skip to main content
10.1145/3589335.3652003acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Free Access

Digital Democracy at Crossroads: A Meta-Analysis of Web and AI Influence on Global Elections

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

2024 will be the largest election year in history involving over 50 countries and approximately 4.2 billion people. Since 1996, the Web has been instrumental in political campaigns, enhancing public engagement and creating new communication avenues for elections. Nevertheless, the proliferation of generative AI technologies has made false information dissemination simpler and quicker, posing a substantial threat to election integrity and democratic processes. The 2024 global elections underscore the need to comprehend and tackle the impact of such technologies on democracy. In this paper, we undertake a detailed meta-analysis, scrutinizing 44 papers published in The Web Conference, detailing the influence of the Web on elections. Our research reveals key historical trends on how the Web has impacted elections: first, social media has revolutionized election strategies through direct voter-candidate interactions. Second, big data and algorithm-driven campaigns are commonplace. Third, AI advancements have exacerbated the spread of fake news, risking election fairness. Predominantly from studies published since 2018 among 44 papers, we underscore the necessity for advanced detection tools, policy formulation, and responsible AI use to maintain electoral integrity. This analysis offers an insight into the Web and AI's impact on elections, presenting pointers for addressing challenges and leveraging opportunities in the 2024 and future elections.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

hw8970.mov

Supplemental video

mov

55.2 MB

References

  1. Alvari, H., Shaabani, E., Sarkar, S., Beigi, G., and Shakarian, P. Less is more: Semi-supervised causal inference for detecting pathogenic users in social media. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference (2019), pp. 154--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Badawy, A., Lerman, K., and Ferrara, E. Who falls for online political manipu-lation? In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference (2019), pp. 162--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barbaro, F., and Skumanich, A. Addressing socially destructive disinformation on the web with advanced ai tools: Russia as a case study. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023), pp. 204--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bedard, M., and Schoenthaler, C. Satire or fake news: Social media consumers' socio-demographics decide. In Companion proceedings of the the web conference 2018 (2018), pp. 613--619.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bhatt, S., Joglekar, S., Bano, S., and Sastry, N. Illuminating an ecosystem of partisan websites. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 (2018), pp. 545--554.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Budak, C. What happened? the spread of fake news publisher content during the 2016 us presidential election. In The World Wide Web Conference (2019), pp. 139--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Capozzi, A., De Francisci Morales, G., Mejova, Y., Monti, C., and Panisson, A. The thin ideology of populist advertising on facebook during the 2019 eu elections. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023), pp. 2852--2862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Castelo, S., Almeida, T., Elghafari, A., Santos, A., Pham, K., Nakamura, E., and Freire, J. A topic-agnostic approach for identifying fake news pages. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web conference (2019), pp. 975--980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Coelho, B., Lauinger, T., Edelson, L., Goldstein, I., and McCoy, D. Propaganda política pagada: Exploring us political facebook ads en español. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023), pp. 2742--2753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Contractor, D., and Faruqie, T. A. Understanding election candidate approval ratings using social media data. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (2013), pp. 189--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Davis, R. The web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Deb, A., Luceri, L., Badaway, A., and Ferrara, E. Perils and challenges of social media and election manipulation analysis: The 2018 us midterms. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference (2019), pp. 237--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fard, A. E., and Lingeswaran, S. Misinformation battle revisited: Counter strategies from clinics to artificial intelligence. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020 (2020), pp. 510--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Fernandez, M., and Alani, H. Online misinformation: Challenges and future directions. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 (2018), pp. 595--602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., and Mathioudakis, M. Political discourse on social media: Echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference (2018), pp. 913--922.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Haider, S., Luceri, L., Deb, A., Badawy, A., Peng, N., and Ferrara, E. Detecting social media manipulation in low-resource languages. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023), pp. 1358--1364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hassan, T. Trust and trustworthiness in social recommender systems. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference (2019), pp. 529--532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Heath, R. Welcome to the generative ai election era, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu, D., Jiang, S., E. Robertson, R., and Wilson, C. Auditing the partisanship of google search snippets. In The World Wide Web Conference (2019), pp. 693--704.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Huyen, L., Raven, M., Brian, E., Andrew, H., Timothy, H., Zubair, S., Ling, L., and Ryen, W. Measuring political personalization of google news search. In Proceedings of The Web Conference (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Iqbal, H., Khan, U. M., Khan, H. A., and Shahzad, M. Left or right: A peek into the political biases in email spam filtering algorithms during us election 2020. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 (2022), pp. 2491--2500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jaiswal, S., and Mukherjee, A. A history of diversity in the web (conference). In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023), pp. 625--632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jijkoun, V., Marx, M., de Rijke, M., and van Waveren, F. Electoral search using the verkiezingskijker: an experience report. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web (2007), pp. 1155--1156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Liu, P., Shivaram, K., Culotta, A., Shapiro, M. A., and Bilgic, M. The inter-action between political typology and filter bubbles in news recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (2021), pp. 3791--3801.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Luceri, L., Deb, A., Badawy, A., and Ferrara, E. Red bots do it better: Compar-ative analysis of social bot partisan behavior. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference (2019), pp. 1007--1012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. Otala, J., Kurtic, G., Grasso, I., Liu, Y., Matthews, J., and Madraki, G. Political polarization and platform migration: A study of parler and twitter usage by united states of america congress members. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (2021), pp. 224--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Machado, C., Kira, B., Narayanan, V., Kollanyi, B., and Howard, P. A study of misinformation in whatsapp groups with a focus on the brazilian presidential elections. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web conference (2019), pp. 1013--1019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Morstatter, F., Shao, Y., Galstyan, A., and Karunasekera, S. From alt-right to alt-rechts: Twitter analysis of the 2017 german federal election. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 (2018), pp. 621--628.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Papakyriakopoulos, O., and Goodman, E. The impact of twitter labels on misinformation spread and user engagement: Lessons from trump's election tweets. In Proceedings of the ACM web conference 2022 (2022), pp. 2541--2551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Pennekamp, J., Henze, M., Hohlfeld, O., and Panchenko, A. Hi doppelgänger: Towards detecting manipulation in news comments. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference (2019), pp. 197--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Prabhakaran, V., John, A., and Seligmann, D. D. Power dynamics in spoken interactions: a case study on 2012 republican primary debates. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (2013), pp. 99--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. R. Walker, C., Terp, S.-J., C. Breuer, P., and L. Crooks, PhD, C. Misinfosec. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference (2019), pp. 1026--1032.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Robertson, R. E., Lazer, D., and Wilson, C. Auditing the personalization and composition of politically-related search engine results pages. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference (2018), pp. 955--965.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Saha, P., Mathew, B., Garimella, K., and Mukherjee, A. ?short is the road that leads from fear to hate": Fear speech in indian whatsapp groups. In Proceedings of the Web conference 2021 (2021), pp. 1110--1121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Schein, A., Vafa, K., Sridhar, D., Veitch, V., Quinn, J., Moffet, J., Blei, D. M., and Green, D. P. Assessing the effects of friend-to-friend texting onturnout in the 2018 us midterm elections. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (2021), pp. 2025--2036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Silva, M., Santos de Oliveira, L., Andreou, A., Vaz de Melo, P. O., Goga, O., and Benevenuto, F. Facebook ads monitor: An independent auditing system for political ads on facebook. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020 (2020), pp. 224--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Singh, M., Iyengar, S., Saxena, A., and Kaur, R. A bi-level assessment of twitter data for election prediction: Delhi assembly elections 2020. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022 (2022), pp. 930--935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Sosnovik, V., and Goga, O. Understanding the complexity of detecting political ads. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (2021), pp. 2002--2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sosnovik, V., Kessi, R., Coavoux, M., and Goga, O. On detecting policy-related political ads: An exploratory analysis of meta ads in 2022 french election. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023), pp. 4104--4114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Spangher, A., Ranade, G., Nushi, B., Fourney, A., and Horvitz, E. Characterizing search-engine traffic to internet research agency web properties. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020 (2020), pp. 2253--2263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Tian, L., Zhang, X., and Lau, J. H. Metatroll: Few-shot detection of state-sponsored trolls with transformer adapters. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023), pp. 1743--1753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Turkel, E. Regulating online political advertising. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 (2022), pp. 3584--3593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Xia, E., Yue, H., and Liu, H. Tweet sentiment analysis of the 2020 us presidential election. In Companion proceedings of the web conference 2021 (2021), pp. 367--371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Yang, K.-C., Hui, P.-M., and Menczer, F. Bot electioneering volume: Visualizing social bot activity during elections. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference (2019), pp. 214--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Yeung, C., Iqbal, U., O'Neil, Y. T., Kohno, T., and Roesner, F. Online advertising in ukraine and russia during the 2022 russian invasion. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023), pp. 2787--2796.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Younus, A., Qureshi, M. A., Saeed, M., Touheed, N., O'Riordan, C., and Pasi, G. Election trolling: analyzing sentiment in tweets during pakistan elections 2013. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (2014), pp. 411--412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Zannettou, S., Caulfield, T., De Cristofaro, E., Sirivianos, M., Stringhini, G., and Blackburn, J. Disinformation warfare: Understanding state-sponsored trolls on twitter and their influence on the web. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference (2019), pp. 218--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Digital Democracy at Crossroads: A Meta-Analysis of Web and AI Influence on Global Elections

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WWW '24: Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024
      May 2024
      1928 pages
      ISBN:9798400701726
      DOI:10.1145/3589335

      Copyright © 2024 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)42

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader