skip to main content
10.1145/3603269.3604841acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Resilient Baseband Processing in Virtualized RANs with Slingshot

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In cellular networks, there is a growing adoption of virtualized radio access networks (vRANs), where operators are replacing the traditional specialized hardware for RAN processing with software running on commodity servers. Today's vRAN deployments lack resilience, since there is no support for vRAN failover or upgrades without long service interruptions. Enabling these features for vRANs is challenging because of their strict real-time latency requirements and black-box nature. Slingshot is a new system that transparently provides resilience for the vRAN's most performance-critical layer: the physical layer (PHY). We design new techniques for realtime workload migration with fast RAN protocol middle-boxes, and realtime RAN failure detection. A key insight in our design is to view the transient disruptions from resilience events to RAN computation state and I/O similarly to regular wireless signal impairments, and leverage the inherent resilience of cellular networks to these events. Experiments with a state-of-the-art 5G vRAN testbed show that Slingshot handles PHY failover with no disruption to video conferencing, and under 110 ms disruption to a TCP connection, and it also enables zero-downtime upgrades.

References

  1. 2016. QEMU RDMA Live Migration. https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/RDMALiveMigrationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2020. Arista: 7170 Series Technical Specifications and Features. https://www.arista.com/en/products/7170-series/specifications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2020. iperf(1) - Linux man page. https://linux.die.net/man/1/iperf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2020. QEMU - A generic and open source machine emulator and virtualizer. https://www.qemu.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2021. Altiostar and Rakuten Mobile Demonstrate Success Across Performance and Scalability for Open RAN Network. https://www.altiostar.com/altiostar-and-rakuten-mobile-demonstrate-success-across-performance-and-scalability-for-open-ran-network/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2021. CapGemini 5G gNodeB. https://capgemini-engineering.com/nl/en/services/next-core/wireless-frameworks/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 2021. Cloud Architecture and Deployment Scenarios for O-RAN Virtualized RAN. https://www.o-ran.org/specifications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 2021. Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK). http://dpdk.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 2021. Deutsche Telekom lights open RAN test site. https://www.mobileworldlive.com/featured-content/top-three/dt-openran-testbed/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 2021. FlexRAN™ Reference Architecture for Wireless Access. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/topic-technology/edge-5g/tools/flexran.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 2021. Kernel Virtual Machine. https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Main_Page.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 2021. O-RAN Alliance: Operator Defined Open and Intelligent Radio Access Networks. https://www.o-ran.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 2021. O-RAN Hardware Reference Design Specification for Indoor Pico Cell with Fronthaul Split Option 6. https://www.o-ran.org/specifications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 2021. O-RAN: Towards an Open and Smart RAN. https://www.o-ran.org/s/O-RAN-WP-FInal-181017.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 2021. P416 Language Specification. https://p4.org/p4-spec/docs/P4-16-v1.2.0.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 2021. Radisys 5G NR Software Suite. https://www.radisys.com/connect/connectran/5g.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 2021. SRS: Software Radio Systems. https://www.srs.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 2021. vSphere Performance Equivalent to Bare Metal for RAN Workloads. https://telco.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/microsites/telco/vmware-telco-ran-performance-wp.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 2022. 5G FAPI: PHY API specification. https://www.smallcellforum.org/reports/5g-fapi-phy-api-specification.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 2022. 5G nFAPI specifications. https://www.smallcellforum.org/reports/5g-nfapi-specifications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 2022. NVIDIA Aerial SDK: Build and Deploy GPU-Accelerated 5G Virtual Radio Access Networks (vRAN). https://developer.nvidia.com/aerial-sdk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 2022. Qualcomm Introduces New 5G Distributed Unit Accelerator Card to Drive Global 5G Virtualized RAN Growth. https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2021/06/qualcomm-introduces-new-5g-distributed-unit-accelerator-card-drive-global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 2022. Rakuten Symphony Symware™ Phase Two Begins with Plans to Commercially Deploy 30,000 Units in Japan. https://symphony.rakuten.com/newsroom/rakuten-symphony-symware-phase-two-begins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 2022. The Journey to a Cloud-native, Fully Software-defined vRAN Architecture. https://www.vodafone.com/sites/default/files/2022-12/journey-to-cloud-native-fully-software-defined-vran-architecture.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 2022. Verizon deploys more than 8,000 VRAN cell sites, rapidly marches towards goal of 20,000. https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-deploys-more-8000-vran-cell-sites.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 2022. Vodafone turns on first U.K. 5G open RAN site. https://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/vodafone-turns-first-uk-5g-open-ran-site.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Marcos K. Aguilera, Naama Ben-David, Rachid Guerraoui, Virendra J. Marathe, Athanasios Xygkis, and Igor Zablotchi. 2020. Microsecond Consensus for Microsecond Applications. In 14th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 20). USENIX Association, 599--616. https://www.usenix.org/conference/osdi20/presentation/aguileraGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kazi Main Uddin Ahmed, Manuel Alvarez, and Math H. J. Bollen. 2020. Characterizing Failure and Repair Time of Servers in a Hyper-scale Data Center. In IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe, ISGT Europe 2020, Delft, The Netherlands, October 26--28, 2020. IEEE, 660--664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jesutofunmi Ademiposi Ajayi. 2019. Live eNodeB Container Migration in LTE Mobile Networks. Master's thesis. University of Bern.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sally R. Aldaeabool and Maysam F. Abbod. 2017. Reducing power consumption by dynamic BBUs-RRHs allocation in C-RAN. In 2017 25th Telecommunication Forum (TELFOR). 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. ORAN Alliance. 2022. Control, user and synchronization plane specification. O-RAN Fronthaul Working Group, ORAN-WG4.CUS.0-v10.00 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. M. Baker-Harvey. 2015. Google Compute Engine uses Live Migration technology to service infrastructure without application downtime. https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2015/03/Google-Compute-Engine-uses-Live-Migration-technology-to-service-infrastructure-without-application-downtime.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Robert Birke, Ioana Giurgiu, Lydia Y. Chen, Dorothea Wiesmann, and Ton Engbersen. 2014. Failure Analysis of Virtual and Physical Machines: Patterns, Causes and Characteristics. In 2014 44th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Nishant Budhdev, Raj Joshi, Pravein Govindan Kannan, Mun Choon Chan, and Tulika Mitra. 2021. FSA: Fronthaul Slicing Architecture for 5G Using Dataplane Programmable Switches. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 723--735. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Yi Chen, Di Tang, Yepeng Yao, Mingming Zha, XiaoFeng Wang, Xiaozhong Liu, Haixu Tang, and Dongfang Zhao. 2022. Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Understanding Security Hazards in the 3GPP Ecosystem through Intelligent Analysis on Change Requests. In 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22). USENIX Association, Boston, MA, 17--34. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity22/presentation/chen-yiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Josep Colom Ikuno, Martin Wrulich, and Markus Rupp. 2009. Performance and modeling of LTE H-ARQ. International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas (WSA 2009) (01 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Michael Dalton, David Schultz, Jacob Adriaens, Ahsan Arefin, Anshuman Gupta, Brian Fahs, Dima Rubinstein, Enrique Cauich Zermeno, Erik Rubow, James Alexander Docauer, Jesse Alpert, Jing Ai, Jon Olson, Kevin DeCabooter, Marc de Kruijf, Nan Hua, Nathan Lewis, Nikhil Kasinadhuni, Riccardo Crepaldi, Srinivas Krishnan, Subbaiah Venkata, Yossi Richter, Uday Naik, and Amin Vahdat. 2018. Andromeda: Performance, Isolation, and Velocity at Scale in Cloud Network Virtualization. In 15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 18). USENIX Association, Renton, WA, 373--387. https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi18/presentation/daltonGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Aleksandar Dragojević, Dushyanth Narayanan, Edmund B. Nightingale, Matthew Renzelmann, Alex Shamis, Anirudh Badam, and Miguel Castro. 2015. No Compromises: Distributed Transactions with Consistency, Availability, and Performance. In Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (Monterey, California) (SOSP '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 54--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Daniel E. Eisenbud, Cheng Yi, Carlo Contavalli, Cody Smith, Roman Kononov, Eric Mann-Hielscher, Ardas Cilingiroglu, Bin Cheyney, Wentao Shang, and Jinnah Dylan Hosein. 2016. Maglev: A Fast and Reliable Software Network Load Balancer. In 13th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 16). USENIX Association, Santa Clara, CA, 523--535. https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi16/technical-sessions/presentation/eisenbudGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Kevin Fall, Gianluca Iannaccone, Maziar Manesh, Sylvia Ratnasamy, Katerina Argyraki, Mihai Dobrescu, and Norbert Egi. 2011. RouteBricks: Enabling General Purpose Network Infrastructure. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 45, 1 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Xenofon Foukas and Bozidar Radunovic. 2021. Concordia: teaching the 5G vRAN to share compute. In ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Conference, Virtual Event, USA, August 23--27, 2021, Fernando A. Kuipers and Matthew C. Caesar (Eds.). ACM, 580--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Gines Garcia-Aviles, Andres Garcia-Saavedra, Marco Gramaglia, Xavier Costa-Perez, Pablo Serrano, and Albert Banchs. 2021. Nuberu: Reliable RAN Virtualization in Shared Platforms. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (New Orleans, Louisiana) (MobiCom '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 749--761. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ahmad Hassan, Arvind Narayanan, Anlan Zhang, Wei Ye, Ruiyang Zhu, Shuowei Jin, Jason Carpenter, Z. Morley Mao, Feng Qian, and Zhi-Li Zhang. 2022. Vivisecting Mobility Management in 5G Cellular Networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (SIGCOMM '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 86--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Steven S. Hong, Jeffrey Mehlman, and Sachin Katti. 2012. Picasso: Flexible RF and Spectrum Slicing. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 42, 4 (aug 2012), 37--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Te-Yuan Huang, Ramesh Johari, Nick McKeown, Matthew Trunnell, and Mark Watson. 2015. A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: Evidence from a large video streaming service. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 44, 4 (2015), 187--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Patrick Jahnke, Vincent Riesop, Pierre-Louis Roman, Pavel Chuprikov, and Patrick Eugster. 2021. Live in the Express Lane. In 2021 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 21). 581--595.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Antonios Katsarakis, Yijun Ma, Zhaowei Tan, Andrew Bainbridge, Matthew Balkwill, Aleksandar Dragojevic, Boris Grot, Bozidar Radunovic, and Yongguang Zhang. 2021. Zeus: Locality-Aware Distributed Transactions. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth European Conference on Computer Systems (Online Event, United Kingdom) (EuroSys '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 145--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Antonios Katsarakis, Zhaowei Tan, Matthew Balkwill, Bozidar Radunovic, Andrew Bainbridge, Aleksandar Dragojevic, Boris Grot, and Yongguang Zhang. [n.d.]. rVNF: Reliable, scalable and performant cellular VNFs in the cloud. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Sean Kenney. [n.d.]. Breaking down the pros of Open RAN. https://www.rcrwireless.com/20200925/5g/breaking-down-the-pros-of-open-ran.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Junaid Khalid and Aditya Akella. 2019. Correctness and Performance for Stateful Chained Network Functions. In USENIX NSDI (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. M. Khan, R.S. Alhumaima, and H.S. Al-Raweshidy. 2015. Quality of Service aware dynamic BBU-RRH mapping in Cloud Radio Access Network. In 2015 International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET). 1--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Yuanjie Li, Zengwen Yuan, and Chunyi Peng. 2017. A Control-Plane Perspective on Reducing Data Access Latency in LTE Networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Snowbird, Utah, USA) (MobiCom '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 56--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Kyle MacMillan, Tarun Mangla, James Saxon, and Nick Feamster. 2021. Measuring the performance and network utilization of popular video conferencing applications. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference. 229--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. José Mendes, Xianjun Jiao, Andres Garcia-Saavedra, Felipe Huici, and Ingrid Moerman. 2017. Cellular Access Multi-Tenancy through Small Cell Virtualization and Common RF Front-End Sharing. 35--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Arvind Narayanan, Eman Ramadan, Jason Carpenter, Qingxu Liu, Yu Liu, Feng Qian, and Zhi-Li Zhang. 2020. A First Look at Commercial 5G Performance on Smartphones. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 894--905.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Binh Nguyen, Tian Zhang, Bozidar Radunovic, Ryan Stutsman, Thomas Karagiannis, Jakub Kocur, and Jacobus Van der Merwe. 2018. ECHO: A Reliable Distributed Cellular Core Network for Hyper-Scale Public Clouds. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (New Delhi, India) (MobiCom '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 163--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Navid Nikaein, Mahesh K. Marina, Saravana Manickam, Alex Dawson, Raymond Knopp, and Christian Bonnet. 2014. OpenAirInterface: A Flexible Platform for 5G Research. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 44, 5 (oct 2014), 33--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Guillermo Pocovi, Hamidreza Shariatmadari, Gilberto Berardinelli, Klaus Pedersen, Jens Steiner, and Zexian Li. 2018. Achieving ultra-reliable low-latency communications: Challenges and envisioned system enhancements. IEEE Network 32, 2 (2018), 8--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Chandra Prakash, Debadatta Mishra, Purushottam Kulkarni, and Umesh Bellur. 2022. Portkey: Hypervisor-Assisted Container Migration in Nested Cloud Environments. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments (Virtual, Switzerland) (VEE 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Qualcomm. 2014. 3GPP RAN2 R2-140089, Mobility Performance in Real Networks. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Mubashir Adnan Qureshi, Ajay Mahimkar, Lili Qiu, Zihui Ge, Max Zhang, and Ioannis Broustis. 2017. Coordinating rolling software upgrades for cellular networks. In 25th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP 2017, Toronto, ON, Canada, October 10--13, 2017. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Shriram Rajagopalan, Dan Williams, and Hani Jamjoom. 2013. Pico replication: A high availability framework for middleboxes. In ACM SoCC (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Ermínio Augusto Ramos da Paixão, Rafael Fogarolli Vieira, Welton Vasconcelos Araújo, and Diego Lisboa Cardoso. 2018. Optimized load balancing by dynamic BBU-RRH mapping in C-RAN architecture. In 2018 Third International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC). 100--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Rehenuma Tasnim Rodoshi, Taewoon Kim, and Wooyeol Choi. 2020. Resource Management in Cloud Radio Access Network: Conventional and New Approaches. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 20 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Adam Ruprecht, Danny Jones, Dmitry Shiraev, Greg Harmon, Maya Spivak, Michael Krebs, Miche Baker-Harvey, and Tyler Sanderson. 2018. VM Live Migration At Scale. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments (Williamsburg, VA, USA) (VEE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Justine Sherry, Peter Xiang Gao, Soumya Basu, Aurojit Panda, Arvind Krishnamurthy, Christian Maciocco, Maziar Manesh, João Martins, Sylvia Ratnasamy, Luigi Rizzo, and Scott Shenker. 2015. Rollback-Recovery for Middle-boxes. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 45, 4 (aug 2015), 227--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Aidan Shribman and Benoit Hudzia. 2012. Pre-copy and post-copy VM live migration for memory intensive applications. In European Conference on Parallel Processing. Springer, 539--547.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Tshiamo Sigwele, Atm S Alam, Prashant Pillai, and Yim F Hu. 2017. Energy-efficient cloud radio access networks by cloud based workload consolidation for 5G. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 78 (2017), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Radostin Stoyanov and Martin J. Kollingbaum. 2018. Efficient Live Migration of Linux Containers. In ISC Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Sharan Turlapati and Srivatsa Bhat. 2021. Linux kernel support for kernel thread starvation avoidance. Real-Time Micro-conference, Linux Plumbers Conference 2021 (2021). https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/11/contributions/1061/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Cheng Wang, Xusheng Chen, Weiwei Jia, Boxuan Li, Haoran Qiu, Shixiong Zhao, and Heming Cui. 2018. PLOVER: Fast, Multi-core Scalable Virtual Machine Fault-tolerance. In 15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 18). 483--489.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Sen Xu, Meng Hou, Yu Fu, Honglian Bian, and Cheng Gao. 2018. Improved Fast Centralized Retransmission Scheme for High-Layer Functional Split in 5G Network. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 960 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Xing Xu, Ioannis Broustis, Zihui Ge, Ramesh Govindan, Ajay Mahimkar, N. K. Shankaranarayanan, and Jia Wang. 2015. Magus: minimizing cellular service disruption during network upgrades. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, CoNEXT 2015, Heidelberg, Germany, December 1--4, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Francis Y. Yan, Hudson Ayers, Chenzhi Zhu, Sadjad Fouladi, James Hong, Keyi Zhang, Philip Levis, and Keith Winstein. 2020. Learning in situ: a randomized experiment in video streaming. In 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 20). USENIX Association, Santa Clara, CA, 495--511. https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi20/presentation/yanGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Qing Yang, Xiaoxiao Li, Hongyi Yao, Ji Fang, Kun Tan, Wenjun Hu, Jiansong Zhang, and Yongguang Zhang. 2013. BigStation: enabling scalable real-time signal processingin large MU-MIMO systems. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Hang Yin, Nanxi Li, Jing Guo, Jianchi Zhu, and Xiaoming She. 2022. NR Coverage Enhancements for PUSCH. IEEE Communications Magazine (2022).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Diyu Zhou and Yuval Tamir. 2021. HyCoR: Fault-Tolerant Replicated Containers Based on Checkpoint and Replay. CoRR abs/2101.09584 (2021). arXiv:2101.09584 https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09584Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Diyu Zhou and Yuval Tamir. 2022. RRC: Responsive Replicated Containers. In 2022 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 22). 85--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Resilient Baseband Processing in Virtualized RANs with Slingshot

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ACM SIGCOMM '23: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2023 Conference
          September 2023
          1217 pages
          ISBN:9798400702365
          DOI:10.1145/3603269

          Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author(s)

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 September 2023

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader