skip to main content
10.1145/3606094.3606134acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigating the Effects of Different L2 Caption Types on Young Learners’ Incidental Vocabulary Learning

Published:29 August 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Captioned videos plays an important role in incidental vocabulary learning and retention. However, to date there has been limited research on how they affected young learners’ word acquisition. The present study examines the effectiveness of four captioning conditions, i.e., glossed captions, full captions, keyword captions, and no captioning, on incidental vocabulary learning and retention. A total of 125 young learners of English as a foreign language, divided into four groups, watched four videos and completed two vocabulary tests, i.e., form recognition and meaning recall, administered as pretest, post-test, and delayed test. The results showed that captioning types, particularly glossed captions, significantly affects incidental vocabulary learning and retention. And pedagogically relevant implications and limitations were discussed based on the results.

References

  1. Kress, G. 2005. Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge and learning. Computers and Composition, 22, 5–22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. 2014. Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 118–141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Webb, S., & Nation, I. S. P. 2017. How vocabulary is learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Koolstra, C. M., Beentjes, J. W. 1999. Children's vocabulary acquisition in a foreign language through watching subtitled television programs at home. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47, 51-60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hulstijn, J. H. 2013. Incidental learning in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics (pp. 2632-2640). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Teng, F. 2018a. A learner-based approach of applying online reading to improve learner autonomy and lexical knowledge. Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31, 104-134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Webb, S., & Chang, A. C-S. 2015. Second language vocabulary learning through extensive reading: How does frequency and distribution of occurrence affect learning? Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 667-686.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hulstijn, J. H. 2001. Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rott, S. 2007. The effect of frequency of input-enhancements on word learning and text comprehension. Language Learning, 57, 165-199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Danan, M. 2004. Captioning and subtitling: Undervalued language learning strategies. Meta: Translators’ Journal, 49, 67-77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Vanderplank, R. 2016. ‘Effects of’ and ‘effects with’ captions: How exactly does watching a TV programme with same-language subtitles make a difference to language learners? Language Teaching, 49(2), 235-250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Montero Perez, M. M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. 2018. Vocabulary learning through viewing video: The effect of two enhancement techniques. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31, 1-26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Teng, F. 2017. Flipping the classroom and tertiary level EFL students’ academic performance and satisfaction. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(4), 605-620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Winke, P., Gass, S. M., & Sydorenko, T. 2010. The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 65-86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. 2005. The multimedia principle. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 117–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Paivio, A. 1986. Mental representation: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Krashen, S. D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Neuman, S. B., & Koskinen, P. 1992. Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 95–106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Peters, E., Heynen, E., & Puimège, E. 2016. Learning vocabulary through audiovisual input: The differential effect of L1 subtitles and captions. System, 63, 134-148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. MC Cintrón-Valentín, & L García-Amaya. 2021. Investigating textual enhancement and captions in l2 grammar and vocabulary: an experimental study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tyler, M. D., Jones, C., Grebennikov, L., Leigh, G., Noble, W., & Burnham, D. 2009. Effect of caption rate on the comprehension of educational television programmes by deaf school students. Deafness & Education International, 11(3), 152-162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Heatley, A., & Nation, I. S. P. 1996 Range [computer software]. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington. (Available from http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Montero Perez, M. M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. 2013. Is less more? Effectiveness and perceived usefulness of keyword and full captioned video for L2 listening comprehension. ReCALL, 26, 21-43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Guillory, H. G. 1998. The effects of keyword captions to authentic French video on learner comprehension. CALICO Journal, 15, 89-108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Investigating the Effects of Different L2 Caption Types on Young Learners’ Incidental Vocabulary Learning
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ICDEL '23: Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning
              June 2023
              353 pages
              ISBN:9798400700422
              DOI:10.1145/3606094

              Copyright © 2023 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 29 August 2023

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format