skip to main content
10.1145/3584931.3606979acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Urgency Builds Trust: A Voice Agent's Emotional Expression in an Emergency

Published:14 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Voice agents play a crucial role in providing verbal guidance to users, especially during emergency situations to ensure their successful evacuation. While the vocal presentation of emotion significantly impacts communication effectiveness in human-agent interaction, the context-dependent impacts of emotional voice in an emergency setting remain unexplored. This study investigates the effects of voice agents’ emotional expressions conveyed through tone (i.e., Calm vs. Urgent) during a fire emergency simulation. Participants (N=30) conducted an online simulation game where a voice agent instruct them on how to evacuate from a building, while their evacuation time was tracked. After the game, participants evaluated the task experience and the voice agent’s trustworthiness and context-appropriateness. Results show that the voice agent using an urgent voice increased the participants’ cognitive trust in the agent and context-appropriateness to the emergency, compared to the agent using a calm voice. The study findings provide design implications for a voice agent’s emergency instructions, aiming for an effective evacuation process.

References

  1. Sibel Adali, Robert Escriva, Mark K Goldberg, Mykola Hayvanovych, Malik Magdon-Ismail, Boleslaw K Szymanski, William A Wallace, and Gregory Williams. 2010. Measuring behavioral trust in social networks. In 2010 IEEE international conference on intelligence and security informatics. IEEE, 150–152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kyoko Arai. 2013. How to transmit disaster information effectively: A linguistic perspective on Japan’s Tsunami Warnings and Evacuation Instructions. International journal of disaster risk science 4, 3 (2013), 150–158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Praveen Damacharla, Parashar Dhakal, Sebastian Stumbo, Ahmad Y Javaid, Subhashini Ganapathy, David A Malek, Douglas C Hodge, and Vijay Devabhaktuni. 2019. Effects of voice-based synthetic assistant on performance of emergency care provider in training. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 29, 1 (2019), 122–143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jill L Drury, Laurel Riek, and Nathan Rackliffe. 2006. A decomposition of UAV-related situation awareness. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. 88–94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Judy Edworthy, Elizabeth Hellier, Kathryn Walters, Wendy Clift-Mathews, and Mark Crowther. 2003. Acoustic, semantic and phonetic influences in spoken warning signal words. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 17, 8 (2003), 915–933.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen. 1977. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric 10, 2 (1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jonas Foehr and Claas Christian Germelmann. 2020. Alexa, can I trust you? Exploring consumer paths to trust in smart voice-interaction technologies. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 5, 2 (2020), 181–205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Quehong Gan, Zhen Liu, Tingting Liu, and Yanjie Chai. 2022. An indoor evacuation guidance system with an AR virtual agent. Procedia Computer Science 213 (2022), 636–642.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Judith A Hall and Mark L Knapp. 2013. Welcome to the handbook of nonverbal communication. Nonverbal communication (2013), 3–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhongyi Huang, Siqi Cao, Zhiming Fang, Rui Ye, Zi Wang, and Xiaolian Li. 2021. Effect of voice alarms on temporal characteristics of the evacuation process inside metro train carriages: an experiment study. Safety science 142 (2021), 105403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jieun Kim, Woochan Kim, Jungwoo Nam, and Hayeon Song. 2020. "I Can Feel Your Empathic Voice": Effects of Nonverbal Vocal Cues in Voice User Interface. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sherrie YX Komiak and Izak Benbasat. 2006. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS quarterly (2006), 941–960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Celeste Paul and Anita Komlodi. 2012. Emotion as an indicator for future interruptive notification experiences. In CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2003–2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ioannis Politis, Stephen Brewster, and Frank Pollick. 2015. Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications. 3–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. David Purser. 2010. Comparisons of evacuation efficiency and pre-travel activity times in response to a sounder and two different voice alarm messages. In Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2008. Springer, 121–134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lisong Qiu, Yingwai Shiu, Pingping Lin, Ruihua Song, Yue Liu, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2020. What If Bots Feel Moods?. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1161–1170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tracy Sanders, Kristin E Oleson, Deborah R Billings, Jessie YC Chen, and Peter A Hancock. 2011. A model of human-robot trust: Theoretical model development. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 55. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1432–1436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Ilaria Torre and Laurence White. 2021. Trust in Vocal Human–Robot Interaction: Implications for Robot Voice Design. In Voice Attractiveness. Springer, 299–316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Cristen Torrey, Susan R Fussell, and Sara Kiesler. 2013. How a robot should give advice. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 275–282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Biao Wang, Shiquan Xiong, Shuping Yi, Qian Yi, and Fangfei Yan. 2019. Measuring network user trust via mouse behavior characteristics under different emotions. In HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust: First International Conference, HCI-CPT 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, July 26–31, 2019, Proceedings 21. Springer, 471–481.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mun On Wong, Hui Zhou, Huaquan Ying, and Sanghoon Lee. 2022. A voice-driven IMU-enabled BIM-based multi-user system for indoor navigation in fire emergencies. Automation in Construction 135 (2022), 104137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Priscilla NY Wong, Duncan P Brumby, Harsha Vardhan Ramesh Babu, and Kota Kobayashi. 2019. Voices in Self-Driving Cars Should be Assertive to More Quickly Grab a Distracted Driver’s Attention. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 165–176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Urgency Builds Trust: A Voice Agent's Emotional Expression in an Emergency

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      October 2023
      596 pages
      ISBN:9798400701290
      DOI:10.1145/3584931

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)118
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format