skip to main content
10.1145/3589132.3625655acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

TAP: A Comprehensive Data Repository for Traffic Accident Prediction in Road Networks

Published:22 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Road safety is a major global public health concern, and effective prediction of traffic accidents at a fine-grained spatial scale plays a critical role in reducing roadway deaths and serious injuries. However, previous studies have either overlooked implicit spatial correlations or inadequately simulated road structures due to the lack of graph-structured datasets. To bridge this gap, we introduce a graph-based Traffic Accident Prediction (TAP) data repository, along with two representative tasks: accident occurrence and severity prediction. With its real-world graph structures, comprehensive geographical coverage, and rich geospatial features, this repository has considerable potential to facilitate various traffic-related tasks. We extensively evaluate eleven Graph Neural Network (GNN) baselines using the constructed datasets. We also develop a novel GNN-based model, which can capture additional angular and directional information from road networks. We demonstrate that the proposed model consistently outperforms the baselines. The data and code are available at https://github.com/baixianghuang/travel.

References

  1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2022. Early Estimate of Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities in 2021. Technical Report. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813283Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Microsoft Bing. 2022. Bing Map Traffic API. https://www.bingmapsportal.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Quanjun Chen, Xuan Song, Harutoshi Yamada, and Ryosuke Shibasaki. 2016. Learning deep representation from big and heterogeneous data for traffic accident inference. In Thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. New York City Police Department. 2023. New York City Motor Vehicle Collisions. Retrieved June 22, 2023 from https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Public-Safety/Motor-Vehicle-Collisions-Crashes/h9gi-nx95Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). 2023. Automated enforcement laws. https://www.iihs.org/topics/red-light-running/automated-enforcement-lawsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Baixiang Huang, Bryan Hooi, and Kai Shu. 2023. TAP: A Comprehensive Data Repository for Traffic Accident Prediction in Road Networks (Long Version). arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08640 (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yaguang Li, Rose Yu, Cyrus Shahabi, and Yan Liu. 2017. Diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network: Data-driven traffic forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01926 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Daryl Lloyd. 2016. Reported road casualties in Great Britain: Main results 2015. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sobhan Moosavi, Mohammad Hossein Samavatian, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Radu Teodorescu, and Rajiv Ramnath. 2019. Accident risk prediction based on heterogeneous sparse data: New dataset and insights. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 33--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Alameen Najjar, Shun'ichi Kaneko, and Yoshikazu Miyanaga. 2017. Combining satellite imagery and open data to map road safety. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nominatim. 2023. Nominatim. https://nominatim.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. City of Chicago. 2023. Chicago Traffic Crashes. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/traffic-crashes-crashesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. 2022. New York State Motor Vehicle Crashes. Retrieved June 22, 2023 from https://data.ny.gov/Transportation/Motor-Vehicle-Crashes-Vehicle-Information-Three-Ye/xe9x-a24fGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. UK Department of Transport. 2016. UK Accidents. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/daveianhickey/2000-16-traffic-flow-england-scotland-walesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jutaek Oh, Simon P Washington, and Doohee Nam. 2006. Accident prediction model for railway-highway interfaces. Accident Analysis & Prevention 38, 2 (2006), 346--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. OpenStreetMap. 2023. OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sarbaz Othman, Robert Thomson, and Gunnar Lannér. 2009. Identifying critical road geometry parameters affecting crash rate and crash type. In Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine/Annual Scientific Conference, Vol. 53. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, 155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Seong-hun Park, Sung-min Kim, and Young-guk Ha. 2016. Highway traffic accident prediction using VDS big data analysis. The Journal of Supercomputing 72, 7 (2016), 2815--2831.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Maryland State Police. 2023. Maryland Statewide Vehicle Crashes. Retrieved June 22, 2023 from https://opendata.maryland.gov/Public-Safety/Maryland-Statewide-Vehicle-Crashes/65du-s3quGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Moosavi Sobhan. 2023. US Accidents Dataset. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/sobhanmoosavi/us-accidentsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. SWOV. 2012. Fact Sheet: The relation between speed and crashes. https://shorturl.at/uJLO2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. TRIP. 2022. Addressing America's Traffic Safety Crisis: Examining The Causes of Increasing U.S. Traffic Fatalities and Identifying Solutions to Improve Road User Safety. Technical Report. https://tripnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/TRIP_Addressing_Americas_Traffic_Safety_Crisis_Report_June_2022.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation. 2023. Safety Countermeasures initiative. https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasuresGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. WHO et al. 2018. Global status report on road safety 2018: summary. Technical Report. World Health Organization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rose Yu, Yaguang Li, Cyrus Shahabi, Ugur Demiryurek, and Yan Liu. 2017. Deep learning: A generic approach for extreme condition traffic forecasting. In Proceedings of the 2017 SIAM international Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 777--785.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Zhengyang Zhou, Yang Wang, Xike Xie, Lianliang Chen, and Hengchang Liu. 2020. RiskOracle: A Minute-Level Citywide Traffic Accident Forecasting Framework. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 1258--1265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Zhengyang Zhou, Yang Wang, Xike Xie, Lianliang Chen, and Chaochao Zhu. 2020. Foresee urban sparse traffic accidents: A spatiotemporal multi-granularity perspective. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiaohua Zhu and Mark Antony Freeman. 2019. An evaluation of US municipal open data portals: A user interaction framework. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70, 1 (2019), 27--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. TAP: A Comprehensive Data Repository for Traffic Accident Prediction in Road Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSPATIAL '23: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      November 2023
      686 pages
      ISBN:9798400701689
      DOI:10.1145/3589132

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author(s)

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 December 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader