skip to main content
10.1145/3586183.3606809acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Stereoscopic Viewing and Monoscopic Touching: Selecting Distant Objects in VR Through a Mobile Device

Published:29 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this study, we explore a new way to complementarily utilize the immersive visual output of VR and the physical haptic input of a smartphone. In particular, we focus on interacting with distant virtual objects using a smartphone in a through-plane manner and present a novel selection technique that overcomes the binocular parallax that occurs in such an arrangement. In our proposed technique, when a user in the stereoscopic viewing mode needs to perform a distant selection, the user brings the fingertip near the screen of the mobile device, triggering a smoothly animated transition to the monoscopic touching mode. Using a novel proof-of-concept implementation that utilizes a transparent acrylic panel, we conducted a user study and found that the proposed technique is significantly quicker, more precise, more direct, and more intuitive compared to the ray casting baseline. Subsequently, we created VR applications that explore the rich and interesting use cases of the proposed technique.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Ferran Argelaguet and Carlos Andujar. 2009. Visual feedback techniques for virtual pointing on stereoscopic displays. In Proc. VRST ’09. 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1643928.1643966Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rahul Arora, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Tovi Grossman, George Fitzmaurice, and Karan Singh. 2018. SymbiosisSketch: combining 2D & 3D sketching for designing detailed 3D objects in situ. In Proc. CHI ’18. Article 185, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173759Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Domagoj Baričević, Cha Lee, Matthew Turk, Tobias Höllerer, and Doug A. Bowman. 2012. A hand-held AR magic lens with user-perspective rendering. In Proc. ISMAR ’12. 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2012.6402557Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Patrick Baudisch, Nathaniel Good, and Paul Stewart. 2001. Focus plus context screens: combining display technology with visualization techniques. In Proc. UIST ’01. 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/502348.502354Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Verena Biener, Travis Gesslein, Daniel Schneider, Felix Kawala, Alexander Otte, Per Ola Kristensson, Michel Pahud, Eyal Ofek, Cuauhtli Campos, Matjaž Kljun, Klen Čopič Pucihar, and Jens Grubert. 2022. PoVRPoint: authoring presentations in mobile virtual reality. TVCG 28, 5 (May 2022), 2069–2079. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3150474Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Verena Biener, Daniel Schneider, Travis Gesslein, Alexander Otte, Bastian Kuth, Per Ola Kristensson, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, and Jens Grubert. 2020. Breaking the screen: interaction across touchscreen boundaries in virtual reality for mobile knowledge workers. TVCG 26, 12 (Dec 2020), 3490–3502. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3023567Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Xiang Cao, Jacky Jie Li, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2008. Peephole pointing: modeling acquisition of dynamically revealed targets. In Proc. CHI ’08. 1699–1708. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Rajkumar Darbar, Arnaud Prouzeau, Joan Odicio-Vilchez, Thibault Lainé, and Martin Hachet. 2021. Exploring smartphone-enabled text selection in AR-HMD. In Proc. GI ’21. 117–126. https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2021.14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Tobias Drey, Jan Gugenheimer, Julian Karlbauer, Maximilian Milo, and Enrico Rukzio. 2020. VRSketchIn: exploring the design space of pen and tablet interaction for 3D sketching in virtual reality. In Proc. CHI ’20. Article 501, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376628Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Danilo Gasques, Janet G. Johnson, Tommy Sharkey, and Nadir Weibel. 2019. What you sketch is what you get: quick and easy augmented reality prototyping with PintAR. In CHI ’19 Extended Abstracts. Article LBW1416, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312847Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Travis Gesslein, Verena Biener, Philipp Gagel, Daniel Schneider, Per Ola Kristensson, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, and Jens Grubert. 2020. Pen-based interaction with spreadsheets in mobile virtual reality. In Proc. ISMAR ’20. 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Tovi Grossman and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Pointing at trivariate targets in 3D environments. In Proc. CHI ’04. 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985749Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jens Grubert, Matthias Heinisch, Aaron Quigley, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2015. MultiFi: multi fidelity interaction with displays on and around the body. In Proc. CHI ’15. 3933–3942. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702331Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol., Vol. 52. 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Sebastian Hubenschmid, Johannes Zagermann, Simon Butscher, and Harald Reiterer. 2021. STREAM: exploring the combination of spatially-aware tablets with augmented reality head-mounted displays for immersive analytics. In Proc. CHI ’21. Article 469, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ernst Kruijff, J. Edward Swan, and Steven Feiner. 2010. Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited. In Proc. ISMAR ’10. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643530Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ricardo Langner, Marc Satkowski, Wolfgang Büschel, and Raimund Dachselt. 2021. MARVIS: combining mobile devices and augmented reality for visual data analysis. In Proc. CHI ’21. Article 468, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Khanh-Duy Le, Tanh Quang Tran, Karol Chlasta, Krzysztof Krejtz, Morten Fjeld, and Andreas Kunz. 2021. VXSlate: exploring combination of head movements and mobile touch for large virtual display interaction. In Proc. DIS ’21. 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462076Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Joon Hyub Lee and Seok-Hyung Bae. 2013. Binocular cursor: enabling selection on transparent displays troubled by binocular parallax. In Proc. CHI ’13. 3169–3172. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466433Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Joon Hyub Lee, Seok-Hyung Bae, Jinyung Jung, and Hayan Choi. 2012. Transparent display interaction without binocular parallax. In UIST ’12 Adjunct. 97–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380296.2380340Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Joon Hyub Lee, Donghyeok Ma, Haena Cho, and Seok-Hyung Bae. 2021. Post-Post-It: a spatial ideation system in VR for overcoming limitations of physical Post-it notes. In CHI ’21 Extended Abstracts. Article 300, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451786Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Weizhou Luo, Eva Goebel, Patrick Reipschläger, Mats Ole Ellenberg, and Raimund Dachselt. 2021. Exploring and slicing volumetric medical data in augmented reality using a spatially-aware mobile device. In ISMAR ’21 Adjunct. 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct54149.2021.00076Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Akhmajon Makhsadov, Donald Degraen, André Zenner, Felix Kosmalla, Kamila Mushkina, and Antonio Krüger. 2022. VRySmart: a framework for embedding smart devices in virtual reality. In CHI ’22 Extended Abstracts. Article 358, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519717Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Fabrice Matulic, Aditya Ganeshan, Hiroshi Fujiwara, and Daniel Vogel. 2021. Phonetroller: visual representations of fingers for precise touch input with mobile phones in VR. In Proc. CHI ’21. Article 129, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445583Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Manuel Meier, Paul Streli, Andreas Fender, and Christian Holz. 2021. TapID: rapid touch interaction in virtual reality using wearable sensing. In Proc. VR ’21. 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00076Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Meta. 2020. Infinite Office. Retrieved Sep 1, 2022 from https://youtu.be/5_bVkbG1ZCoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mark R. Mine. 1995. Virtual environment interaction techniques. Technical Report TR95-018. UNC Chapel Hill CS Dept.1–18 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberto A. Montano-Murillo, Cuong Nguyen, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Sriram Subramanian, Stephen DiVerdi, and Diego Martinez-Plasencia. 2020. Slicing-volume: hybrid 3D/2D multi-target selection technique for dense virtual environments. In Proc. VR ’20. 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Erwan Normand and Michael J. McGuffin. 2018. Enlarging a smartphone with AR to create a handheld VESAD (virtually extended screen-aligned display). In Proc. ISMAR ’18. 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2018.00043Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jeffrey S. Pierce, Andrew S. Forsberg, Matthew J. Conway, Seung Hong, Robert C. Zeleznik, and Mark R. Mine. 1997. Image plane interaction techniques in 3D immersive environments. In Proc. I3D ’97. 39–ff.https://doi.org/10.1145/253284.253303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Carolin Reichherzer, Jack Fraser, Damien Constantine Rompapas, and Mark Billinghurst. 2021. SecondSight: a framework for cross-device augmented reality interfaces. In CHI ’21 Extended Abstracts. Article 234, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451839Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Houssem Saidi, Emmanuel Dubois, and Marcos Serrano. 2021. HoloBar: rapid command execution for head-worn AR exploiting around the field-of-view interaction. In Proc. CHI ’21. Article 745, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Dieter Schmalstieg, L. Miguel Encarnação, and Zsolt Szalavári. 1999. Using transparent props for interaction with the virtual table. In Proc. I3D ’99. 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1145/300523.300542Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Martin Spindler, Wolfgang Büschel, and Raimund Dachselt. 2012. Use your head: tangible windows for 3D information spaces in a tabletop environment. In Proc. ITS ’12. 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1145/2396636.2396674Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Hemant Bhaskar Surale, Aakar Gupta, Mark Hancock, and Daniel Vogel. 2019. TabletInVR: exploring the design space for using a multi-touch tablet in virtual reality. In Proc. CHI ’19. Article 13, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Arda Ege Unlu and Robert Xiao. 2021. PAIR: phone as an augmented immersive reality controller. In Proc. VRST ’21. Article 27, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3489849.3489878Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Klen Čopič Pucihar, Paul Coulton, and Jason Alexander. 2014. The use of surrounding visual context in handheld AR: device vs. user perspective rendering. In Proc. CHI ’14. 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557125Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Shengzhi Wu, Daragh Byrne, and Molly Wright Steenson. 2020. “Megereality”: leveraging physical affordances for multi-device gestural interaction in augmented reality. In CHI ’20 Extended Abstracts. Article INT008, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383170Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Fengyuan Zhu and Tovi Grossman. 2020. BISHARE: exploring bidirectional interactions between smartphones and head-mounted augmented reality. In Proc. CHI ’20. Article 106, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Stereoscopic Viewing and Monoscopic Touching: Selecting Distant Objects in VR Through a Mobile Device

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '23: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
      October 2023
      1825 pages
      ISBN:9798400701320
      DOI:10.1145/3586183

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)257
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)52

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format