skip to main content
10.1145/3613347.3613357acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicomsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Stochastic Dominance, Risk, and Weak Sub-majorization with Applications to Portfolio Optimization

Published:13 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we draw connections between second-order stochastic dominance (SSD), CVaR risk, and weak sub-majorization for empirical observations of random variables, where many other known equivalences and extensions can be made. As an application, we formulate and solve portfolio optimization problems based on SSD constraints. Based on an alternative characterization of the SSD rules for empirical distributions through weak sub-majorization conditions, we propose an alternative formulation of the SSD-constrained portfolio optimization problems with linear constraints using doubly substochastic matrices. The same technique is also applied to controlling drawdowns of a portfolio, where we formulate and solve drawdown SSD-constrained portfolio optimization problems with linear constraints. These convex programs result in an optimal portfolio that demonstrates more controlled drawdown behaviors than the benchmark portfolio chosen as the reference in SSD constraints.

References

  1. [1] Antoniadis, A., Barcelo, N., Nugent, M., Pruhs, K., Schewior, K., and Scquizzato, M. (2016). Chasing Convex Bodies and Functions. In: Kranakis, E., Navarro, G., Chávez, E. (eds) LATIN 2016: Theoretical Informatics, LATIN 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9644, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Argue, C. J., Gupta, A., and Guruganesh, G. (2020). Dimension-Free Bounds for Chasing Convex Functions. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 125: 1-23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Argue, C. J., Gupta, A., Guruganesh, G., and Tang, Z. (2021). Chasing Convex Bodies with Linear Competitive Ratio. J. ACM, 68, 5, Article 32 (October 2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] Bäuerle, N., and Müller A. (2006). Stochastic Orders and Risk Measures: Consistency and Bounds. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38(1): 132-148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Bubeck, S., Lee, Y. T., Li, Y., and Sellke, M. (2019). Competitively Chasing Convex Bodies. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2019), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 861–868.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Chen, N., Goel, G., and Wierman, A. (2018). Smoothed Online Convex Optimization in High Dimensions via Online Balanced Descent. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review., 46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Christianson, N. H., Handina, T., and Wierman, A. (2022). Chasing Convex Bodies and Functions with Black-Box Advice. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 178: 1–42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Dentcheva, D., and Ruszczyński, A. (2004). Convexification of Stochastic Ordering. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie Bulgare des Sciences., 57(4): 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] Dentcheva, D., and Ruszczyński, A. (2006). Portfolio Optimization with Stochastic Dominance Constraints. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(2): 433-451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Ding, R., and Uryasev, S. (2022). Drawdown Beta and Portfolio Optimization. Quantitative Finance, 22(7): 1265-1276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Ding, R. (2023). f-Betas and Portfolio Optimization with f-Divergence induced Risk Measures. arXiv:2302.00452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Dommel, P., and Pichler, A. (2020). Convex Risk Measures based on Divergence. arXiv:2003.07648.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Domingo-Enricha, C., Schiff, Y., and Mroueh, Y. (2022). Learning with Stochastic Orders. arXiv:2205.13684.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Fishburn, P. (1976). Continua of Stochastic Dominance Relations for Bounded Probability Distributions. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 3(3): 295-311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Fishburn, P. (1980). Continua of Stochastic Dominance Relations for Unbounded Probability Distributions. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 7(3): 271-285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Huang, R. J., Tzeng, L. Y., and Zhao, L. (2020). Fractional Degree Stochastic Dominance. Management Science, 66(10): 4630-4647.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Kamihigashi, T., and Stachurski, J. (2014). An Axiomatic Approach to Measuring Degree of Stochastic Dominance. Discussion Paper Series DP2014-36, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Krokhmal, P., Uryasev, S., and Zrazhevsky, G. (2005). Numerical Comparison of Conditional Value-at-Risk and Conditional Drawdown-at-Risk Approaches: Application to Hedge Funds. In Applications of Stochastic Programming, pp. 609-631, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Levy, H. (2006). Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making Under Uncertainty, Springer, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] Marshall, A. W., and Olkin, I. (1979). Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Applications. Academic Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. [21] Marcus, M., and Ree, R. (1959). Diagonals of Doubly Stochastic Matrices. Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, 10(1959): 296-302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Ok, E. (2007). Real Analysis with Economics Applications. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Przeslawski, K., and Yost, D. (1989). Continuity Properties of Selectors. Michigan Math J., 36(1): 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Sellke, M. (2020). Chasing Convex Bodies Optimally. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA ’20), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, USA, 1509–1518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. [25] Stoyanov, S., Rachev, S. T., and Fabozzi, F. J. (2012). Metrization of Stochastic Dominance Rules. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), 15, 1250017-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Schmid, F., and Trede, M. (1996). Nonparametric Inference for Second Order Stochastic Dominance. Discussion Papers in Econometrics and Statistics 2/96, University of Cologne, Institute of Econometrics and Statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Xue, M., Shi, Y., and Sun, H. (2020). Portfolio Optimization with Relaxation of Stochastic Second Order Dominance Constraints via Conditional Value at Risk. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 13, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Stochastic Dominance, Risk, and Weak Sub-majorization with Applications to Portfolio Optimization
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICoMS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Mathematics and Statistics
            July 2023
            160 pages
            ISBN:9798400700187
            DOI:10.1145/3613347

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 December 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format