skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Digital Legacy: A Systematic Literature Review

Published:04 October 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

To more effectively support the dying and bereaved in end-of-life contexts, over the past two decades HCI and social computing scholars have sought to understand digital legacy. In this paper, we argue that it is time to take stock of digital legacy scholarship, examining what we know, what gaps remain, and what areas are imperative for future work. Through a Grounded Theory Literature Review, we identify four foci in digital legacy research to date: how identity is navigated in the passing of digital legacy, how digital legacies are engaged with, how digital legacies are put to rest, and how technology interfaces with offline legacy technologies. Based on our analysis, we present a model depicting how digital legacy research examines a lifecycle of data as it is passed down. This model identifies that digital legacy data moves through three stages: encoding, accessing, and dispossessing. The model illustrates gaps in current research and charts possible inflection points for future social computing research. Specifically, we highlight the importance of multi-user and multi-generational networks of people in end-of-life scenarios. Additionally, the model exhibits emerging theoretical findings and major concepts in the nascent field of digital legacy research.

References

  1. 2022. Google Scholar: Top Publishers in HCI. Queried 11/15/22. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_ op=top_venues&hl=de&vq=eng_humancomputerinteractionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mark S. Ackerman. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human--Computer Interaction 15, 2--3 (Sept. 2000), 179--203. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_ 5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. A. Adams and S. A. Williams. 2014. What's Yours Is Mine and What's Mine's My Own: Joint Accounts and Digital Identity. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 44, 1 (April 2014), 15--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602147. 2602150Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Richard Banks, David Kirk, and Abigail Sellen. 2012. A design perspective on three technology heirlooms. Human-- Computer Interaction 27, 1--2 (2012), 63--91. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F07370024.2012.656042Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eric P. S. Baumer and Jed R. Brubaker. 2017. Post-Userism. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Denver Colorado USA, 6291--6303. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025740Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Genevieve Bell. 2006. No More SMS from Jesus: Ubicomp, Religion and Techno-spiritual Practices. In UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, David Hutchison, Takeo Kanade, Josef Kittler, Jon M. Kleinberg, Friedemann Mattern, John C. Mitchell, Moni Naor, Oscar Nierstrasz, C. Pandu Rangan, Bernhard Steffen, Madhu Sudan, Demetri Terzopoulos, Dough Tygar, Moshe Y. Vardi, Gerhard Weikum, Paul Dourish, and Adrian Friday (Eds.). Vol. 4206. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 141--158. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853565_9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jed R. Brubaker and Vanessa Callison-Burch. 2016. Legacy Contact: Designing and Implementing Post-mortem Stewardship at Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 2908--2919. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858254Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn S. Dombrowski, Anita M. Gilbert, Nafiri Kusumakaulika, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2014. Stewarding a Legacy: Responsibilities and Relationships in the Management of Post-Mortem Data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Toronto Ontario Canada, 4157--4166. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/2556288.2557059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jed R. Brubaker, Gillian R. Hayes, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2019. Orienting to Networked Grief: Situated Perspectives of Communal Mourning on Facebook. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359129Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Natalie Ceeney. 2008. The Role of a 21st-Century National Archive-The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists 29, 1 (April 2008), 57--71. https: //doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499868Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Janet X. Chen, Francesco Vitale, and Joanna McGrenere. 2021. What Happens After Death? Using a Design Workbook to Understand User Expectations for Preparing Their Data. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445359Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Munmun De Choudhury, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Major Life Changes and Behavioral Markers in Social Media: Case of Childbirth. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, San Antonio Texas USA, 1431--1442. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441937Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. KL Denny Ho, Yanki Lee, and Julia Cassim. 2009. What if. . . users do not know how to be inclusive through design. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Inclusive Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. P. Djajadiningrat, W. W. Gaver, and J. W. Fres. 2000. Interaction Relabelling and Extreme Characters: Methods for Exploring Aesthetic Interactions. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. ACM, New York City New York USA, 66--71. https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347664Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Katie Z. Gach and Jed R. Brubaker. 2020. Experiences of Trust in Postmortem Profile Management. ACM Transactions on Social Computing 3, 1 (March 2020), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365525Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Katie Z. Gach and Jed R. Brubaker. 2021. Getting Your Facebook Affairs in Order: User Expectations in Post-mortem Profile Management. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss. 1967. Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology the journal of the British sociological association 12, 1 (1967), 27--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jonathan Grudin. 1994. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Commun. ACM 37, 1 (Jan. 1994), 92--105. https://doi.org/10.1145/175222.175230Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rebecca Gulotta, David B. Gerritsen, Aisling Kelliher, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2016. Engaging with Death Online: An Analysis of Systems That Support Legacy-Making, Bereavement, and Remembrance. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Brisbane QLD Australia, 736--748. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901802Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rebecca Gulotta, Aisling Kelliher, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2017. Digital Systems and the Experience of Legacy. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Edinburgh United Kingdom, 663--674. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064731Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rebecca Gulotta, William Odom, Haakon Faste, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Legacy in the Age of the Internet: Reflections on How Interactive Systems Shape How We Are Remembered. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 975--984. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598579Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rebecca Gulotta, William Odom, Jodi Forlizzi, and Haakon Faste. 2013. Digital Artifacts as Legacy: Exploring the Lifespan and Value of Digital Data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Paris France, 1813--1822. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466240Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Oliver L. Haimson, Bryan Semaan, Brianna Dym, Joey Chiao-Yin Hsiao, Daniel Herron, and Wendy Moncur. 2019. Life Transitions and Social Technologies: Research and Design for Times of Life Change. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Austin TX USA, 480--486. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359431Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jonna Häkkilä, Ashley Colley, and Matilda Kalving. 2019. Designing an Interactive Gravestone Display. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, Palermo Italy, 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324952Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Feng Han, Yifei Cheng, Megan Strachan, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2021. Hybrid Paper-Digital Interfaces: A Systematic Literature Review. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. ACM, Virtual Event USA, 1087--1100. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jack Holt, James Nicholson, and Jan David Smeddinck. 2021. From Personal Data to Digital Legacy: Exploring Conflicts in the Sharing, Security and Privacy of Post-mortem Data. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. ACM, Ljubljana Slovenia, 2745--2756. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3450030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Elizabeth G. Hunter. 2008. Beyond Death: Inheriting the Past and Giving to the Future, Transmitting the Legacy of One's Self. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying 56, 4 (June 2008), 313--329. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.56.4.aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sue Jamison-Powell, Pam Briggs, Shaun Lawson, Conor Linehan, Karen Windle, and Harriet Gross. 2016. "PS. I Love You": Understanding the Impact of Posthumous Digital Messages. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 2920--2932. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858504Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Joseph ?Jofish' Kaye, Janet Vertesi, Shari Avery, Allan Dafoe, Shay David, Lisa Onaga, Ivan Rosero, and Trevor Pinch. 2006. To Have and to Hold: Exploring the Personal Archive. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montréal Québec Canada, 275--284. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124814Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. David S. Kirk and Abigail Sellen. 2010. On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 17, 3 (July 2010), 1--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/1806923.1806924Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Tianxiao Liu, Jasmine Glover, and Oliver L. Haimson. 2020. Reasons for Sharing With Separate Social Media Audiences During Life Transitions. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Virtual Event USA, 329--334. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3418306Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Michael E. Locasto, Michael Massimi, and Peter J. DePasquale. 2011. Security and Privacy Considerations in Digital Death. In Proceedings of the 2011 New Security Paradigms Workshop. ACM, Marin County California USA, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2073276.2073278Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rachel M. Magee, Denise E. Agosto, and Andrea Forte. 2017. Four Factors That Regulate Teen Technology Use in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Portland Oregon USA, 511--522. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998310Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Michael Massimi and Ronald M. Baecker. 2010. A Death in the Family: Opportunities for Designing Technologies for the Bereaved. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Atlanta Georgia USA, 1821--1830. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753600Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Michael Massimi, Jackie L. Bender, Holly O. Witteman, and Osman H. Ahmed. 2014. Life Transitions and Online Health Communities: Reflecting on Adoption, Use, and Disengagement. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, Baltimore Maryland USA, 1491--1501. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531622Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Michael Massimi, William Odom, Richard Banks, and David Kirk. 2011. Matters of Life and Death: Locating the End of Life in Lifespan-Oriented Hci Research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 987--996. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979090Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Wendy Moncur, Lorna Gibson, and Daniel Herron. 2016. The Role of Digital Technologies During Relationship Breakdowns. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, San Francisco California USA, 371--382. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819925Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wendy Moncur and David Kirk. 2014. An Emergent Framework for Digital Memorials. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 965--974. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598516Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Francisco Nunes, Nervo Verdezoto, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Morten Kyng, Erik Grönvall, and Cristiano Storni. 2015. Self-Care Technologies in HCI: Trends, Tensions, and Opportunities. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22, 6 (Dec. 2015), 1--45. https://doi.org/10.1145/2803173Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. William Odom, Richard Banks, David Kirk, Richard Harper, Siân Lindley, and Abigail Sellen. 2012. Technology Heirlooms?: Considerations for Passing down and Inheriting Digital Materials. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Austin Texas USA, 337--346. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207723Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Joachim Pfister. 2017. "This Will Cause a Lot of Work.": Coping with Transferring Files and Passwords as Part of a Personal Digital Legacy. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Portland Oregon USA, 1123--1138. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998262Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2011. Second-Hand Interactions: Investigating Reacquisition and Dispossession Practices around Domestic Objects. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 2385--2394. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979291Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Amon Rapp, Lorenzo Curti, and Arianna Boldi. 2021. The Human Side of Human-Chatbot Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review of Ten Years of Research on Text-Based Chatbots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 151 (July 2021), 102630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102630Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Wan-Jou She, Panote Siriaraya, Chee Siang Ang, and Holly Gwen Prigerson. 2021. Living Memory Home: Understanding Continuing Bond in the Digital Age through Backstage Grieving. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445336Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Lisa Thomas and Pam Briggs. 2014. An Older Adult Perspective on Digital Legacy. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. ACM, Helsinki Finland, 237--246. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639485Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Daisuke Uriu, Noriyasu Obushi, Zendai Kashino, Atsushi Hiyama, and Masahiko Inami. 2021. Floral Tribute Ritual in Virtual Reality: Design and Validation of SenseVase with Virtual Memorial. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445216Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Daisuke Uriu and William Odom. 2016. Designing for Domestic Memorialization and Remembrance: A Field Study of Fenestra in Japan. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 5945--5957. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Daisuke Uriu, William Odom, and Hannah Gould. 2018. Understanding Automatic Conveyor-belt Columbaria: Emerging Sites of Interactive Memorialization in Japan. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Hong Kong China, 747--752. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196801Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Daisuke Uriu, William Odom, Mei-Kei Lai, Sai Taoka, and Masahiko Inami. 2018. SenseCenser: An Interactive Device for Sensing Incense Smoke & Supporting Memorialization Rituals in Japan. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Hong Kong China, 315--318. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3205394Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Daisuke Uriu, Kenta Toshima, Minori Manabe, Takeru Yazaki, Takeshi Funatsu, Atsushi Izumihara, Zendai Kashino, Atsushi Hiyama, and Masahiko Inami. 2021. Generating the Presence of Remote Mourners: A Case Study of Funeral Webcasting in Japan. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445617Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Joost F Wolfswinkel, Elfi Furtmueller, and Celeste P M Wilderom. 2013. Using Grounded Theory as a Method for Rigorously Reviewing Literature. European Journal of Information Systems 22, 1 (Jan. 2013), 45--55. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.51Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Digital Legacy: A Systematic Literature Review

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader