charlotte P. Lee. 2010. Synergizing in Cyberinfrastructure Development. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 19, 3–4 (aug 2010), 245–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9114-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anders Blok, Moe Nakazora, and Brit Ross Winthereik. 2016. Infrastructuring environments., 22 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Geoffrey C Bowker, Karen Baker, Florence Millerand, and David Ribes. 2010. Toward information infrastructure studies: Ways of knowing in a networked environment. International handbook of internet research (2010), 97–117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Geoffrey C Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Shatanik Chakrabarty. 2011. Micro and Small Sectors: Backbone of the Indian Economy. Available at SSRN 1957490 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dr Anupam Chanda. 2018. Whatsapp as a means of sharing information among LIS professionals of North-East India: A study. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences (IMPACT: IJRANSS) 6, 9 (2018), 69–82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rakesh Chaudhary. 2017. Demographic factors, personality and entrepreneurial inclination: A study among Indian university students. Education + Training 59, 2 (2017), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2016-0024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Isam Faik, Michael Barrett, and Eivor Oborn. 2020. How information technology matters in societal change: An affordance-based institutional logics perspective.MIS quarterly 44, 3 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hongzhong Fan, Hossain Md Ismail, Sultanuzzaman Md Reza, 2018. Technological innovation, infrastructure and industrial growth in Bangladesh: empirical evidence from ardl and granger causality approach. Asian Economic and Financial Review 8, 7 (2018), 964–985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Rosalind Gill. 2000. Discourse analysis. Qualitative researching with text, image and sound 1 (2000), 172–190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Stephen Graham and Simon Marvin. 2001. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. John Harriss. 2002. On trust, and trust in Indian business: Ethnographic explorations. London: Development Studies Institute (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Penny Harvey and Hannah Knox. 2016. The enchantments of infrastructure. In Roads and Anthropology. Routledge, 63–78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas Herdin, Wolfgang Hofkirchner, and Ursula Maier-Rabler. 2008. Culture and Technology: A Mutual-Shaping Approach. In Information Security and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global, 15. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-937-3.ch249 OnDemand: (Individual Chapters) Available $37.50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Hogan. 2018. Big Data Ecologies. Ephemera 18, 3 (2018), 631.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. International Centre for Frugal Innovation. 2022. The Global South as test-bed for innovations. https://www.icfi.nl/the-global-south-as-test-bed-for-innovations. Accessed: January 24, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Iqbal. 2020. WhatsApp Revenue and Usage Statistics (2020). https://www.businessofapps.com/data/whatsapp-statistics/. Business of Apps (November 3 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Karim Jabbar and Pernille Bjørn. 2017. Growing the Blockchain Information Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6487–6498. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025959Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Steven J. Jackson. 2014. Rethinking Repair. In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. G. Jasser, J. McSwiney, E. Pertwee, and S. Zannettou. 2023. ’Welcome to #GabFam’: Far-right virtual community on Gab. New Media & Society 25, 7 (2023), 1728–1745. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211024546Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Raj G. R. Javalgi and David A. Grossman. 2016. Aspirations and entrepreneurial motivations of middle-class consumers in emerging markets: The case of India. International Business Review 25, 3 (2016), 657–667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Victor Jupp (Ed.). 2006. The SAGE dictionary of social research methods. Vol. 1-0. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Helena Karasti and Jeanette Blomberg. 2018. Studying Infrastructuring Ethnographically. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 27 (2018), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9296-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Mary Lawhon, David Nilsson, Jonathan Silver, Henrik Ernstson, and Shuaib Lwasa. 2018. Thinking through heterogeneous infrastructure configurations. Urban Studies 55, 4 (2018), 720–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017720149 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017720149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. A Madanapalle. 2017. This is the story of how WhatsApp went from status updates to world domination in just 8 years. First Post (May 11 2017). https://www.firstpost.com/tech/news-analysis/this-is-the-story-of-how-whatsapp-went-from-status-updates-to-world-domination-in-just-8-years-3702575.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jessica Maddox and Shaheen Kanthawala. 2023. The Revolution Will Be Forwarded: Interrogating India’s WhatsApp Imaginary. Journal of Communication Inquiry 47, 3 (2023), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599221095177 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599221095177Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. J. W. Malazita and K. Resetar. 2019. Infrastructures of Abstraction: How Computer Science Education Produces Anti-political Subjects. Digital Creativity 30, 4 (2019), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2019.1682616Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Stina Matthiesen and Pernille Bjørn. 2015. Why Replacing Legacy Systems Is So Hard in Global Software Development: An Information Infrastructure Perspective. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 876–890. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675232Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Rooshabh Kumar Mehta and CD Bhavsar. 2017. An Exploratory Study to Understand the Usage of WhatsApp in India. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 7, 5 (2017), 135–145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Donna M. Mertens and Sharlene Hesse-Biber. 2012. Triangulation and Mixed Methods Research: Provocative Positions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6, 2 (2012), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437100 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437100Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Anouk Mols and Jason Pridmore. 2021. Always available via WhatsApp: Mapping everyday boundary work practices and privacy negotiations. Mobile Media & Communication 9, 3 (2021), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920970582 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920970582Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Rahul Mukherjee. 2019. Imagining Cellular India. Global Digital Cultures: Perspectives from South Asia (2019) 76 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Alondra Nelson. 2002. Introduction: FUTURE TEXTS. Social Text 20, 2 (71) (2002), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-20-2_71-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Alondra Nelson. 2011. Body and Soul: The Black Panther Party and the Fight against Medical Discrimination. University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Safiya Umoja Noble. 2016. A future for intersectional black feminist technology studies. Scholar & Feminist Online 13, 3 (2016), 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Fredrik Ohlin and Carl Magnus Olsson. 2015. Beyond a utility view of personal informatics: a postphenomenological framework. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp/ISWC’15 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2800965Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Irene V. Pasquetto, Eaman Jahani, Shubham Atreja, and Matthew Baum. 2022. Social Debunking of Misinformation on WhatsApp: The Case for Strong and In-Group Ties. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW1, Article 117 (apr 2022), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512964Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Marinela Potor. 2023. How to use messaging apps for marketing: Everything you need to know. https://engage.sinch.com/blog/messaging-apps-marketing-guide/ Accessed on 2024-01-23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Tim Rapley. 2007. Doing Conversation, Discourse and Document Analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208901Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Tony Richardson. 2016. Objecting (to) Infrastructure: Ecopolitics at the Ukrainian Ends of the Danube. Science as Culture 25, 1 (2016), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1081503Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Tony Ridley, Lee Yee-Cheong, and Calestous Juma. 2006. Infrastructure, innovation and development. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 2, 3-4 (2006), 268–278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Prasanto K. Roy. 2019. Mobile Data: Why India has the world’s cheapest. BBC News (18 3 2019). https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47537201Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Kanchan Srivastava. 2023. Meta Turbulence: How India went from key focus market to leadership layoffs. Exchange4media (2023). https://www.exchange4media.com/digital-news/why-did-meta-sack-staff-in-its-most-important-market-despite-huge-profit-127720.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. SUSAN LEIGH STAR. 1999. The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43, 3 (1999), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Susan Leigh Star. 2002. Infrastructure and ethnographic practice: Working on the fringes. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14, 2 (2002), 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Susan Leigh Star and Geoffrey C Bowker. 2007. Enacting silence: Residual categories as a challenge for ethics, information systems, and communication. Ethics and Information Technology 9, 4 (2007), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-007-9141-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Susan Leigh Star and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19, 3 (1989), 387–420. http://www.jstor.org/stable/285080Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder. 1994. Steps towards an Ecology of Infrastructure: Complex Problems in Design and Access for Large-Scale Collaborative Systems. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA) (CSCW ’94). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/192844.193021Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Emma Strubell, Avinash Ganesh, and Andrew McCallum. 2020. Energy and Policy Considerations for Modern Deep Learning Research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 13693–13696. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Business Today. 2023. WhatsApp’s India Dilemma: Massive Userbase but Struggling Revenue - What Can Meta Do?https://www.businesstoday.in/magazine/deep-dive/story/whatsapps-india-dilemma-massive-userbase-but-struggling-revenue-what-can-meta-do-402783-2023-10-20Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Jonathan Vanian. 2023. Meta’s WhatsApp is chasing big businesses in effort to finally capitalize on app’s popularity. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/01/metas-whatsapp-is-chasing-big-businesses-to-capitalize-on-popularity.html CNBC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Rama Adithya Varanasi, Joyojeet Pal, and Aditya Vashistha. 2022. Accost, Accede, or Amplify: Attitudes towards COVID-19 Misinformation on WhatsApp in India. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, New Orleans, LA, USA, ) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 256, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517588Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Asta Vonderau. 2019. Storing Data, Infrastructuring the Air: Thermocultures of the Cloud. Culture Machine 18, 5 (2019), 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Rui Zhou and Betsy DiSalvo. 2020. User’s Role in Platform Infrastructuralization: WeChat as an Exemplar. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Ann Zimmerman and Thomas A. Finholt. 2007. Growing an Infrastructure: The Role of Gateway Organizations in Cultivating New Communities of Users. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316660Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Situated-Infrastructuring of WhatsApp for Business in India

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '24: Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2024
      4761 pages
      ISBN:9798400703317
      DOI:10.1145/3613905

      Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 May 2024

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI PLAY '24
      The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 14 - 17, 2024
      Tampere , Finland
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)63

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format