skip to main content
10.1145/3613904.3642304acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Artifacts Available / v1.1

WooDowel: Electrode Isolation for Electromagnetic Shielding in Triboelectric Plywood Sensors

Published:11 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a new approach to address the challenges associated with maintaining the functionality of triboelectric vibration sensors in smart plywood during woodworking operations involving nails and screws. The current state-of-the-art sensor design employs non-overlapping electrodes, which unfortunately leads to significant compromises in terms of signal strength and clarity, particularly in real-world scenarios that involve electromagnetic (EM) interference. To overcome these limitations, we propose a method that enables the woodworker to manually isolate short-circuited electrodes. This method facilitates the creation of sensors using overlapping electrodes, while also incorporating EM shielding, thereby resulting in a substantial improvement in the sensor’s robustness when detecting user activities. To validate the effectiveness of our proposed approach, we conducted a series of experiments, which not only shed light on the drawbacks of non-overlapping electrode designs but also demonstrated the significant improvements achieved through our method.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

Video Presentation

Video Presentation

mp4

196 MB

Video Figure

Introduction Video of WooDowel

mp4

291.5 MB

References

  1. Nivedita Arora, Steven L. Zhang, Fereshteh Shahmiri, Diego Osorio, Yi-Cheng Wang, Mohit Gupta, Zhengjun Wang, Thad Starner, Zhong Lin Wang, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2018. SATURN: A Thin and Flexible Self-Powered Microphone Leveraging Triboelectric Nanogenerator. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 2, Article 60 (jul 2018), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3214263Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Artem Dementyev, Hsin-Liu Kao, and Joseph A Paradiso. 2015. Sensortape: Modular and programmable 3d-aware dense sensor network on a tape. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. 649–658.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Xing Fan, Jun Chen, Jin Yang, Peng Bai, Zhaoling Li, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2015. Ultrathin, rollable, paper-based triboelectric nanogenerator for acoustic energy harvesting and self-powered sound recording. ACS nano 9, 4 (2015), 4236–4243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Xing Fan, Jun Chen, Jin Yang, Peng Bai, Zhaoling Li, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2015. Ultrathin, Rollable, Paper-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Acoustic Energy Harvesting and Self-Powered Sound Recording. ACS Nano 9, 4 (April 2015), 4236–4243. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b00618 Publisher: American Chemical Society.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jun Gong, Yu Wu, Lei Yan, Teddy Seyed, and Xing-Dong Yang. 2019. Tessutivo: Contextual interactions on interactive fabrics with inductive sensing. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 29–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Saifei Hao, Jingyi Jiao, Yandong Chen, Zhong Lin Wang, and Xia Cao. 2020. Natural wood-based triboelectric nanogenerator as self-powered sensing for smart homes and floors. Nano Energy 75 (2020), 104957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ahmed Haroun, Mohamed Tarek, Mohamed Mosleh, and Farouk Ismail. 2022. Recent progress on triboelectric nanogenerators for vibration energy harvesting and vibration sensing. Nanomaterials 12, 17 (2022), 2960.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chris Harrison and Scott E Hudson. 2008. Scratch input: creating large, inexpensive, unpowered and mobile finger input surfaces. In Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 205–208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. David Holman and Roel Vertegaal. 2011. TactileTape: low-cost touch sensing on curved surfaces. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium adjunct on User interface software and technology. 17–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Te-Chien Hou, Ya Yang, Hulin Zhang, Jun Chen, Lih-Juann Chen, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2013. Triboelectric nanogenerator built inside shoe insole for harvesting walking energy. Nano Energy 2, 5 (2013), 856–862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kiyoshi Itao. 2007. Wearable Sensor Network Connecting Artifacts, Nature and Human Being. In SENSORS, 2007 IEEE. 1120–1123. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2007.4388603Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Weon-Guk Kim, Do-Wan Kim, Il-Woong Tcho, Jin-Ki Kim, Moon-Seok Kim, and Yang-Kyu Choi. 2021. Triboelectric nanogenerator: Structure, mechanism, and applications. Acs Nano 15, 1 (2021), 258–287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Saman Kuntharin, Viyada Harnchana, Jirapan Sintusiri, Prasit Thongbai, Annop Klamchuen, Kitiphat Sinthiptharakoon, Vittaya Amornkitbamrung, and Prinya Chindaprasirt. 2023. Smart triboelectric floor based on calcium silicate-carbon composite for energy harvesting and motion sensing applications. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 358 (2023), 114423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Zhihui Lai, Junchen Xu, Chris R Bowen, and Shengxi Zhou. 2022. Self-powered and self-sensing devices based on human motion. Joule 6, 7 (2022), 1501–1565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Long Lin, Sihong Wang, Yannan Xie, Qingshen Jing, Simiao Niu, Youfan Hu, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2013. Segmentally structured disk triboelectric nanogenerator for harvesting rotational mechanical energy. Nano letters 13, 6 (2013), 2916–2923.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jinming Ma, Yang Jie, Jie Bian, Tao Li, Xia Cao, and Ning Wang. 2017. From triboelectric nanogenerator to self-powered smart floor: a minimalist design. Nano Energy 39 (2017), 192–199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. E Wood Meier. 2015. Identifying and using hundreds of woods worldwide. Wood Database (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Simiao Niu, Sihong Wang, Long Lin, Ying Liu, Yu Sheng Zhou, Youfan Hu, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2013. Theoretical study of contact-mode triboelectric nanogenerators as an effective power source. Energy & Environmental Science 6, 12 (2013), 3576–3583.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Simiao Niu and Zhong Lin Wang. 2015. Theoretical systems of triboelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 14 (2015), 161–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.034 Special issue on the 2nd International Conference on Nanogenerators and Piezotronics (NGPT 2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Simon Olberding, Nan-Wei Gong, John Tiab, Joseph A Paradiso, and Jürgen Steimle. 2013. A cuttable multi-touch sensor. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 245–254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Shijia Pan, Ceferino Gabriel Ramirez, Mostafa Mirshekari, Jonathon Fagert, Albert Jin Chung, Chih Chi Hu, John Paul Shen, Hae Young Noh, and Pei Zhang. 2017. Surfacevibe: vibration-based tap & swipe tracking on ubiquitous surfaces. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. 197–208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Patrick Parzer, Florian Perteneder, Kathrin Probst, Christian Rendl, Joanne Leong, Sarah Schuetz, Anita Vogl, Reinhard Schwoediauer, Martin Kaltenbrunner, Siegfried Bauer, 2018. Resi: A highly flexible, pressure-sensitive, imperceptible textile interface based on resistive yarns. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 745–756.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Yu Shao, Xinyue Wang, Wenjie Song, Sobia Ilyas, Haibo Guo, and Wen-Shao Chang. 2021. Feasibility of using floor vibration to detect human falls. International journal of environmental research and public health 18, 1 (2021), 200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jianguo Sun, Kunkun Tu, Simon Büchele, Sophie Marie Koch, Yong Ding, Shivaprakash N. Ramakrishna, Sandro Stucki, Hengyu Guo, Changsheng Wu, Tobias Keplinger, Javier Pérez-Ramírez, Ingo Burgert, and Guido Panzarasa. 2021. Functionalized wood with tunable tribopolarity for efficient triboelectric nanogenerators. Matter 4, 9 (2021), 3049–3066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.07.022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Saiganesh Swaminathan, Jonathon Fagert, Michael Rivera, Andrew Cao, Gierad Laput, Hae Young Noh, and Scott E Hudson. 2020. Optistructures: Fabrication of room-scale interactive structures with embedded fiber bragg grating optical sensors and displays. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 2 (2020), 1–21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ryo Takahashi, Takuya Sasatani, Fuminori Okuya, Yoshiaki Narusue, and Yoshihiro Kawahara. 2018. Design of Cuttable Wireless Power Transfer Sheet. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers. 456–459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wei Teng, Xian Ding, Shiyao Tang, Jin Xu, Bingshuai Shi, and Yibing Liu. 2021. Vibration analysis for fault detection of wind turbine drivetrains—A comprehensive investigation. Sensors 21, 5 (2021), 1686.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Zhong Lin Wang. 2013. Triboelectric nanogenerators as new energy technology for self-powered systems and as active mechanical and chemical sensors. ACS nano 7, 11 (2013), 9533–9557.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Raphael Wimmer and Patrick Baudisch. 2011. Modular and deformable touch-sensitive surfaces based on time domain reflectometry. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 517–526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Te-Yen Wu and Xing-Dong Yang. 2022. iWood: Makeable Vibration Sensor for Interactive Plywood. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Robert Xiao, Greg Lew, James Marsanico, Divya Hariharan, Scott Hudson, and Chris Harrison. 2014. Toffee: enabling ad hoc, around-device interaction with acoustic time-of-arrival correlation. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services. 67–76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Minyi Xu, Peihong Wang, Yi-Cheng Wang, Steven L Zhang, Aurelia Chi Wang, Chunli Zhang, Zhengjun Wang, Xinxiang Pan, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2018. A soft and robust spring based triboelectric nanogenerator for harvesting arbitrary directional vibration energy and self-powered vibration sensing. Advanced Energy Materials 8, 9 (2018), 1702432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jin Yang, Jun Chen, Ying Liu, Weiqing Yang, Yuanjie Su, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2014. Triboelectrification-based organic film nanogenerator for acoustic energy harvesting and self-powered active acoustic sensing. ACS nano 8, 3 (2014), 2649–2657.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Yuanming Zeng, Huijing Xiang, Ning Zheng, Xia Cao, Ning Wang, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2022. Flexible triboelectric nanogenerator for human motion tracking and gesture recognition. Nano Energy 91 (2022), 106601.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Hulin Zhang, Ya Yang, Yuanjie Su, Jun Chen, Katherine Adams, Sangmin Lee, Chenguo Hu, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2014. Triboelectric nanogenerator for harvesting vibration energy in full space and as self-powered acceleration sensor. Advanced Functional Materials 24, 10 (2014), 1401–1407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. WooDowel: Electrode Isolation for Electromagnetic Shielding in Triboelectric Plywood Sensors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '24: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2024
      18961 pages
      ISBN:9798400703300
      DOI:10.1145/3613904

      Copyright © 2024 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI PLAY '24
      The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 14 - 17, 2024
      Tampere , Finland
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)238
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)238

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format