skip to main content
10.1145/3604078.3604100acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lightweight Multi-scale Transformer for Automatic Skin Lesions Segmentation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Automatic segmentation of skin lesions is of great significance for assisting doctors in early diagnosis. However, due to these problems such as color, size, boundary blur, low contrast, and hair occlusion, it is more difficult to automatically segment skin diseases. In order to overcome these challenges, reduce the missed diagnosis rate and misdiagnosis rate, prevent patients from missing the best treatment period, and improve patient survival. We proposed a new lightweight network based on multi-scale Transformer, which extracts rich global context dependencies through the multi-scale Transformer of four parallel paths, and adds a simple boundary enhancement structure to the last layer of the network as local information , and finally segmented by a layer-by-layer decoding structure. A large number of experiments were carried out on four public data sets. Through the analysis of objective evaluation indicators, our method has improved compared with other excellent methods. From the comparison of visual effects, we can also see that our method is more accurate in boundary segmentation. Our method improved the segmentation accuracy and reduces the scale of the model, which is conducive to the rapid automatic segmentation of skin diseases, assists skin doctors in diagnosis, and improves efficiency and accuracy.

References

  1. Atique, U., Mushtaq, S., Rana, I. A., & Hassan, U. (2020). Clinicopathologic Features of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma and Their Impact on Prognosis. Cureus, 12(9).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mishra N K, Celebi M E. An overview of melanoma detection in dermoscopy images using image processing and machine learning[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.07843, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[C]//Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18. Springer International Publishing, 2015: 234-241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2015: 3431-3440.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sengupta S, Mittal N, Modi M. Improved skin lesion edge detection method using Ant Colony Optimization[J]. Skin Research and Technology, 2019, 25(6): 846-856.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashour A S, Guo Y, Kucukkulahli E, A hybrid dermoscopy images segmentation approach based on neutrosophic clustering and histogram estimation[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2018, 69: 426-434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Divya D, Ganeshbabu T R. Fitness adaptive deer hunting‐based region growing and recurrent neural network for melanoma skin cancer detection[J]. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 2020, 30(3): 731-752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hu K, Liu S, Zhang Y, A skin lesion segmentation method based on saliency and adaptive thresholding in wavelet domain[J]. Cognitive Internet of Things: Frameworks, Tools and Applications, 2020: 445-453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao M, Chen H, Zheng S, Feature fusion and non-negative matrix factorization based active contours for texture segmentation[J]. Signal Processing, 2019, 159: 104-118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Xie F, Yang J, Liu J, Skin lesion segmentation using high-resolution convolutional neural network[J]. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2020, 186: 105241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Noël Richard, Christine Fernandez-Maloigne, Cristian Bonanomi, and Alessandro Rizzi, "Fuzzy Color Image Segmentation using Watershed Transform," Journal of Image and Graphics, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 157-160, September 2013. doi: 10.12720/joig.1.3.157-160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mohammad Rezaee and Mohammad Bagher Tavakoli, "Cancerous Masses Segmentation by Using Heuristic Ant Colony Algorithms in Medical Images," Journal of Image and Graphics, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 128-134, December 2014. doi: 10.12720/joig.2.2.128-134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lv P, Wang J, Wang H. 2.5 D lightweight RIU-Net for automatic liver and tumor segmentation from CT[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2022, 75: 103567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Zhou Z, Rahman Siddiquee M M, Tajbakhsh N, Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation[C]//Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support: 4th International Workshop, DLMIA 2018, and 8th International Workshop, ML-CDS 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 20, 2018, Proceedings 4. Springer International Publishing, 2018: 3-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ibtehaz N, Rahman M S. MultiResUNet: Rethinking the U-Net architecture for multimodal biomedical image segmentation[J]. Neural networks, 2020, 121: 74-87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee H J, Kim J U, Lee S, Structure boundary preserving segmentation for medical image with ambiguous boundary[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2020: 4817-4826.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yuki Enokiya, Yutaro Iwamoto, Yen-Wei Chen, and Xian-Hua Han, "Automatic Liver Segmentation Using U-Net with Wasserstein GANs," Journal of Image and Graphics, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 152-159, December 2018. doi: 10.18178/joig.6.2.152-159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Wu H, Chen S, Chen G, FAT-Net: Feature adaptive transformers for automated skin lesion segmentation[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2022, 76: 102327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Wang J, Wei L, Wang L, Boundary-aware transformers for skin lesion segmentation[C]//Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part I 24. Springer International Publishing, 2021: 206-216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang Y, Liu H, Hu Q. Transfuse: Fusing transformers and cnns for medical image segmentation[C]//Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part I 24. Springer International Publishing, 2021: 14-24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang H, Xie S, Lin L, Mixed transformer u-net for medical image segmentation[C]//ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2022: 2390-2394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen J, Lu Y, Yu Q, Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee Y, Kim J, Willette J, Mpvit: Multi-path vision transformer for dense prediction[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2022: 7287-7296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Dai Z, Liu H, Le Q V, Coatnet: Marrying convolution and attention for all data sizes[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021, 34: 3965-3977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Chu X, Tian Z, Zhang B, Conditional positional encodings for vision transformers[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.10882, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Teresa Mendon¸ ca, Pedro M Ferreira, Jorge S Marques, Andr´ e RS Marcal, and Jorge Rozeira. Ph 2-a dermoscopic image database for research and benchmarking. In 2013 35th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), pages 5437–5440. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. Gutman, N. C. F. Codella, M. E. Celebi, B. Helba, M. A. Marchetti, N. K. Mishra, and A. Halpern, “Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: A challenge at the international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI) 2016, hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (ISIC),” arXiv, 2016. [Online]. Available: arXiv:1605.01397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. N. C. F. Codella, D. Gutman, M. E. Celebi, B. Helba, M. A. Marchetti, S. W. Dusza, A. Kalloo, K. Liopyris, N. K. Mishra, H. Kittler, and A. Halpern, “Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: A challenge at the 2017 international symposium on biomedical imaging (isbi), hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (ISIC),” IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Codella, eronica Rotemberg, Philipp Tschandl, M Emre Celebi, Stephen Dusza, David Gutman, Brian Helba, Aadi Kalloo, Konstantinos Liopyris,18 Michael Marchetti, Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection 2018:A challenge hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (isic). arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03368, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Lightweight Multi-scale Transformer for Automatic Skin Lesions Segmentation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICDIP '23: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Digital Image Processing
      May 2023
      711 pages
      ISBN:9798400708237
      DOI:10.1145/3604078

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format