skip to main content
10.1145/3597638.3614493acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Deploying VizLens: Characterizing User Needs, Preferences, and Challenges of Physical Interfaces Usage in the Wild

Published:22 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Blind or Visually Impaired (BVI) people often encounter flat, inaccessible interfaces. Current solutions lack cost-effectiveness, portability, and robustness in real-world settings. We introduce VizLens, a fully-automated, full-stack mobile application powered by computer vision algorithms. The system is deployed and publicly available through the Apple App Store (https://vizlens.org/). From May to August 2023, we had 665 users, who uploaded 1,320 interface images. We aim to use it to study usage patterns and possible challenges BVI users may encounter with flat interfaces through a large-scale study in real-world settings. With in-depth analysis of user data and activity logs, our study will provide insights into BVI users’ interface interests, preferred assistance modes, and potential challenges due to system limitations or users’ diverse abilities. Our goal is to enhance the understanding of how BVI users interact with inaccessible, flat interfaces, and inform future assistive technology design.

References

  1. Herbert Bay, Tinne Tuytelaars, and Luc Van Gool. 2006. SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2006, Aleš Leonardis, Horst Bischof, and Axel Pinz (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 404–417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Google Cloud. 2023. Google Cloud Vision. https://cloud.google.com/visionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aira Tech Corp. 2022. Aira. https://aira.io/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Be My Eyes. 2023. Be My Eyes. https://www.bemyeyes.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Giovanni Fusco, Ender Tekin, R.E. Ladner, and James Coughlan. 2014. Using Computer Vision to Access Appliance Displays. ASSETS / Association for Computing Machinery. ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661404Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Anhong Guo, Xiang ‘Anthony’ Chen, Haoran Qi, Samuel White, Suman Ghosh, Chieko Asakawa, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2016. VizLens: A Robust and Interactive Screen Reader for Interfaces in the Real World. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (UIST ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984518Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anhong Guo, Jeeeun Kim, Xiang ‘Anthony’ Chen, Tom Yeh, Scott E. Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2017. Facade: Auto-Generating Tactile Interfaces to Appliances. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5826–5838. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025845Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Anhong Guo, Junhan Kong, Michael Rivera, Frank F. Xu, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2019. StateLens: A Reverse Engineering Solution for Making Existing Dynamic Touchscreens Accessible. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Orleans, LA, USA) (UIST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347873Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Apple Machine Learning. 2023. Apple Machine Learning Vision. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/vision/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Liang, Yasha Iravantchi, Thomas Krolikowski, Ruijie Geng, Alanson P. Sample, and Anhong Guo. 2023. BrushLens: Hardware Interaction Proxies for Accessible Touchscreen Interface Actuation. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (San Francisco, CA, USA) (UIST ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606730Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tim Morris, Paul Blenkhorn, Luke Crossey, Quang Ngo, Martin Ross, David Werner, and Christina Wong. 2006. Clearspeech: A Display Reader for the Visually Handicapped. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 14, 4 (2006), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2006.881538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Vladimir Vezhnevets, Vassili Sazonov, and Alla Andreeva. 2004. A Survey on Pixel-Based Skin Color Detection Techniques. (03 2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Deploying VizLens: Characterizing User Needs, Preferences, and Challenges of Physical Interfaces Usage in the Wild

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASSETS '23: Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
        October 2023
        1163 pages
        ISBN:9798400702204
        DOI:10.1145/3597638

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 October 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        ASSETS '23 Paper Acceptance Rate55of182submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format