skip to main content
research-article

Exploring the Opportunities of AR for Enriching Storytelling with Family Photos between Grandparents and Grandchildren

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 September 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Storytelling with family photos, as an important mode of reminiscence-based activities, can be instrumental in promoting intergenerational communication between grandparents and grandchildren by strengthening generation bonds and shared family values. Motivated by challenges that existing technology approaches encountered for improving intergenerational storytelling (e.g., the need to hold the tablet, the potential view detachment from the physical world in Virtual Reality (VR)), we sought to find new ways of using Augmented Reality (AR) to support intergenerational storytelling, which offers new capabilities (e.g., 3D models, new interactivity) to enhance the expression for the storyteller. We conducted a two-part exploratory study, where pairs of grandparents and grandchildren 1) participated in an in-person storytelling activity with a semi-structured interview 2) and then a participatory design session with AR technology probes that we designed to inspire their exploration. Our findings revealed insights into the possible ways of intergenerational storytelling, the feasibility and usages of AR in facilitating it, and the key design implications for leveraging AR in intergenerational storytelling.

References

  1. Tanja Aitamurto, Jean-Baptiste Boin, Kaiping Chen, Ahmed Cherif, and Skanda Shridhar. 2018. The impact of augmented reality on art engagement: liking, impression of learning, and distraction. In Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Applications in Health, Cultural Heritage, and Industry: 10th International Conference, VAMR 2018, Held as Part of HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part II 10. Springer, 153--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Benett Axtell and Cosmin Munteanu. 2019. Back to Real Pictures: A Cross-Generational Understanding of Users' Mental Models of Photo Cloud Storage. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 3, Article 74 (sep 2019), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351232Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Benett Axtell, Raheleh Saryazdi, and Cosmin Munteanu. 2022. Design is Worth a Thousand Words: The Effect of Digital Interaction Design on Picture-Prompted Reminiscence. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 63, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Janet B Bavelas, Linda Coates, and Trudy Johnson. 2000. Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of personality and social psychology 79, 6 (2000), 941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Pierre Benckendorff, Iis P Tussyadiah, and Caroline Scarles. 2018. The role of digital technologies in facilitating intergenerational learning in heritage tourism. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2018. Springer, 463--472.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Annette Bohn. 2010. Generational differences in cultural life scripts and life story memories of younger and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology 24, 9 (2010), 1324--1345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Norbert Braun. 2003. Storytelling in collaborative augmented reality environments. (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 1877--1901.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Stefano Brusaporci, Gianfranco Ruggieri, Filippo Sicuranza, and Pamela Maiezza. 2017. Augmented reality for historical storytelling. The INCIPICT project for the reconstruction of tangible and intangible image of L'Aquila historical centre. In Proceedings, Vol. 60. MDPI, 1083.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Licia Calvi. 2020. What do we know about AR Storytelling?. In Proceedings of the 6th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good. 278--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jun-Cheng Chen, Wei-Ta Chu, Jin-Hau Kuo, Chung-Yi Weng, and Ja-Ling Wu. 2006. Tiling slideshow. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimedia. 25--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jenny CC Chung. 2009. An intergenerational reminiscence programme for older adults with early dementia and youth volunteers: values and challenges. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences 23, 2 (2009), 259--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Malcolm E. Cook, Wendy G. Lehnert, and David D. McDonald. 1984. Conveying Implicit Content in Narrative Summaries. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 22nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (Stanford, California) (ACL '84/COLING '84). Association for Computational Linguistics, USA, 5--7. https://doi.org/10.3115/980491.980493Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Larry Cutler, Amy Tucker, Robert Schiewe, Justin Fischer, Nathaniel Dirksen, and Eric Darnell. 2020. Authoring Interactive VR Narratives on Baba Yaga and Bonfire. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2020 Talks (Virtual Event, USA) (SIGGRAPH '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 66, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3388767.3407319Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. 2015. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 38, 2 (2015), 295--307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Iddo Drori, Daniel Cohen-Or, and Hezy Yeshurun. 2003. Fragment-based image completion. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers. 303--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Robyn Fivush, Jennifer G Bohanek, and Marshall Duke. 2008. The intergenerational self: Subjective perspective and family history. Self continuity: Individual and collective perspectives (2008), 131--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim Flottemesch. 2013. LEARNING THROUGH NARRATIVES: THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL STORYTELLING ON INTERGENERATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 17, 3 (2013), 53--60. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/learning-through-narratives-impact-digital/docview/1369312253/se-2 Copyright - Copyright Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc 2013; Document feature - Last updated - 2021-09-09; SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - United States--US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim Flottemesch. 2013. Learning through narratives: The impact of digital storytelling on intergenerational relationships. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 17, 3 (2013), 53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Christina Gigliotti, Matt Morris, Sara Smock, Shannon E Jarrott, and Bonnie Graham. 2005. An intergenerational summer program involving persons with dementia and preschool children. Educational Gerontology 31, 6 (2005), 425--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Connie Golsteijn and Elise van den Hoven. 2013. Facilitating parent-teenager communication through interactive photo cubes. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 2 (2013), 273--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Victor M Gonzalez, Nazean Jomhari, and Sri Hastuti Kurniawan. 2012. Photo-based narratives as communication mediators between grandparents and their children and grandchildren living abroad. Universal Access in the Information Society 11, 1 (2012), 67--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. David John Hallford and David Mellor. 2016. Brief reminiscence activities improve state well-being and self-concept in young adults: A randomised controlled experiment. Memory 24, 10 (2016), 1311--1320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Shangchen Han, Beibei Liu, Randi Cabezas, Christopher D Twigg, Peizhao Zhang, Jeff Petkau, Tsz-Ho Yu, Chun-Jung Tai, Muzaffer Akbay, Zheng Wang, et al. 2020. MEgATrack: monochrome egocentric articulated hand-tracking for virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 39, 4 (2020), 87--1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Christina N. Harrington, Katya Borgos-Rodriguez, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Engaging Low-Income African American Older Adults in Health Discussions through Community-Based Design Workshops. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300823Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jennifer Healey, Duotun Wang, Curtis Wigington, Tong Sun, and Huaishu Peng. 2021. A Mixed-Reality System to Promote Child Engagement in Remote Intergenerational Storytelling. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 274--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Birgitte Sølbeck Henningsen, Rikke Ørngreen, and Nikoline Lohmann. 2019. Digital Storytelling in a youth and SoMe perspective-- experiences from the project "Stories from the North". In Proceedings of the International Digital Storytelling Conference DST 2018 [21-23/09/2018]: Current Trends in Digital Storytelling: Research & Practices. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 196--201.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Yasamin Heshmat, Carman Neustaedter, Kyle McCaffrey, William Odom, Ron Wakkary, and Zikun Yang. 2020. FamilyStories: Asynchronous Audio Storytelling for Family Members Across Time Zones. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376486Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jennifer Hewson, Claire Danbrook, and Jackie Sieppert. 2015. Engaging Post-Secondary Students and Older Adults in an Intergenerational Digital Storytelling Course. Contemporary Issues in Education Research 8, 3 (2015), 135--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ho Jin Jang, Jun Yeob Lee, Jeonghun Kwak, Dukho Lee, Jae-Hyeung Park, Byoungho Lee, and Yong Young Noh. 2019. Progress of display performances: AR, VR, QLED, OLED, and TFT. Journal of Information Display 20, 1 (2019), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Bumsoo Kang, Seungwoo Kang, and Inseok Hwang. 2021. MomentMeld: AI-Augmented Mobile Photographic Memento towards Mutually Stimulatory Inter-Generational Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 479, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445688Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. David Kaufman, Diogo Silva, Robyn Schell, and Simone Hausknecht. 2018. Design and Evaluation of an Online Digital Storytelling Course for Seniors. In Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference. Springer, 1133--1141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Bahjat Kawar, Shiran Zada, Oran Lang, Omer Tov, Huiwen Chang, Tali Dekel, Inbar Mosseri, and Michal Irani. 2022. Imagic: Text-Based Real Image Editing with Diffusion Models. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2210.09276Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Jody Koenig Kellas. 2005. Family Ties: Communicating Identity Through Jointly Told Family Stories This paper is based on the author's dissertation study and was presented on the Top Four Panel of the Family Communication Division at the National Communication Association Convention, November 2003, Miami, FL. Communication Monographs 72, 4 (2005), 365--389. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500322453 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500322453Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Jody Koenig Kellas. 2010. Narrating Family: Introduction to the Special Issue on Narratives and Storytelling in the Family. Journal of Family Communication 10, 1 (2010), 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267430903401441arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15267430903401441Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Susan Kemper, Shannon Rash, Donna Kynette, and Suzanne Norman. 1990. Telling stories: The structure of adults' narratives. European journal of cognitive psychology 2, 3 (1990), 205--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Natalia Kucirkova, Kieron Sheehy, and David Messer. 2015. A Vygotskian perspective on parent--child talk during iPad story sharing. Journal of Research in Reading 38, 4 (2015), 428--441. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12030 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9817.12030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Hung-Chi Lee, Ya Fang Cheng, Szu Yang Cho, Hsien-Hui Tang, Jane Hsu, and Chien-Hsiung Chen. 2014. Picgo: Designing Reminiscence and Storytelling for the Elderly with Photo Annotation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS Companion '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598784.2602769Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Li Na Lee, Mi Jeong Kim, and Won Ju Hwang. 2019. Potential of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Technologies to Promote Wellbeing in Older Adults. Applied Sciences 9, 17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Seyeon Lee, Hyunyoung Oh, Chung-Kon Shi, and Young Yim Doh. 2020. Life Review Using a Life Metaphoric Game to Promote Intergenerational Communication. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 98 (oct 2020), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415169Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Cun Li, Jun Hu, Bart Hengeveld, and Caroline Hummels. 2019. Slots-Memento: Facilitating Intergenerational Memento Storytelling and Preservation for the Elderly. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Tempe, Arizona, USA) (TEI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 359--366. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109. 3300979Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Cun Li, Jun Hu, Bart Hengeveld, and Caroline Hummels. 2019. Story-Me: Design of a System to Support Intergenerational Storytelling and Preservation for Older Adults. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS '19 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 245--250. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3301019.3323902Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Cun Li, Jun Hu, Bart Hengeveld, and Caroline Hummels. 2020. Supporting Intergenerational Memento Storytelling for Older Adults through a Tangible Display: A Case Study. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 26, 3 (jan 2020), 625--649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020- 01364-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Changyang Li, Wanwan Li, Haikun Huang, and Lap-Fai Yu. 2022. Interactive augmented reality storytelling guided by scene semantics. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 41, 4 (2022), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Amna Liaqat, Benett Axtell, and Cosmin Munteanu. 2021. Participatory Design for Intergenerational Culture Exchange in Immigrant Families: How Collaborative Narration and Creation Fosters Democratic Engagement. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Amna Liaqat, Benett Axtell, and Cosmin Munteanu. 2022. "With a Hint She Will Remember": Collaborative Storytelling and Culture Sharing between Immigrant Grandparents and Grandchildren Via Magic Thing Designs. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2, Article 268 (nov 2022), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Johannes Liem, Charles Perin, and Jo Wood. 2020. Structure and empathy in visual data storytelling: Evaluating their influence on attitude. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 39. Wiley Online Library, 277--289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Chen-Hsuan Lin, Jun Gao, Luming Tang, Towaki Takikawa, Xiaohui Zeng, Xun Huang, Karsten Kreis, Sanja Fidler, Ming-Yu Liu, and Tsung-Yi Lin. 2022. Magic3D: High-Resolution Text-to-3D Content Creation. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2211.10440Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Tzu-Chien Liu, Yi-Chun Lin, Meng-Jung Tsai, and Fred Paas. 2012. Split-attention and redundancy effects on mobile learning in physical environments. Computers & Education 58, 1 (2012), 172--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Barbara Mager. 2019. Storytelling contributes to resilience in older adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging 43, 1 (2019), 23--36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2018.1448669 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2018.1448669Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Helen Manchester and Keri Facer. 2015. Digital curation: Learning and legacy in later life. E-learning and Digital Media 12, 2 (2015), 242--258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Lara J. Martin, Brent Harrison, and Mark O. Riedl. 2016. Improvisational Computational Storytelling in Open Worlds. In Interactive Storytelling, Frank Nack and Andrew S. Gordon (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 73--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Natalie Merrill and Robyn Fivush. 2016. Intergenerational narratives and identity across development. Developmental Review 40 (2016), 72--92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.03.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Raul Mur-Artal and Juan D Tardós. 2017. Orb-slam2: An open-source slam system for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras. IEEE transactions on robotics 33, 5 (2017), 1255--1262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Alex Nichol, Prafulla Dhariwal, Aditya Ramesh, Pranav Shyam, Pamela Mishkin, Bob McGrew, Ilya Sutskever, and Mark Chen. 2021. GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Models. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV. 2112.10741Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Nicholas R Nicholson Jr. 2009. Social isolation in older adults: an evolutionary concept analysis. Journal of advanced nursing 65, 6 (2009), 1342--1352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Zizi Papacharissi. 2016. Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, communication & society 19, 3 (2016), 307--324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Pragea G Putra, Karen V Fernandez, and Michael SW Lee. 2022. Utilizing Digital Reality in Intergenerational Research. In The Routledge Handbook of Digital Consumption. Routledge, 178--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Yann Riche and Wendy Mackay. 2010. PeerCare: supporting awareness of rhythms and routines for better aging in place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 19, 1 (2010), 73--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. 2021. High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2112.10752Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Donald Ropes. 2013. Intergenerational learning in organizations. European Journal of Training and Development (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Delas Santano and Harold Thwaites. 2018. Augmented reality storytelling: A transmedia exploration. In 2018 3rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE) held jointly with 2018 24th International Conference on Virtual Systems & Multimedia (VSMM 2018). IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Seema Sehrawat, Celeste A Jones, Jennifer Orlando, Tucker Bowers, and Alexi Rubins. 2017. Digital storytelling: A tool for social connectedness. Gerontechnology (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Alexander Seifert and Anna Schlomann. 2021. The use of virtual and augmented reality by older adults: Potentials and challenges. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021), 639718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Jae-eun Shin, Boram Yoon, Dooyoung Kim, and Woontack Woo. 2022. The Effects of Spatial Complexity on Narrative Experience in Space-Adaptive AR Storytelling. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2022), 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG. 2022.3201934Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Ji Youn Shin, Minjin Rheu, Jina Huh-Yoo, and Wei Peng. 2021. Designing Technologies to Support Parent-Child Relationships: A Review of Current Findings and Suggestions for Future Directions. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 441 (oct 2021), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479585Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Sinem Siyahhan and Elisabeth Gee. 2018. Families at play: Connecting and learning through video games. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Sara W Smith, George W Rebok, William Ray Smith, Susan E Hall, and Mary Alvin. 1983. Adult age differences in the use of story structure in delayed free recall. Experimental Aging Research 9, 3 (1983), 191--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Jennifer Stargatt, Sunil Bhar, Jahar Bhowmik, and Abdullah Al Mahmud. 2022. Digital storytelling for health-related outcomes in older adults: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 24, 1 (2022), e28113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Ja-Hwung Su, Ming-Hua Hsieh, Tao Mei, and Vincent S Tseng. 2011. Photosense: Make sense of your photos with enriched harmonic music via emotion association. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Elizabeth Thiry and Mary Beth Rosson. 2012. Unearthing the Family Gems: Design Requirements for a Digital Reminiscing System for Older Adults. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI EA '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1715--1720. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223698Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Ashima Thomas, Abhi Kumar, Race Krehel, Kay Vasey, Eng Tat Khoo, Tim Marsh, and Benjamin Li Junting. 2018. Oceans We Make: Immersive VR Storytelling. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2018 Virtual amp; Augmented Reality (Tokyo, Japan) (SA '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3275495.3275513Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Blair Thompson, Jody Koenig Kellas, Jordan Soliz, Jason Thompson, Amber Epp, and Paul Schrodt. 2009. Family legacies: Constructing individual and family identity through intergenerational storytelling. Narrative Inquiry 19, 1 (2009), 106--134. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni. 19.1.07thoGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Maryam Tohidi, William Buxton, Ronald Baecker, and Abigail Sellen. 2006. User sketches: a quick, inexpensive, and effective way to elicit more reflective user feedback. 105--114. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182487Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Seiki Tokunaga, Kazuhiro Tamura, and Mihoko Otake-Matsuura. 2021. A dialogue-based system with photo and storytelling for older adults: toward daily cognitive training. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8 (2021), 644964.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Asimina Vasalou, Sara Kalantari, Natalia Kucirkova, and Yvonne Vezzoli. 2020. Designing for oral storytelling practices at home: A parental perspective. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 26 (2020), 100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Torben Wallbaum, Matthias Esser, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2016. StoryBox: Design of a System to Support Experience Sharing through Visual Stories. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Gothenburg, Sweden) (NordiCHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 97, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2996732Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Chien-Yao Wang, Alexey Bochkovskiy, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao. 2022. YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.02696 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. David West, Aaron Quigley, and Judy Kay. 2007. MEMENTO: a digital-physical scrapbook for memory sharing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 4 (2007), 313--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Linda Worrall, Louise Hickson, Heather Barnett, and Edwin Yiu. 1998. An evaluation of the Keep on Talking program for maintaining communication skills into old age. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly 24, 2 (1998), 129--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Bo Xie, Allison Druin, Jerry Fails, Sheri Massey, Evan Golub, Sonia Franckel, and Kiki Schneider. 2012. Connecting generations: developing co-design methods for older adults and children. Behaviour & Information Technology 31, 4 (2012), 413--423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Binxin Yang, Shuyang Gu, Bo Zhang, Ting Zhang, Xuejin Chen, Xiaoyan Sun, Dong Chen, and Fang Wen. 2022. Paint by Example: Exemplar-based Image Editing with Diffusion Models. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2211.13227Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Rabia Meryem Yilmaz and Yuksel Goktas. 2017. Using augmented reality technology in storytelling activities: examining elementary students' narrative skill and creativity. Virtual Reality 21 (2017), 75--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Patricia S. Yoder-Wise and Karren Kowalski. 2003. The power of storytelling. Nursing Outlook 51, 1 (2003), 37--42. https://doi.org/10.1067/mno.2003.2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, and Alexei A Efros. 2016. Colorful image colorization. In European conference on computer vision. Springer, 649--666.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Zhiying Zhou, Adrian David Cheok, JiunHorng Pan, and Yu Li. 2004. Magic Story Cube: an interactive tangible interface for storytelling. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology. 364--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Opportunities of AR for Enriching Storytelling with Family Photos between Grandparents and Grandchildren

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 7, Issue 3
      September 2023
      1734 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3626192
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 September 2023
      Published in imwut Volume 7, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader