skip to main content
10.1145/3586183.3606738acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

RadarFoot: Fine-grain Ground Surface Context Awareness for Smart Shoes

Published:29 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Everyday, billions of people use footwear for walking, running, or exercise. Of emerging interest are “smart footwear”, which help users track gait, count steps or even analyse performance. However, such nascent footwear lack fine-grain ground surface context awareness, which could allow them to adapt to the conditions and create usable functions and experiences. Hence, this research aims to recognize the walking surface using a radar sensor embedded in a shoe, enabling ground context-awareness. Using data collected from 23 participants from an in-the-wild setting, we developed several classification models. We show that our model can detect five common terrain types with an accuracy of 80.0% and further ten terrain types with an accuracy of 66.3%, while moving. Importantly, it can detect the gait motion types such as ‘walking’, ‘stepping up’, ‘stepping down’, ‘still’, with an accuracy of 90%. Finally, we present potential use cases and insights for future work based on such ground-aware smart shoes.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Gianluca Agresti and Simone Milani. 2019. Material identification using RF sensors and convolutional neural networks. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 3662–3666.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. W Al-Nuaimy, Y Huang, M Nakhkash, MTC Fang, VT Nguyen, and A Eriksen. 2000. Automatic detection of buried utilities and solid objects with GPR using neural networks and pattern recognition. Journal of applied Geophysics 43, 2-4 (2000), 157–165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Rafael Alencar. 2017. Resampling strategies for imbalanced datasets. Retrieved December 08, 2022 from https://www.kaggle.com/code/rafjaa/resampling-strategies-for-imbalanced-datasets/notebook.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kamiar Aminian, Benoit Mariani, Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu, Constanze Hoskovec, C Büla, J Penders, Carlo Tacconi, and F Marcellini. 2011. Foot worn inertial sensors for gait assessment and rehabilitation based on motorized shoes. In 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, 5820–5823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. John W Arthur. 2008. The fundamentals of electromagnetic theory revisited. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 50, 1 (2008), 19–65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J Bruder, J Carlo, J Gurney, and J Gorman. 2003. IEEE standard for letter designations for radar-frequency bands. IEEE Aerospace & Electronic Systems Society (2003), 1–3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hakan Brunzell. 1999. Detection of shallowly buried objects using impulse radar. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote sensing 37, 2 (1999), 875–886.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Carv. 2022. Carv Digital Ski Coach. Retrieved September 01, 2022 from https://getcarv.com/products/carv.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nitesh V Chawla, Kevin W Bowyer, Lawrence O Hall, and W Philip Kegelmeyer. 2002. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of artificial intelligence research 16 (2002), 321–357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fulong Chen, Rosa Lasaponara, and Nicola Masini. 2017. An overview of satellite synthetic aperture radar remote sensing in archaeology: From site detection to monitoring. Journal of Cultural Heritage 23 (2017), 5–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Wenyao Chen, Yimeng Feng, Mark Cardamis, Cheng Jiang, Wei Song, Oula Ghannoum, and Wen Hu. 2022. Soil moisture sensing with mmWave radar. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Workshop on Millimeter-Wave and Terahertz Networks and Sensing Systems. 19–24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mi-Hyeon Cheon, Dong-Gyun Hong, and Donghwa Lee. 2017. Surface crack detection in concrete structures using image processing. In International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications. Springer, 559–564.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Youngjun Cho, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Nicolai Marquardt, and Simon J Julier. 2018. Deep thermal imaging: Proximate material type recognition in the wild through deep learning of spatial surface temperature patterns. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Asim Kumar Roy Choudhury. 2014. 2 - Object appearance and colour. In Principles of Colour and Appearance Measurement, Asim Kumar Roy Choudhury (Ed.). Woodhead Publishing, 53–102. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099242.53Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ashutosh Dhekne, Mahanth Gowda, Yixuan Zhao, Haitham Hassanieh, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2018. Liquid: A wireless liquid identifier. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. 442–454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. DIGITSOLE. 2022. Digitsole Smart Insoles. Retrieved September 01, 2022 from https://digitsole.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Don Samitha Elvitigala, Denys JC Matthies, Löic David, Chamod Weerasinghe, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2019. GymSoles: Improving Squats and Dead-Lifts by Visualizing the User’s Center of Pressure. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Don Samitha Elvitigala, Denys JC Matthies, Chamod Weerasinghe, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2021. GymSoles++: Combining Google Glass with Smart Insoles to Improve Body Posture when Performing Squats. In The 14th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference. 48–54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19] evalu. 2020. Retrieved September 01, 2022 from https://www.evalu.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheng Fang, Di Wang, Dezhen Song, and Jun Zou. 2021. Fingertip Pulse-Echo Ultrasound and Optoacoustic Dual-Modal and Dual Sensing Mechanisms Near-Distance Sensor for Ranging and Material Sensing in Robotic Grasping. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 14105–14111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Corinna Feeken, Merlin Wasmann, Wilko Heuten, Dag Ennenga, Heiko Müller, and Susanne Boll. 2016. ClimbingAssist: direct vibro-tactile feedback on climbing technique. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct. 57–60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Feetme. 2020. Smart medical werable to improve mobility. Retrieved September 01, 2022 from https://feetme.fr/en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. III Frampton E. Ellis. US10016015B2, USA. Footwear soles with computer controlled configurable structures.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin Frey. 2007. CabBoots: shoes with integrated guidance system. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. 245–246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C Lee Giles and Walter J Wild. 1982. Fresnel reflection and transmission at a planar boundary from media of equal refractive indices. Applied Physics Letters 40, 3 (1982), 210–212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Michael Gillham, Gareth Howells, Sarah Spurgeon, and Ben McElroy. 2013. Floor covering and surface identification for assistive mobile robotic real-time room localization application. Sensors 13, 12 (2013), 17501–17515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Paul R Gray, Paul J Hurst, Stephen H Lewis, and Robert G Meyer. 2009. Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. NA Hoog, TE van den Berg, and HS Bindra. 2022. A 60 GHz pulsed coherent radar for online monitoring of the withering condition of leaves. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 343 (2022), 113693.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ayanna Howard and Homayoun Seraji. 2001. Vision-based terrain characterization and traversability assessment. journal of robotic systems 18, 10 (2001), 577–587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. SS Hubbard, JE Peterson Jr, EL Majer, PT Zawislanski, KH Williams, J Roberts, and Frank Wobber. 1997. Estimation of permeable pathways and water content using tomographic radar data. The leading EDGE 16, 11 (1997), 1623–1630.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Keigo Iizuka and Alois P Freundorfer. 1983. Detection of nonmetallic buried objects by a step frequency radar. Proc. IEEE 71, 2 (1983), 276–279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Anoosha Iqbal. 2017. Intel powered 90Fun Smart Sports Shoes – perfect partner for athletes!Sports Wearable. Retrieved September 01, 2022 from https://www.sportswearable.net/intel-powered-90fun-smart-sports-shoes-perfect-partner-athletes/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Harish Jonnalagadda. 2017. Xiaomi Mi Smart Shoes review: Obsessively track your workouts. Retrieved September 01, 2022 from https://www.androidcentral.com/xiaomi-mi-smart-shoes-review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Umar S Khan, Waleed Al-Nuaimy, and Fathi E Abd El-Samie. 2010. Detection of landmines and underground utilities from acoustic and GPR images with a cepstral approach. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 21, 7 (2010), 731–740.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Satyam Kumar. 2021. 5 Techniques to work with Imbalanced Data in Machine Learning. Retrieved December 08, 2022 from https://towardsdatascience.com/5-techniques-to-work-with-imbalanced-data-in-machine-learning-80836d45d30c.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Jaime Lien, Nicholas Gillian, M Emre Karagozler, Patrick Amihood, Carsten Schwesig, Erik Olson, Hakim Raja, and Ivan Poupyrev. 2016. Soli: Ubiquitous gesture sensing with millimeter wave radar. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 35, 4 (2016), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yawen Liu, Shihan Lu, and Heather Culbertson. 2022. Texture Classification by Audio-Tactile Crossmodal Congruence. In 2022 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS). IEEE, 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Denys JC Matthies, Thijs Roumen, Arjan Kuijper, and Bodo Urban. 2017. CapSoles: who is walking on what kind of floor?. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Walterio W Mayol-Cuevas, J Juarez-Guerrero, and S Munoz-Gutierrez. 1998. A first approach to tactile texture recognition. In SMC’98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No. 98CH36218), Vol. 5. IEEE, 4246–4250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Anita Meier, Denys JC Matthies, Bodo Urban, and Reto Wettach. 2015. Exploring vibrotactile feedback on the body and foot for the purpose of pedestrian navigation. In Proceedings of the 2nd international Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. moticon. 2020. Sensor insoles for research. Retrieved September 01, 2022 from https://www.moticon.de.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Henrique Oliveira and Paulo Lobato Correia. 2014. CrackIT—An image processing toolbox for crack detection and characterization. In 2014 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). IEEE, 798–802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. MJD Otis and BAJ Ménélas. 2014. Method to determine physical properties of ground, foot-worn sensor therefore, and method to advise a user of a risk of falling based thereon. Patent No. WO 2014/032181 A1 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Joseph A Paradiso, Stacy J Morris, Ari Y Benbasat, and Erik Asmussen. 2004. Interactive therapy with instrumented footwear. In CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1341–1343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Amal Kumar Raychaudhuri. 2022. Reflection and Refraction of Electromagnetic Waves. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8139-4_11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Parisa Momen Roodaki, Fateme Taghian, Saeed Bashirzadeh, and Mohsen Jalaali. 2011. A survey of millimeter-wave technologies. In 2011 international conference on electrical and control engineering. IEEE, 5726–5728.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Maximilian Schrapel, Jonathan Liebers, Michael Rohs, and Stefan Schneegass. 2020. Skiables: Towards a Wearable System Mounted on a Ski Boot for Measuring Slope Conditions. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 320–322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Joseph A Shaw. 2013. Radiometry and the Friis transmission equation. American journal of physics 81, 1 (2013), 33–37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Lynn T Staheli. 1991. Shoes for children: a review.Pediatrics 88, 2 (1991), 371–375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Okeke Stephen, Uchenna Joseph Maduh, and Mangal Sain. 2021. A machine learning method for detection of surface defects on ceramic tiles using convolutional neural networks. Electronics 11, 1 (2021), 55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Matti Strese, Clemens Schuwerk, Albert Iepure, and Eckehard Steinbach. 2016. Multimodal feature-based surface material classification. IEEE transactions on haptics 10, 2 (2016), 226–239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. stridalyzer. 2020. Stridalyzer Performance. Retrieved September 01, 2022 from https://retisense.com/runners-athletes/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. J. van Brakel. 2014. Robust Peak Detection Algorithm Using z-Scores. Retrieved December 08, 2022 from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22583391/peak-signal-detection-in-realtime-timeseries-data/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Jaap J van Netten, MJ Jannink, Juha M Hijmans, JH Geertzen, and Klaas Postema. 2010. Use and usability of custom-made orthopedic shoes. J Rehabil Res Dev 47, 1 (2010), 73–81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Chenshu Wu, Feng Zhang, Beibei Wang, and KJ Ray Liu. 2020. mSense: Towards mobile material sensing with a single millimeter-wave radio. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 3 (2020), 1–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Kaishun Wu. 2016. Wi-metal: Detecting metal by using wireless networks. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Hui-Shyong Yeo, Barrett Ens, and Aaron Quigley. 2017. Tangible UI by object and material classification with radar. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Emerging Technologies. 1–2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Hui-Shyong Yeo, Gergely Flamich, Patrick Schrempf, David Harris-Birtill, and Aaron Quigley. 2016. Radarcat: Radar categorization for input & interaction. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 833–841.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Hugh D Young, Roger A Freedman, and A Lewis Ford. 2012. University physics with modern physics 13th edition. Haettu 11 (2012), 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Diana Zhang, Jingxian Wang, Junsu Jang, Junbo Zhang, and Swarun Kumar. 2019. On the feasibility of wi-fi based material sensing. In The 25th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Qin Zou, Yu Cao, Qingquan Li, Qingzhou Mao, and Song Wang. 2012. CrackTree: Automatic crack detection from pavement images. Pattern Recognition Letters 33, 3 (2012), 227–238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. RadarFoot: Fine-grain Ground Surface Context Awareness for Smart Shoes

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)320
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)74

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format