skip to main content
10.1145/3589334.3645497acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Filter Bubble or Homogenization? Disentangling the Long-Term Effects of Recommendations on User Consumption Patterns

Published:13 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommendation algorithms play a pivotal role in shaping our media choices, which makes it crucial to comprehend their long-term impact on user behavior. These algorithms are often linked to two critical outcomes: homogenization, wherein users consume similar content despite disparate underlying preferences, and the filter bubble effect, wherein individuals with differing preferences only consume content aligned with their preferences (without much overlap with other users). Prior research assumes a trade-off between homogenization and filter bubble effects and then shows that personalized recommendations mitigate filter bubbles by fostering homogenization. However, because of this assumption of a tradeoff between these two effects, prior work cannot develop a more nuanced view of how recommendation systems may independently impact homogenization and filter bubble effects. We develop a more refined definition of homogenization and the filter bubble effect by decomposing them into two key metrics: how different the average consumption is between users (inter-user diversity) and how varied an individual's consumption is (intra-user diversity). We then use a novel agent-based simulation framework that enables a holistic view of the impact of recommendation systems on homogenization and filter bubble effects. Our simulations show that traditional recommendation algorithms (based on past behavior) mainly reduce filter bubbles by affecting inter-user diversity without significantly impacting intra-user diversity. Building on these findings, we introduce two new recommendation algorithms that take a more nuanced approach by accounting for both types of diversity.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

rfp1131.mp4

Supplemental video

mp4

7.7 MB

References

  1. Guy Aridor, Duarte Goncalves, and Shan Sikdar. 2020. Deconstructing the Filter Bubble: User Decision-Making and Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Virtual Event, Brazil) (RecSys '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 82--91. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3383313.3412246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A. Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239 (2015), 1130--1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160 arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaa1160Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Bruns. 2019. Filter bubble. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Pablo Castells, Neil Hurley, and Saúl Vargas. 2022. Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems. Springer US, New York, NY, 603--646. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978--1-0716--2197--4_16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Allison J. B. Chaney, Brandon M. Stewart, and Barbara E. Engelhardt. 2018. How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utility. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (RecSys '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 224--232. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3240323.3240370Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Seth Flaxman, Sharad Goel, and Justin M. Rao. 2016. Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly 80, S1 (03 2016), 298--320. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/poq/nfw006 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/poq/articlepdf/ 80/S1/298/17120810/nfw006.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Daniel Fleder and Kartik Hosanagar. 2009. Blockbuster Culture's Next Rise or Fall: The Impact of Recommender Systems on Sales Diversity. , 697--712 pages. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Daniel Geschke, Jan Lorenz, and Peter Holtz. 2019. The triple-filter bubble: Using agent-based modelling to test a meta-theoretical framework for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers. British Journal of Social Psychology 58, 1 (2019), 129--149. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12286 arXiv:https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjso.12286Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kartik Hosanagar, Daniel Fleder, Dokyun Lee, and Andreas Buja. 2013. Will the Global Village Fracture Into Tribes? Recommender Systems and Their Effects on Consumer Fragmentation. Management Science 60(4) (2013), 805--823.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jonas Kaiser and Adrian Rauchfleisch. 2020. Birds of a Feather Get Recommended Together: Algorithmic Homophily in YouTube's Channel Recommendations in the United States and Germany. Social Media Society 6, 4 (2020), 2056305120969914. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120969914 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120969914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Matevz Kunaver and Tomaz Pozrl. 2017. Diversity in recommender systems -- A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems 123 (2017), 154--162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. knosys.2017.02.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anja Lambrecht and Catherine Tucker. 2016. Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study into Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads. SSRN Electronic Journal (01 2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2852260Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Masoud Mansoury, Himan Abdollahpouri, Mykola Pechenizkiy, Bamshad Mobasher, and Robin Burke. 2020. Feedback Loop and Bias Amplification in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (Virtual Event, Ireland) (CIKM '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2145--2148. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3412152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kari Karppinen Natali Helberger and Lucia D'Acunto. 2018. Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems. Information, Communication & Society 21, 2 (2018), 191--207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271900 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271900Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tien T. Nguyen, Pik-Mai Hui, F. Maxwell Harper, Loren Terveen, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2014. Exploring the Filter Bubble: The Effect of Using Recommender Systems on Content Diversity. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (Seoul, Korea) (WWW '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 677--686. https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Derek O'Callaghan, Derek Greene, Maura Conway, Joe Carthy, and Pádraig Cunningham. 2015. Down the (White) Rabbit Hole: The Extreme Right and Online Recommender Systems. Social Science Computer Review 33, 4 (2015), 459--478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314555329 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314555329Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Eli Pariser. 2011. The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Matthew J. Salganik, Peter Sheridan Dodds, and Duncan J. Watts. 2006. Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market. Science 311, 5762 (2006), 854--856. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121066 arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1121066Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jessica Su, Aneesh Sharma, and Sharad Goel. 2016. The Effect of Recommendations on Network Structure. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (WWW '16). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 1157--1167. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Filter Bubble or Homogenization? Disentangling the Long-Term Effects of Recommendations on User Consumption Patterns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WWW '24: Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024
      May 2024
      4826 pages
      ISBN:9798400701719
      DOI:10.1145/3589334

      Copyright © 2024 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)79
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)76

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader