skip to main content
10.1145/3603166.3632538acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Electricity Trading with Anonymity

Published:04 April 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the integration of distributed energy systems (DESs) such as rooftop solar panels, and electric vehicles, peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading become popular among users. However, there are privacy concerns related to P2P energy trading systems such as identifying the electricity consumption pattern of the users. This might reveal the sensitive data of the users. This paper proposes an efficient and anonymous privacy-preserving access control protocol for such systems. The proposed protocol is capable of preserving the privacy of the users by providing access to the system without revealing their identities.

References

  1. Juhar Abdella and Khaled Shuaib. 2018. Peer to Peer Distributed Energy Trading in Smart Grids: A Survey. Energies 11, 6 (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Liaqat Ali, S. M. Muyeen, Hamed Bizhani, and Arindam Ghosh. 2021. A multi-objective optimization for planning of networked microgrid using a game theory for peer-to-peer energy trading scheme. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 15, 24 (2021), 3423--3434. arXiv:https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1049/gtd2.12308 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Henri Cohen, Gerhard Frey, Roberto Avanzi, Christophe Doche, Tanja Lange, Kim Nguyen, and Frederik Vercauteren. 2012. Handbook of Elliptic and Hyperelliptic Curve Cryptography, Second Edition (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tassos Dimitriou and Ghassan Karame. 2013. Privacy-Friendly Tasking and Trading of Energy in Smart Grids. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (Coimbra, Portugal) (SAC '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 652--659. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kamil Erdayandi, Amrit Paudel, Lucas C. Cordeiro, and Mustafa A. Mustafa. 2022. Privacy-Friendly Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading: A Game Theoretical Approach. CoRR abs/2201.01810 (2022). arXiv:2201.01810 https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01810Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alex Q. Huang, Mariesa L. Crow, Gerald Thomas Heydt, Jim P. Zheng, and Steiner J. Dale. 2011. The Future Renewable Electric Energy Delivery and Management (FREEDM) System: The Energy Internet. Proc. IEEE 99, 1 (2011), 133--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Georgios Kalogridis, Mahesh Sooriyabandara, Zhong Fan, and Mustafa A.Mustafa. 2014. Toward Unified Security and Privacy Protection for Smart Meter Networks. IEEE Systems Journal 8, 2 (2014), 641--654. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Vishnu Teja Kilari, Satyajayant Misra, and Guoliang Xue. 2016. Revocable anonymity based authentication for vehicle to grid (V2G) communications. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm). 351--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Oleksii Konashevych. 2016. Advantages and Current Issues of Blockchain Use in Microgrids. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:67197781Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Aron Laszka, Scott Eisele, Abhishek Dubey, Gabor Karsai, and Karla Kvaternik. 2018. TRANSAX: A Blockchain-Based Decentralized Forward-Trading Energy Exchanged for Transactive Microgrids. In 2018 IEEE 24th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS). 918--927. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Yikui Liu, Lei Wu, and Jie Li. 2019. Peer-to-peer (P2P) electricity trading in distribution systems of the future. The Electricity Journal 32, 4 (2019), 2 -- 6. Special Issue on Strategies for a sustainable, reliable and resilient grid. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Chao Long, Yue Zhou, and Jianzhong Wu. 2019. A game theoretic approach for peer-to-peer energy trading. Energy Procedia 159 (2019), 454--459. Renewable Energy Integration with Mini/Microgrid. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Xi Luo, Wence Shi, Yusen Jiang, Yanfeng Liu, and Jinwen Xia. 2022. Distributed peer-to-peer energy trading based on game theory in a community microgrid considering ownership complexity of distributed energy resources. Journal of Cleaner Production 351 (2022), 131573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sweta Malik, Maeve Duffy, Subhasis Thakur, Barry Hayes, and John Breslin. 2022. A priority-based approach for peer-to-peer energy trading using cooperative game theory in local energy community. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 137 (2022), 107865. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Mustafa A. Mustafa, Sara Cleemput, and Aysajan Abidin. 2016. A local electricity trading market: Security analysis. In 2016 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe). 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Harsha S. Gardiyawasam Pussewalage and Vladimir A. Oleshchuk. 2019. An Anonymous Delegatable Attribute-Based Credential Scheme for a Collaborative E-Health Environment. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 19, 3, Article 41 (sep 2019), 22 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Eman Mohammed Radi, Noureddine Lasla, Spiridon Bakiras, and Mohamed Mahmoud. 2019. Privacy-Preserving Electric Vehicle Charging for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Ecosystems. In ICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Barry N. Taylor and Ambler Thompson. March 2008. The International System of Units (SI). National Institute of Standards and Technology OR National Bureau of Standards; U.S. Department of Commerce: Gaithersburg, MD (March 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Albert Thumann and Eric A. Woodroof. 2009. Energy Project Financing: Resources and Strategies for Success. Fairmont Press, Lilburn, GA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Wayes Tushar, Tapan Kumar Saha, Chau Yuen, Thomas Morstyn, Malcolm D. McCulloch, H. Vincent Poor, and Kristin L. Wood. 2019. A motivational game-theoretic approach for peer-to-peer energy trading in the smart grid. Applied Energy 243 (2019), 10--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Shaomin Zhang, Xiangru Ying, and Baoyi Wang. 2023. A privacy protection scheme based on linkable ring signature for user payment of Peer-to-Peer uniform-price double auction transaction in the microgrid day-ahead market. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 147 (2023), 108806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yue Zhou, Jianzhong Wu, and Chao Long. 2018. Evaluation of peer-to-peer energy sharing mechanisms based on a multiagent simulation framework. Applied Energy 222 (2018), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Liehuang Zhu, Meng Li, Zijian Zhang, and Zhan Qin. 2020. ASAP: An Anonymous Smart-Parking and Payment Scheme in Vehicular Networks. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 17, 4 (2020), 703--715. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Electricity Trading with Anonymity

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UCC '23: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing
        December 2023
        502 pages
        ISBN:9798400702341
        DOI:10.1145/3603166

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 April 2024

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate38of125submissions,30%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader