skip to main content
10.1145/3589334.3645424acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Mining Exploratory Queries for Conversational Search

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Users' queries are usually vague, and their search intents tend to be ambiguous, thereby needing search clarification to clarify users' current intent by asking a clarifying question and providing several clickable sub-intent items as clarification options. However, in addition to drilling down the current query, users may also have exploratory needs that diverge from their current intent. For example, a user searching for the query "Cartier women watches'' may also potentially want to explore some parallel information by issuing queries such as "Rolex women watches'' or "Cartier women bracelets'', named exploratory queries in this paper. These exploratory needs are common during the search process yet cannot be satisfied by current search clarification approaches which typically stick to the sub-intents of the query. This paper focuses on mining exploratory queries as additional options to meet users' exploratory needs in conversational search systems. Specifically, we first design a rule-based model that generates exploratory queries based on the current query's top retrieved documents. Then, we propose using the data generated by the rule-based model to train a neural generation model through multi-task learning for further generalization. Finally, we borrow the in-context learning ability of the large language model to generate exploratory queries based on prompt engineering. We constructed an evaluation dataset based on human annotations and conduct an extensive set of experiments. The results show that our proposed methods generate higher-quality exploratory queries compared with several baselines.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

rfp0636.mp4

Supplemental video

mp4

8.5 MB

References

  1. Wasi Uddin Ahmad and Kai-Wei Chang. 2018. Multi-task learning for document ranking and query suggestion. In Sixth International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfred V Aho and Margaret J Corasick. 1975. Efficient string matching: an aid to bibliographic search. Commun. ACM, Vol. 18, 6 (1975), 333--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mohammad Aliannejadi, Hamed Zamani, Fabio Crestani, and W Bruce Croft. 2019. Asking clarifying questions in open-domain information-seeking conversations. In Proceedings of the 42nd international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval. 475--484.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Paolo Boldi, Francesco Bonchi, Carlos Castillo, and Sebastiano Vigna. 2009. From" dango" to" japanese cakes": Query reformulation models and patterns. In 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Vol. 1. IEEE, 183--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fei Cai, Maarten De Rijke, et al. 2016. A survey of query auto completion in information retrieval. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, Vol. 10, 4 (2016), 273--363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ruey-Cheng Chen and Chia-Jung Lee. 2020. Incorporating behavioral hypotheses for query generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02667 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mostafa Dehghani, Sascha Rothe, Enrique Alfonseca, and Pascal Fleury. 2017. Learning to attend, copy, and generate for session-based query suggestion. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 1747--1756.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Zhicheng Dou, Sha Hu, Yulong Luo, Ruihua Song, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2011. Finding dimensions for queries. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. 1311--1320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Zhicheng Dou, Zhengbao Jiang, Sha Hu, Ji-Rong Wen, and Ruihua Song. 2015. Automatically mining facets for queries from their search results. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, Vol. 28, 2 (2015), 385--397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng, Gu Xu, and Huawei Shen. 2010. A structured approach to query recommendation with social annotation data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. 619--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Helia Hashemi, Hamed Zamani, and W Bruce Croft. 2021. Learning multiple intent representations for search queries. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 669--679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Helia Hashemi, Hamed Zamani, and W Bruce Croft. 2022. Stochastic Optimization of Text Set Generation for Learning Multiple Query Intent Representations. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 4003--4008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jyun-Yu Jiang and Wei Wang. 2018. RIN: Reformulation inference network for context-aware query suggestion. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 197--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Zhengbao Jiang, Zhicheng Dou, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2016. Generating query facets using knowledge bases. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, Vol. 29, 2 (2016), 315--329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Makoto P Kato, Tetsuya Sakai, and Katsumi Tanaka. 2012. Structured query suggestion for specialization and parallel movement: effect on search behaviors. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. 389--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Weize Kong and James Allan. 2013. Extracting query facets from search results. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 93--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Weize Kong and James Allan. 2014. Extending faceted search to the general web. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 839--848.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Alex Ksikes. 2014. Towards exploratory faceted search systems. Ph.,D. Dissertation. University of Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Ves Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2019. Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13461 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruirui Li, Liangda Li, Xian Wu, Yunhong Zhou, and Wei Wang. 2019. Click feedback-aware query recommendation using adversarial examples. In The World Wide Web Conference. 2978--2984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Matteo Lissandrini, Davide Mottin, Themis Palpanas, and Yannis Velegrakis. 2020. Graph-query suggestions for knowledge graph exploration. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 2549--2555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Chao Liu, Xuanlin Bao, Hongyu Zhang, Neng Zhang, Haibo Hu, Xiaohong Zhang, and Meng Yan. 2023 a. Improving ChatGPT Prompt for Code Generation. arxiv: 2305.08360 [cs.SE]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiqun Liu. 2022. Toward Cranfield-Inspired Reusability Assessment in Interactive Information Retrieval Evaluation. Inf. Process. Manage. , Vol. 59, 5 (sep 2022), bibinfonumpages16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Pengfei Liu, Weizhe Yuan, Jinlan Fu, Zhengbao Jiang, Hiroaki Hayashi, and Graham Neubig. 2023 b. Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. Comput. Surveys, Vol. 55, 9 (2023), 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Chao Ma and Bin Zhang. 2018. A new query recommendation method supporting exploratory search based on search goal shift graphs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 30, 11 (2018), 2024--2036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Christopher D Manning, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Rose Finkel, Steven Bethard, and David McClosky. 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In Proceedings of 52nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: system demonstrations. 55--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Agnès Mustar, Sylvain Lamprier, and Benjamin Piwowarski. 2020. Using BERT and BART for query suggestion. In Joint Conference of the Information Retrieval Communities in Europe, Vol. 2621. CEUR-WS. org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Filip Radlinski and Nick Craswell. 2017. A theoretical framework for conversational search. In Proceedings of the 2017 conference on conference human information interaction and retrieval. 117--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Chris Samarinas, Arkin Dharawat, and Hamed Zamani. 2022. Revisiting Open Domain Query Facet Extraction and Generation. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval. 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Ivan Sekulić, Mohammad Aliannejadi, and Fabio Crestani. 2021. Towards facet-driven generation of clarifying questions for conversational search. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval. 167--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Alessandro Sordoni, Yoshua Bengio, Hossein Vahabi, Christina Lioma, Jakob Grue Simonsen, and Jian-Yun Nie. 2015. A hierarchical recurrent encoder-decoder for generative context-aware query suggestion. In proceedings of the 24th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management. 553--562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V Le. 2014. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems , Vol. 27 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Alexandra Vtyurina, Denis Savenkov, Eugene Agichtein, et al. 2017. Exploring conversational search with humans, assistants, and wizards. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2187--2193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Zhongyuan Wang, Haixun Wang, Ji-Rong Wen, and Yanghua Xiao. 2015. An inference approach to basic level of categorization. In Proceedings of the 24th acm international on conference on information and knowledge management. 653--662.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ryen W White and Resa A Roth. 2009. Exploratory search: Beyond the query-response paradigm. Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services, Vol. 1, 1 (2009), 1--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wentao Wu, Hongsong Li, Haixun Wang, and Kenny Q Zhu. 2012. Probase: A probabilistic taxonomy for text understanding. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. 481--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Hamed Zamani, Susan Dumais, Nick Craswell, Paul Bennett, and Gord Lueck. 2020a. Generating clarifying questions for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the web conference 2020. 418--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Hamed Zamani, Gord Lueck, Everest Chen, et al. 2020b. Mimics: A large-scale data collection for search clarification. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 3189--3196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2019. Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09675 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Ziliang Zhao, Zhicheng Dou, Yu Guo, Zhao Cao, and Xiaohua Cheng. 2023. Improving Search Clarification with Structured Information Extracted from Search Results. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Long Beach, CA, USA) (KDD '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3549--3558. https://doi.org/10.1145/3580305.3599389Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Ziliang Zhao, Zhicheng Dou, Jiaxin Mao, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2022. Generating Clarifying Questions with Web Search Results. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 234--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Yutao Zhu, Huaying Yuan, Shuting Wang, Jiongnan Liu, Wenhan Liu, Chenlong Deng, Zhicheng Dou, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2023. Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Survey. CoRR , Vol. abs/2308.07107 (2023). ioGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mining Exploratory Queries for Conversational Search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WWW '24: Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024
      May 2024
      4826 pages
      ISBN:9798400701719
      DOI:10.1145/3589334

      Copyright © 2024 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)60
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)60

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader