Amel Bennaceur
Avelie Stuart
Arosha Bandara
Daniel Gooch
Carlos Gavidia Calderon
Bashar Nuseibeh
ABSTRACT
Older adults at home frequently rely on ‘circles of support’ which range from relatives and neighbours, to the voluntary sector, social workers, paid carers, and medical professionals. Creating, maintaining, and coordinating these circles of support has often been done manually and in an ad hoc manner. We argue that a socio-technical system that assists in creating, maintaining, and coordinating circles of support is a key enabler of community healthcare for older adults.
In this paper we propose a framework called SERVICE (Socio-Technical Resilience for the Vulnerable) to help represent, reason about, and coordinate these circles of support and strengthen their capacity to deal with variations in care needs and environment. The objective is to make these circles resilient to changes in the needs and circumstances of older adults. Early results show that older adults appreciate the ability to represent and reflect on their circle of support.
- Pierre A. Akiki, Arosha K. Bandara, and Yijun Yu. 2014. Adaptive Model-Driven User Interface Development Systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 1 (2014), 9:1–9:33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2597999Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mohsen Amiribesheli, Asma Benmansour, and Abdelhamid Bouchachia. 2015. A review of smart homes in healthcare. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 6, 4 (2015), 495–517.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amel Bennaceur, Diane Hassett, Bashar Nuseibeh, and Andrea Zisman. 2023. Values@ Runtime: An Adaptive Framework for Operationalising Values. (2023).Google Scholar
- Mohamed Bennasar, Blaine A. Price, Avelie Stuart, Daniel Gooch, Ciaran McCormick, Vikram Mehta, Linda Clare, Amel Bennaceur, Jessica Cohen, Arosha K. Bandara, Mark Levine, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2019. Knowledge-Based Architecture for Recognising Activities of Older People. In Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference KES-2019, Budapest, Hungary, 4-6 September 2019(Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 159), Imre J. Rudas, János Csirik, Carlos Toro, János Botzheim, Robert J. Howlett, and Lakhmi C. Jain (Eds.). Elsevier, 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.214Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Caras. 2015. The Genie in the Machines. XRDS 22, 2 (Dec. 2015), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2845149Google ScholarDigital Library
- G Cockton. 2004. Value-centric HCI. In NordHCI.Google Scholar
- Fabiano Dalpiaz, Paolo Giorgini, and John Mylopoulos. 2013. Adaptive socio-technical systems: a requirements-based approach. Requir. Eng. 18, 1 (2013), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-011-0132-1Google ScholarDigital Library
- John M Darley and Bibb Latane. 1968. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.Journal of personality and social psychology 8, 4p1 (1968), 377.Google Scholar
- Karen Davis, Stephen C Schoenbaum, and Anne-Marie Audet. 2005. A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care. Journal of general internal medicine 20, 10 (2005), 953–957.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rachael A Eggins, Anne T O’Brien, Katherine J Reynolds, S Alexander Haslam, and Andrew S Crocker. 2008. Refocusing the focus group: AIRing as a basis for effective workplace planning. British Journal of Management 19, 3 (2008), 277–293.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Elsts, G. Oikonomou, X. Fafoutis, and R. Piechocki. 2017. Internet of Things for smart homes: Lessons learned from the SPHERE case study. In 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GIOTS.2017.8016226Google ScholarCross Ref
- M.A. Ferrario, W. Simm, J. Whittle, C. Frauenberger, G. Fitzpatrick, and P. Purgathofer. 2017. Values in Computing. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Explore, Innovate, Inspire. 660–667.Google Scholar
- Alois Ferscha. 2014. Attention, Please!IEEE Pervasive Computing 13, 1 (2014), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2014.3Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carlos Gavidia-Calderon, Amel Bennaceur, Anastasia Kordoni, Mark Levine, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2022. What Do You Want From Me? Adapting Systems to the Uncertainty of Human Preferences. In 44th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results ICSE (NIER) 2022, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, May 22-24, 2022, Liliana Pasquale and Christoph Treude (Eds.). IEEE/ACM, 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-NIER55298.2022.9793539Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diane Hassett, Amel Bennaceur, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2023. Feel It, Code It: Emotional Goal Modelling for Gender-Inclusive Design. (2023).Google Scholar
- C. Heath, C. Crivellaro, and L. Coles-Kemp. 2019. Relations are more than Bytes: Re-thinking the Benefits of Smart Services with People and Things. In CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.Google Scholar
- W Hussain, D Mougouei, and J Whittle. 2018. Integrating social values into software design patterns. In International Workshop on Software Fairness. ACM/IEEE.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kyeong-Ah Jeong and Robert W Proctor. 2011. Incorporation of Privacy and Usability for Remote/Home Healthcare Systems: Human Factors Considerations. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 55. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 620–624.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kyeong-Ah Jeong and Robert W Proctor. 2011. Inhabitant-centered interaction technology for future homes. Ergonomics in Design 19, 3 (2011), 9–14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jolanda Jetten, S Alexander Haslam, Tegan Cruwys, Katharine H Greenaway, Catherine Haslam, and Niklas K Steffens. 2017. Advancing the social identity approach to health and well-being: Progressing the social cure research agenda. European journal of social psychology 47, 7 (2017), 789–802.Google Scholar
- Timothy Patrick Kelly. 1999. Arguing safety: a systematic approach to managing safety cases. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of York.Google Scholar
- Thomas A. Limoncelli. 2015. Automation Should Be Like Iron Man, Not Ultron. ACM Queue 13, 8 (2015), 50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838344.2841313Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sonali R Mishra, Shefali Haldar, Ari H Pollack, Logan Kendall, Andrew D Miller, Maher Khelifi, and Wanda Pratt. 2016. Not Just a Receiver: Understanding Patient Behavior in the Hospital Environment. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3103–3114.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Inbal Nahum-Shani, Shawna N Smith, Bonnie J Spring, Linda M Collins, Katie Witkiewitz, Ambuj Tewari, and Susan A Murphy. 2018. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 52, 6 (2018), 446–462.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Max Neill and Helen Sanderson. 2012. Circles of support and personalisation. http://www.imagineactandsucceed.co.uk/Agenda/Circle-of-Support-and-Personalisation.aspx [Online- visited 06 June 2018].Google Scholar
- Richard Owen, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and public policy 39, 6 (2012), 751–760.Google Scholar
- H Perera, R Hoda, R Shams, A Nurwidyantoro, M Shahin, W Hussain, and J Whittle. 2021. The impact of considering human values during requirements engineering activities. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2021).Google Scholar
- Anne Marie Piper, Raymundo Cornejo, Lisa Hurwitz, and Caitlin Unumb. 2016. Technological caregiving: supporting online activity for adults with cognitive impairments. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5311–5323.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aways Rashid, John Weckert, and R. Lucas. 2009. Software Engineering Ethics in A Digital World. IEEE Computer (2009), 1.Google Scholar
- A Rashid, J Weckert, and R Lucas. 2019. Software engineering ethics in a digital world. IEEE Computer (2019).Google Scholar
- Yvonne Rogers. 2006. Moving on from Weiser’s Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences. In Proc. of the 8th Intl. Conf. UbiComp. 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853565_24Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Russo and Paolo Ciancarini. 2016. A Proposal for an Antifragile Software Manifesto. Procedia Computer Science 83 (2016), 982–987.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mojtaba Shahin, Waqar Hussain, Arif Nurwidyantoro, Harsha Perera, Rifat Ara Shams, John C. Grundy, and Jon Whittle. 2021. Operationalizing Human Values in Software Engineering: A Survey. ArXiv abs/2108.05624 (2021).Google Scholar
- Avelie Stuart, Arosha K Bandara, and Mark Levine. 2019. The psychology of privacy in the digital age. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 13, 11 (2019), e12507.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Avelie Stuart, Dmitri Katz, Clifford Stevenson, Daniel Gooch, Lydia Harkin, Mohamed Bennasar, Lisa Sanderson, Jacki Liddle, Amel Bennaceur, Mark Levine, 2022. Loneliness in older people and COVID-19: applying the social identity approach to digital intervention design. Computers in Human Behavior Reports (2022), 100179.Google Scholar
- Avelie Stuart, Dmitri Katz, Clifford Stevenson, Daniel Gooch, Lydia Harkin, Mohamed Bennasar, Lisa Sanderson, Jacki Liddle, Amel Bennaceur, Mark Levine, 2022. Loneliness in older people and COVID-19: applying the social identity approach to digital intervention design. Computers in Human Behavior Reports (2022), 100179.Google Scholar
- Avelie Stuart, Ronnie Jieru Yan, Lydia Jo Harkin, Dmitri Katz, Clifford Stevenson, Vikram Mehta, Emilie Giles, Catherine Talbot, Daniel Gooch, Mohamed Bennasar, 2023. Digital Intervention in Loneliness in Older Adults: Qualitative Analysis of User Studies. JMIR Formative Research 7, 1 (2023), e42172.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jon Whittle. 2019. Is Your Software Valueless?IEEE Software (2019).Google Scholar
- Emily Winter, Stephen Forshaw, Lucy Hunt, and Maria Angela Ferrario. 2019. Advancing the study of human values in software engineering. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 12th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE). IEEE, 19–26.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Socio-Technical Resilience for Community Healthcare
Recommendations
Exploring Experiences of Self-Directed Care Budgets: Design Implications for Socio-Technical Interventions
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe role of HCI in informal caregivers’ lives has been a focus of research for some time. Yet to gain significance in HCI, are the implications of healthcare systems’ transformation into a personalised care paradigm, where citizens gain choice and ...
Alone and Together: Resilience in a Fluid Socio-Technical-Natural System
CSCWDisruption to routines is an increasingly common part of everyday life. With the roots of some disruptions in the interconnectedness of the world and environmental and socio-political instability, there is good reason to believe that conditions that ...
Categorization of Factors Influencing Community Health Workers from a Socio-Technical Systems Perspective
Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication TechnologyAbstractIn low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), community health workers (CHWs) are often seen as a connecting bridge between two dynamic and overlapping systems- the community and formal health systems. Although the importance of CHWs is acknowledged,...
Comments