skip to main content
10.1145/3589334.3645490acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Content Moderation and the Formation of Online Communities: A Theoretical Framework

Published:13 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

We study the impact of content moderation policies in online communities. In our theoretical model, a platform chooses a content moderation policy and individuals choose whether or not to participate in the community according to the fraction of user content that aligns with their preferences. The effects of content moderation, at first blush, might seem obvious: platform speech is restricted. However, when user participation decisions are taken into account, its effects can be more subtle --- and counter-intuitive. For example, our model can straightforwardly demonstrate how moderation policies mayincrease participation and/ordiversify content available on the platform. In our analysis, we explore a rich set of interconnected phenomena related to content moderation in online communities. We first characterize the effectiveness of a natural class of moderation policies for creating and sustaining communities. Building on this, we explore how resource-limited or ideological platforms might set policies, how communities are affected by differing levels of personalization, and competition between platforms. Our model provides a vocabulary and mathematically tractable framework for analyzing platform decisions about content moderation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

rfp1095.mov

Supplemental video

mov

25.8 MB

References

  1. Shiza Ali, Mohammad Hammas Saeed, Esraa Aldreabi, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Savvas Zannettou, and Gianluca Stringhini. 2021. Understanding the effect of deplatforming on social networks. In 13th ACMWeb Science Conference 2021. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 187--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cynthia Dwork, Chris Hays, Jon Kleinberg, and Manish Raghavan. 2023. Content Moderation and the Formation of Online Communities: A Theoretical Framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10573 (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anna Fang, Wenjie Yang, and Haiyi Zhu. 2023. Shaping Online Dialogue: Examining How Community Rules Affect Discussion Structures on Reddit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01257 (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tarleton Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll J Glynn, Ronald E Ostman, and Daniel G McDonald. 1995. Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent. Guilford Press, Guilford, Chapter Opinions, perception and social reality.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Shagun Jhaver, Savvas Zannettou, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca Stringhini, Emiliano De Cristofaro, and Robert West. 2021. Do platform migrations compromise content moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/Incels. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kate Klonick. 2017. The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harv. L. Rev. 131 (2017), 1598.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yi Liu, Pinar Yildirim, and Z. John Zhang. 2022. Implications of Revenue Models and Technology for Content Moderation Strategies. Marketing Science 41, 4 (2022), 831--847. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1361 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1361Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Leonardo Madio and Martin Quinn. 2023. Content moderation and advertising in social media platforms. Available at SSRN 3551103 (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mohamed Mostagir and James Siderius. 2022. Naive and Bayesian Learning with Misinformation Policies. Technical Report.Working paper, University of Michigan and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mohamed Mostagir and James Siderius. 2023. When Should Platforms Break Echo Chambers? (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Karl Popper. 1963. The open society and its enemies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. David G Post. 1995. Anarchy State and the Internet. Journal of Online Law, Article 3 (1995), 11 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Adrian Rauchfleisch and Jonas Kaiser. 2021. Deplatforming the far-right: An analysis of YouTube and BitChute. Available at SSRN (2021), 28 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomas C. Schelling. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1, 2 (1971), 143--186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X. 1971.9989794 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Craig Silverman, Craig Timberg, Jeff Kao, and Jeremy B. Merrill. 2022. Facebook Hosted Surge of Misinformation and Insurrection Threats in Months Leading Up to Jan. 6 Attack, Records Show. ProPublica (2022). https: //www.propublica.org/article/facebook-hosted-surge-of-misinformation-andinsurrection- threats-in-months-leading-up-to-jan-6-attack-records-showGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. U.S. Supreme Court. 1927. Whitney v. California (247 U.S. 357) (L. Brandeis, concurring).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Isaac Waller and Ashton Anderson. 2021. Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms. Nature 600, 7888 (Dec. 2021), 264--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Content Moderation and the Formation of Online Communities: A Theoretical Framework

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WWW '24: Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024
          May 2024
          4826 pages
          ISBN:9798400701719
          DOI:10.1145/3589334

          Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author

          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 May 2024

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader