skip to main content
10.1145/3589334.3645459acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access
Artifacts Available / v1.1

Investigations of Top-Level Domain Name Collisions in Blockchain Naming Services

Published:13 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Traditionally, top-level domains (TLDs) are managed by the Internet corporation for assigned names and numbers (ICANN), and the domain names under them are managed by registrars. Against such a centralized management, a blockchain naming service (BNS) has been proposed to manage TLDs on blockchains without authority intervention. BNS users can register TLD strings as non-fungible tokens and manage the TLD root zone. However, such a decentralized management results in the introduction of a new security issue, BNS TLD name collision, wherein the same TLD is registered in several different BNSs. In this study, we investigated BNS TLD name collisions by analyzing TLDs registered on two BNSs: Handshake and Decentraweb. Specifically, we collected TLDs registered in Handshake and Decentraweb and the associated data, and analyzed the data registration status of BNS TLDs and BNS TLD name collisions. The analysis of 11,595,406 Handshake and 11,889 Decentraweb TLDs revealed 6,973 BNS TLD name collisions. In particular, lastname TLDs, which are intended for use as person names, yielded a large number of registered domain names. In addition, the analysis identified 10 name collisions between the BNS and operational ICANN TLDs. Further, the ICANN TLD candidates under review also had name collisions against the BNS TLDs. Consequently, based on the characteristics of these name collisions and discussions in BNS communities, we considered countermeasures against BNS TLD name collisions. For the further development of BNSs, we believe that it is essential to discuss with the existing Internet communities and coexist with the existing Internet.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

rfp0823.mov

Supplemental video

mov

66.8 MB

References

  1. 2021. Handling ICANN Strings in Hard Fork. https://github.com/handshake-org/hsd/issues/649.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2023. Butterfly Protocol. https://www.butterflyprotocol.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2023. CoinGecko. https://www.coingecko.com/ja.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2023. D&B Hoovers. https://www.dnb.com/products/marketing-sales/dnb-hoovers.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2023. Decentraweb. https://dns.decentraweb.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2023. Decentraweb JavaScript SDK. https://github.com/decentraweb/decentrawebjs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 2023. Decentraweb JSON Reserve List. https://github.com/decentraweb/reserve-list.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 2023. EmerDNS. https://emercoin.com/emerdns.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 2023. Ethereum Name Service. https://ens.domains/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 2023. Handshake. https://handshake.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 2023. Handshake Developer Documentation. https://hsd-dev.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 2023. Handshake DNS: Adding DNS records to domains in Namebase. https://learn.namebase.io/starting-from-zero/how-to-add-dns-records.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 2023. handshake-names. https://github.com/handshake-org/hs-names.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 2023. Handshake WhitePaper. https://handshake.org/files/handshake.txt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 2023. How to Claim a Name. https://hsd-dev.org/guides/claims.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 2023. Namecoin. https://www.namecoin.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 2023. NFTPort. https://www.nftport.xyz/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 2023. OpenNIC Project. https://www.opennic.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 2023. Superlink. https://superlink.me/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 2023. Tranco list. https://tranco-list.eu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 2023. Unstoppable Domains. https://unstoppabledomains.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Allemann. 2022. Update: Unstoppable Domains sues over Handshake .wallet domain. https://domainnamewire.com/2022/07/20/update-unstoppable-domains-sues-over-handshake-wallet-domain/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Fran Casino, Nikolaos Lykousas, Vasilios Katos, and Constantinos Patsakis. 2021. Unearthing malicious campaigns and actors from the blockchain DNS ecosystem. Computer Communications 179 (2021), 217--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Qi Alfred Chen, Eric Osterweil, Matthew Thomas, and Z. Morley Mao. 2016. MitM Attack by Name Collision: Cause Analysis and Vulnerability Assessment in the New gTLD Era. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Qi Alfred Chen, Matthew Thomas, Eric Osterweil, Yulong Cao, Jie You, and Z. Morley Mao. 2017. Client-side Name collision vulnerability in the New gTLD Era: A systematic study. In ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. IANA. 2023. tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt. http://data.iana.org/TLD/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. ICANN. 2001. Keeping the Internet a Reliable Global Public Resource: Response to New.net Policy Paper. https://archive.icann.org/en/icp/icp-3-background/response-to-new.net-09jul01.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. ICANN. 2013. Guide to Name Collision Identification and Mitigation for IT Professionals. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/f iles/name-collision-mitigation-05dec13-en.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. ICANN. 2013. Name Collision Resources & Information. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/name-collision-2013--12-06-en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. ICANN. 2014. Guide to Name Collision Identification and Mitigation for IT Professionals. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/f iles/name-collision-mitigation-01aug14-en.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. ICANN. 2014. Name Collision Occurence Management Framework. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-framework-30jul14-en.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. ICANN. 2023. About the New gTLD Program. https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/program.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. ICANN. 2023. New gTLD Current Application Status. https://gtldresult.icann.org/applicationstatus/viewstatus.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Interisle Consulting Group, LLC. 2013. Name Collision in the DNS. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-02aug13-en.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. JPCERT/CC. 2023. JPCERT Coordination Center. https://www.jpcert.or.jp/english/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. JPNIC. 2015. Appendix1: IP address and domain name. https://www.nic.ad.jp/timeline/en/20th/appendix1.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Harry Kalodner, Miles Carlsten, Paul Ellenbogen, Joseph Bonneau, and Arvind Narayanan. 2015. An empirical study of Namecoin and lessons for decentralized namespace design. In Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (WEIS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Audrey Randall, Wes Hardaker, Geoffrey M. Voelker, Stefan Savage, and Aaron Schulman. 2022. The Challenges of Blockchain-Based Naming Systems for Malware Defenders. In APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research (eCrime).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Tripti Sinha. 2023. ICANN Board Accepts Next Round Implementation Plan from ICANN Org. https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-board-accepts-next-round-implementation-plan-from-icann-org-31-07--2023-en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Unstoppable Domains. 2022. Why we're no longer offering .coin. https://unstoppabledomains.com/blog/categories/announcements/article/coin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Pengcheng Xia, Haoyu Wang, Zhou Yu, Xinyu Liu, Xiapu Luo, Guoai Xu, and Gareth Tyson. 2022. Challenges in Decentralized Name Management: The Case of ENS. In ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (IMC).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Zonefiles. 2023. All active domain lists. https://zonefiles.io/all-registered-domains/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Investigations of Top-Level Domain Name Collisions in Blockchain Naming Services

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WWW '24: Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024
        May 2024
        4826 pages
        ISBN:9798400701719
        DOI:10.1145/3589334

        Copyright © 2024 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 May 2024

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)40

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader