skip to main content
10.1145/3610419.3610450acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design and Evaluation of Wearable Haptics Device for Weight Perception in Vocational Trade

Published:02 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wearable devices have a good role in haptics and Virtual Reality (VR) technologies. Weight perception during the VR interactions would give a more realistic immersive experience to the user and that would give psycho-motor skill training. User performance is another aspect that would add to the advantages of wearable haptic devices. Scaffolding work is a very complex assembling task in the construction industry and proper training is insufficient in this area. The technology-based training would be helpful for reducing accidents and improving the outcome. So VR-based solutions along with wearable haptics would be the best option for this. This paper described the design and prototype development of a wearable haptic device based on the systematic approach that can be used for scaffolding work. This paper also reported the user experiments conducted with the participants and presented their experiences. These studies revealed the details of the weight perception and comfort level of the participants when experiencing the device.

References

  1. 2018. New-Model-Curriculum-Foreman-Scaffolding. Retrieved Jan 30, 2023 from https://www.csdcindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/New-Model-Curriculum-Foreman-Scaffolding.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Adilzhan Adilkhanov, Matteo Rubagotti, and Zhanat Kappassov. 2022. Haptic Devices: Wearability-Based Taxonomy and Literature Review. IEEE Access 10 (2022), 91923–91947. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3202986Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nagarajan Akshay, Sasi Deepu, E.S. Rahul, R. Ranjith, James Jose, R. Unnikrishnan, and Rao R. Bhavani. 2013. Design and Evaluation of a Haptic Simulator for Vocational Skill Training and Assessment. In IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. 6108–6113. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2013.6700139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bolhuis Bm, Gielen Cc, and van Ingen Schenau Gj. 1998. Activation Patterns of Mono- and Bi-Articular Arm Muscles as a Function of Force and Movement Direction of the Wrist in Humans. The Journal of physiology 508 (Pt 1), Pt 1 (April 1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.313br.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Eric E. Brodie. 1988. Sex and Hand-Preference Effects in the Simultaneous and Consecutive Discrimination of Lifted Weight. Perception & Psychophysics 43, 4 (July 1988), 326–330. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208802Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. G.C. Burdea. 2000. Haptics Issues in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings Computer Graphics International 2000. 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1109/CGI.2000.852345Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Manuel Caeiro-Rodríguez, Iván Otero-González, Fernando A. Mikic-Fonte, and Martín Llamas-Nistal. 2021. A Systematic Review of Commercial Smart Gloves: Current Status and Applications. Sensors 21, 8 (Jan. 2021), 2667. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082667Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Aimee Sousa Calepso. 2020. A Study on Wrist-Based Haptic Weight Conveyance in Immersive Virtual Environments. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. James R Celestino. 2003. Characterization and Control of a Robot for Wrist Rehabilitation. Retrieved Jan 30, 2023 from https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34132?show=fullGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rachel Collins, Sijie Zhang, Kyungki Kim, and Jochen Teizer. 2014. Integration of Safety Risk Factors in BIM for Scaffolding Construction. In Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014). American Society of Civil Engineers, Orlando, Florida, United States, 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413616.039Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Emel Demircan. 2020. A Pilot Study on Locomotion Training via Biomechanical Models and a Wearable Haptic Feedback System. ROBOMECH Journal 7, 1 (April 2020), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40648-020-00167-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Erkan Dogan, Mehmet Ali Yurdusev, Sadik Alper Yildizel, and Gokhan Calis. 2021. Investigation of Scaffolding Accident in a Construction Site: A Case Study Analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis 120 (Feb. 2021), 105108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Rudolfs Drillis, Renato Contini, and Maurice Bluestein. 1964. Body segment parameters. Artificial limbs 8, 1 (1964), 44–66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Exii. 2018. Exii Releases EXOS Wrist DK2 | Exiii | Wearable Haptic Technology for XR. Retrieved Jan 30, 2023 from https://exiii.jp/2018/10/02/exos_wrist_dk2_en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jakob Fröhner, Gionata Salvietti, Philipp Beckerle, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2019. Can Wearable Haptic Devices Foster the Embodiment of Virtual Limbs?IEEE Transactions on Haptics 12, 3 (July 2019), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2018.2889497Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ronan Hinchet, Velko Vechev, Herbert Shea, and Otmar Hilliges. 2018. DextrES: Wearable Haptic Feedback for Grasping in VR via a Thin Form-Factor Electrostatic Brake. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, Berlin Germany, 901–912. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242657Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Seungwoo Je, Hyelip Lee, Myung Jin Kim, and Andrea Bianchi. 2018. Wind-Blaster: A Wearable Propeller-Based Prototype That Provides Ungrounded Force-Feedback. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Emerging Technologies. ACM, Vancouver British Columbia Canada, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3214907.3214915Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. James Jose, R Unnikrishnan, Delmar Marshall, and Rao R. Bhavani. 2016. Haptics Enhanced Multi-Tool Virtual Interfaces for Training Carpentry Skills. In 2016 International Conference on Robotics and Automation for Humanitarian Applications (RAHA). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/RAHA.2016.7931900Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Gökhan Kazar and Semra Çomu. 2022. Developing A Virtual Safety Training Tool for Scaffolding and Formwork Activities. Teknik Dergi (March 2022). https://doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.711091Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Charles Lambelet, Mingxing Lyu, Daniel Woolley, Roger Gassert, and Nicole Wenderoth. 2017. The eWrist - A Wearable Wrist Exoskeleton with sEMG-based Force Control for Stroke Rehabilitation. IEEE... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics: [proceedings] 2017 (July 2017), 726–733. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009334Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Balu M. Menon, Menon Mahima, Rao R. Bhavani, Sasi Deepu, Mohan T. Harish, R. Unnikrishnan, Manikutty Gayathri, Sangiorgio Marco, S. Shanker, Prathap Vishnu, and S. Nishok. 2017. Virtual Rebar Bending Training Environment with Haptics Feedback. In Proceedings of the Advances in Robotics on - AIR ’17. ACM Press, New Delhi, India, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132446.3134901Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Domenico Prattichizzo, Miguel Otaduy, Hiroyuki Kajimoto, and Claudio Pacchierotti. 2019. Wearable and Hand-Held Haptics. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 12, 3 (July 2019), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2019.2936736Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P Rohith, S Krishnachandran, Sasi Deepu, and Rao R Bhavani. 2022. A Study on the Development of a VR-Haptics Training Module for Cup-Lock Scaffolding. In 2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). 314–316. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00100Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. M. Salada, P. Vishton, J.E. Colgate, and E. Frankel. 2004. Two Experiments on the Perception of Slip at the Fingertip. In 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS ’04. Proceedings.146–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2004.1287190Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Hsin-Ruey Tsai, Jun Rekimoto, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2019. ElasticVR: Providing Multilevel Continuously-Changing Resistive Force and Instant Impact Using Elasticity for VR. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300450Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Design and Evaluation of Wearable Haptics Device for Weight Perception in Vocational Trade

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AIR '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Advances in Robotics
        July 2023
        583 pages
        ISBN:9781450399807
        DOI:10.1145/3610419

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 November 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format