skip to main content
10.1145/3610978.3640646acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

Implementation and Evaluation of a Motivational Robotic Coach for Repetitive Stroke Rehabilitation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 March 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Repetitive, individual exercises can improve the functional ability of stroke survivors over the long term. With the aim of providing extra motivation to adhere to repetitive, individual rehabilitation, this paper presents a robotic coach for stroke rehabilitation. Our system uses the Pepper robot and performs one of twelve data-driven coaching policies. The policies were learned from human-human observations of professional stroke physiotherapists and provide high-level personalisation based on user information and training context. A within subjects evaluation of the system was conducted in-person involving short interactions with 3 stroke survivors. The system was able to engage the target end users and there were indications that decreased workload could be possible when using the system compared to exercising alone.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. M. T. Jurkiewicz, S. Marzolini, and P. Oh, "Adherence to a Home-Based Exercise Program for Individuals After Stroke," Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 277--284, 2011, doi: 10.1310/tsr1803--277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. L. Sussenbach et al., "A robot as fitness companion: Towards an interactive action-based motivation model," IEEE RO-MAN 2014 - 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication: Human-Robot Co-Existence: Adaptive Interfaces and Systems for Daily Life, Therapy, Assistance and Socially Engaging Interactions, pp. 286--293, 2014, doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. K. Winkle, S. Lemaignan, P. Caleb-Solly, U. Leonards, A. Turton, and P. Bremner, "Couch to 5km Robot Coach: An Autonomous, Human-Trained Socially Assistive Robot," in Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, in HRI '20. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Association for Computing Machinery, Mar. 2020, pp. 520--522. doi: 10.1145/3371382.3378337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Wade, A. R. Parnandi, and M. J. Mataric, "Using Socially Assistive Robotics to Augment Motor Task Performance in Individuals Post -- Stroke," in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2011, pp. 2403--2408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. K. Ross, F. Broz, and L. Baillie, "Observing and Clustering Coaching Behaviours to Inform the Design of a Personalised Robotic Coach," in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Virtual (originally Toulouse, France): ACM, Sep. 2021. doi: 10.1145/3447526.3472043.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Winkle, P. Caleb-Solly, A. Turton, and P. Bremner, "Social Robots for Engagement in Rehabilitative Therapies: Design Implications from a Study with Therapists," in Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI '18, 2018, pp. 289--297. doi: 10.1145/3171221.3171273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. K. Ross, F. Broz, and L. Baillie, "Individual Squash Training is More Effective and Social with a Humanoid Robotic Coach," in 2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Aug. 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Feingold Polak and S. L. Tzedek, "Social Robot for Rehabilitation: Expert Clinicians and Post-Stroke Patients' Evaluation Following a Long-Term Intervention," in Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, in HRI '20. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Association for Computing Machinery, Mar. 2020, pp. 151--160. doi: 10.1145/3319502.3374797.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Nikolaidis, R. Ramakrishnan, K. Gu, and J. Shah, "Efficient Model Learning from Joint-Action Demonstrations for Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks," in Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI '15, ACM, Mar. 2015, pp. 189--196. Accessed: Mar. 02, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2696454.2696455Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Céspedes et al., "A Socially Assistive Robot for Long-Term Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Real World," Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 15, 2021, Accessed: Jul. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbot.2021.633248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Fasola and M. J. Mataric, "Using Socially Assistive Human-Robot Interaction to Motivate Physical Exercise for Older Adults," in Household Service Robotics, vol. 100, no. 8, 2014, pp. 487--516. doi: 10.1016/B978-0--12--800881--2.00022-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Iovino, E. Scukins, J. Styrud, P. Ögren, and C. Smith, "A Survey of Behavior Trees in Robotics and AI," arXiv:2005.05842 [cs], May 2020, Accessed: Apr. 01, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.05842Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Coté, J. K. Yardley, J. Hay, W. A. Sedgwick, and J. Baker, "An Exploratory Examination of the Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport," AVANTE, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 82--92, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. M. Ryan, "Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. - PsycNET," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 450--361, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland, "Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research," in Advances in Psychology, vol. 52, P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds., in Human Mental Workload, vol. 52., North-Holland, 1988, pp. 139--183. doi: 10.1016/S0166--4115(08)62386--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A. Silva and M. Gombolay, "ARXIV version: Encoding Human Experts' Domain Knowledge to Warm Start Reinforcement Learning," in AAAI, 2021. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Implementation and Evaluation of a Motivational Robotic Coach for Repetitive Stroke Rehabilitation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HRI '24: Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
        March 2024
        1408 pages
        ISBN:9798400703232
        DOI:10.1145/3610978

        Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 March 2024

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)41

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader