skip to main content
10.1145/3582768.3582801acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnlpirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enhancing BERT Performance with Contextual Valence Shifters for Panic Detection in COVID-19 Tweets

Published:27 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Panic phenomenon is one of the main challenges in the current pandemic time. In this work, we aim to explore the approaches to detect the panic-related COVID-19 tweets. Aligned to this, we propose an unsupervised clustering approach considering negation cues as an extracted feature input to the pre-trained model. This task cannot be done by simply applying state-of-the-art transformer models, since we observed that they occasionally fail in handling negations. Hence, we propose to utilize features based on Contextual Valence Shifters (CVS) along with the pre-trained BERT embeddings. We evaluate and compare the approaches in an unsupervised setup, using standard clustering metrics on a large set of COVID-19 tweets. The obtained results show that CVS effectively facilitates negation handling (positive/negative tweet discrimination).

References

  1. Dimo Angelov. 2020. Top2Vec: Distributed Representations of Topics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.09470 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Floyd E Bloom, Nicholas C Spitzer, Fred Gage, and Tom Albright. 2009. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Volume 1. Vol. 1. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tadeusz Caliński and Jerzy Harabasz. 1974. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics-theory and Methods 3, 1 (1974), 1–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ricardo Campos, Vítor Mangaravite, Arian Pasquali, Alípio Mário Jorge, Célia Nunes, and Adam Jatowt. 2018. Yake! collection-independent automatic keyword extractor. In European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 806–810.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Qingyu Chen, Alexis Allot, and Zhiyong Lu. 2020. LitCovid: an open database of COVID-19 literature. Nucleic Acids Research (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. David L Davies and Donald W Bouldin. 1979. A cluster separation measure. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence2 (1979), 224–227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). 4171–4186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Anuja Hariharan, Verena Dorner, Christof Weinhardt, and Georg W Alpers. 2017. Detecting panic potential in social media tweets. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaggle. 2020. Coronavirus (covid19) Tweets - early April. https://www.kaggle.com/smid80/coronavirus-covid19-tweets-early-april.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Alistair Kennedy and Diana Inkpen. 2006. Sentiment classification of movie reviews using contextual valence shifters. Computational intelligence 22, 2 (2006), 110–125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D Jolene Kinley, Brian J Cox, Ian Clara, Renee D Goodwin, and Jitender Sareen. 2009. Panic attacks and their relation to psychological and physical functioning in Canadians: results from a nationally representative sample. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 54, 2 (2009), 113–122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. George A Miller, Richard Beckwith, Christiane Fellbaum, Derek Gross, and Katherine J Miller. 1990. Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. International journal of lexicography 3, 4 (1990), 235–244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sara A Morsy and Ahmed Rafea. 2012. Improving document-level sentiment classification using contextual valence shifters. In International conference on application of natural language to information systems. Springer, 253–258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Maria Nicola, Zaid Alsafi, Catrin Sohrabi, Ahmed Kerwan, Ahmed Al-Jabir, Christos Iosifidis, Maliha Agha, and Riaz Agha. 2020. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic: a review. International journal of surgery (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Vo Ngoc Phu and Phan Thi Tuoi. 2014. Sentiment classification using enhanced contextual valence shifters. In 2014 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP). IEEE, 224–229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Livia Polanyi and Annie Zaenen. 2006. Contextual valence shifters. In Computing attitude and affect in text: Theory and applications. Springer, 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Peter J Rousseeuw. 1987. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of computational and applied mathematics 20 (1987), 53–65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Xuguang Zhang, Xiaohu Shu, and Zhen He. 2019. Crowd panic state detection using entropy of the distribution of enthalpy. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 525 (2019), 935–945.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing BERT Performance with Contextual Valence Shifters for Panic Detection in COVID-19 Tweets

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            NLPIR '22: Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval
            December 2022
            241 pages
            ISBN:9781450397629
            DOI:10.1145/3582768

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 27 June 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format