skip to main content
10.1145/3585088.3593911acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Co-Space: A Tangible System Supporting Social Attention and Social Behavioral Development through Embodied Play for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Early impairments in social attention prevent children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from acquiring social information and disrupt their social behavior development. We present Co-Space, a tangible system that supports children with ASD aged 4-8 years in developing social attention and social behaviors through collaborative and embodied play in a classroom setting. Children can paint tangible hemispheres, insert them on a projection board, and then press or rotate the hemispheres independently or collaboratively to view dynamic audiovisual feedback. We leveraged the strengths of children with ASD (e.g., who may have visual strengths and prefer repetitive actions) by providing them with tangible hemispheres to engage their participation. We utilized codependent design and dynamic audiovisual cues to facilitate children’s social attention and encourage their collaboration and potential social behaviors. We demonstrated multiple ways to integrate the tangible system into classroom activities. We discuss the benefits of designing tangible systems for supporting social attention and social behaviors for children with ASD through play in the classroom.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. A. Battocchi, F. Pianesi, D. Tomasini, M. Zancanaro, G. Esposito, P. Venuti, A. Ben Sasson, E. Gal, and P. L. Weiss. 2009. Collaborative Puzzle Game: A Tabletop Interactive Game for Fostering Collaboration in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (Banff, Alberta, Canada) (ITS ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1145/1731903.1731940Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Laura Boccanfuso, Erin Barney, Claire Foster, Yeojin Amy Ahn, Katarzyna Chawarska, Brian Scassellati, and Frederick Shic. 2016. Emotional robot to examine different play patterns and affective responses of children with and without ASD. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/hri.2016.7451729Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Marcia Jean Carter. 2014. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Therapeutic recreation journal 48, 3 (2014), 275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Geraldine Dawson, Andrew N Meltzoff, Julie Osterling, Julie Rinaldi, and Emily Brown. 1998. Children with autism fail to orient to naturally occurring social stimuli. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 28 (1998), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026043926488Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Geraldine Dawson, Karen Toth, Robert Abbott, Julie Osterling, Jeff Munson, Annette Estes, and Jane Liaw. 2004. Early social attention impairments in autism: social orienting, joint attention, and attention to distress.Developmental psychology 40, 2 (2004), 271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.271Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kathy Ralabate Doody, MBA Jana Mertz, 2013. Preferred play activities of children with autism spectrum disorder in naturalistic settings. North American Journal of Medicine and Science 6, 3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7156/najms.2013.0603128Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michelle A Dunn, Hilary Gomes, and Judith Gravel. 2008. Mismatch negativity in children with autism and typical development. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 38 (2008), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0359-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Min Fan, Alissa N. Antle, Carman Neustaedter, and Alyssa F. Wise. 2014. Exploring How a Co-Dependent Tangible Tool Design Supports Collaboration in a Tabletop Activity. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660398.2660402Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. William Farr, Nicola Yuill, and Hayes Raffle. 2010. Social benefits of a tangible user interface for children with autistic spectrum conditions. Autism 14, 3 (2010), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361310363280Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gill Althia Francis, William Farr, Silvana Mareva, and Jenny Louise Gibson. 2019. Do Tangible User Interfaces promote social behaviour during free play? A comparison of autistic and typically-developing children playing with passive and digital construction toys. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 58 (2019), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.08.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Juan Guo and Dongmei Li. 2021. Effects of Image-Sandplay Therapy on the Mental Health and Subjective Well-Being of Children with Autism. Iranian Journal of Public Health 50, 10 (Oct. 2021), 2046–2054. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i10.7505Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kori M. Inkpen, Wai-ling Ho-Ching, Oliver Kuederle, Stacey D. Scott, and Garth B. D. Shoemaker. 1999. This is Fun! We’re All Best Friends and We’re All Playing: Supporting Children’s Synchronous Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (Palo Alto, California) (CSCL ’99). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 31–es. https://doi.org/10.5555/1150240.1150271Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Elysa J Marco, Leighton BN Hinkley, Susanna S Hill, and Srikantan S Nagarajan. 2011. Sensory processing in autism: a review of neurophysiologic findings. Pediatric research 69, 8 (2011), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1203/pdr.0b013e3182130c54Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sonia Mastrangelo. 2009. Play and the child with autism spectrum disorder: From possibilities to practice.International journal of play therapy 18, 1 (2009), 13. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013810Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Peter Mundy, Marian Sigman, Judy Ungerer, and Tracy Sherman. 1986. Defining the social deficits of autism: The contribution of non-verbal communication measures. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry 27, 5 (1986), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1986.tb00190.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Antonella Nonnis and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2019. Mazi: Tangible Technologies as a Channel for Collaborative Play. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300670Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kathy Ralabate Doody Ph D. 2014. How to Use Play as a Teaching Tool for Children with ASD. (2014). https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/cwcpstriaininginstitute/1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Moushumi Sharmin, Md Monsur Hossain, Abir Saha, Maitraye Das, Margot Maxwell, and Shameem Ahmed. 2018. From Research to Practice: Informing the Design of Autism Support Smart Technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173676Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Vianey Vazquez, Carlos Cardenas, Franceli L. Cibrian, and Mónica Tentori. 2016. Designing a Musical Fabric-Based Surface to Encourage Children with Autism to Practice Motor Movements. In Proceedings of the 6th Mexican Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Colima, Mexico) (MexIHC’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967175.2967384Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lilia Villafuerte, Milena Markova, and Sergi Jorda. 2012. Acquisition of Social Abilities through Musical Tangible User Interface: Children with Autism Spectrum Condition and the Reactable. In CHI ’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI EA ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 745–760. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212847Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Xiyue Wang, Kazuki Takashima, Tomoaki Adachi, and Yoshifumi Kitamura. 2021. Can Playing with Toy Blocks Reflect Behavior Problems in Children?. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 540, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445119Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Alyssa Friend Wise, Alissa Nicole Antle, Jillian Warren, Aaron May, Min Fan, and Anna Macaranas. 2015. What kind of world do you want to live in? Positive interdependence and collaborative processes in the tangible tabletop land-use planning game Youtopia. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].https://doi.org/10.22318/cscl2015.221Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Qin Wu, Chenmei Yu, Yanjun Chen, Jiayu Yao, Xi Wu, Xiaolan Peng, and Teng Han. 2020. Squeeze the Ball: Designing an Interactive Playground towards Aiding Social Activities of Children with Low-Function Autism. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376888Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Felice C Yuen. 2004. “It was fun… I liked drawing my thoughts”: using drawings as a part of the focus group process with children. Journal of leisure research 36, 4 (2004), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2004.11950032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Co-Space: A Tangible System Supporting Social Attention and Social Behavioral Development through Embodied Play for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IDC '23: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference
      June 2023
      824 pages
      ISBN:9798400701313
      DOI:10.1145/3585088

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 June 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

      Upcoming Conference

      IDC '24
      Interaction Design and Children
      June 17 - 20, 2024
      Delft , Netherlands

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format