skip to main content
10.1145/3581961.3609896acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

The Influence of Display Location on Motion Sickness: An Analysis Based on 6-DoF SVC Model

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the prevalence of smart cockpits, passengers spend increasingly more time engaging with non-driving related tasks (NDRTs, e.g., in-vehicle entertainment and meetings) in vehicles. However, prolonged NDRT engagement can cause sensory conflict and result in motion sickness. Previous research found that motion sickness is highly associated with head motion, which can further be influenced by the positions of the NDRT displays. To guide the design of the smart cockpit, this paper examines the impact of four common NDRT display locations on passengers’ motion sickness. A motion transfer function was utilized to translate a real-world vehicle trajectory into head motion when passengers looked at displays at different locations. Then, a 6 Degree-of-Freedom subjective vertical conflict model was adopted to evaluate the motion sickness caused by head motion. The results of this study can inform the design of in-vehicle displays and improve passenger comfort.

References

  1. A. Brietzke, R. Pham Xuan, A. Dettmann, and A. C. Bullinger. 2021. Concepts for Vestibular and Visual Stimulation to Mitigate Carsickness in Stop-and-Go-Driving. 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), IEEE, 3909–3916.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benedikt Buchheit, Elena N. Schneider, Mohamad Alayan, Florian Dauth, and Daniel J. Strauss. 2021. Motion sickness prediction in self-driving cars using the 6DOF-SVC model. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 8: 13582–13591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Paul DiZio, Jack Ekchian, Janna Kaplan, 2018. An active suspension system for mitigating motion sickness and enabling reading in a car. Aerospace medicine and human performance 89, 9: 822–829.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. John F. Golding, W. Bles, J. E. Bos, Tamika Haynes, and Michael A. Gresty. 2003. Motion sickness and tilts of the inertial force environment: active suspension systems vs. active passengers. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 74, 3: 220–227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. John F. Golding, A. G. Mueller, and Michael A. Gresty. 2001. A motion sickness maximum around the 0.2 Hz frequency range of horizontal translational oscillation. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 72, 3: 188–192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Grand View Research. 2020. Automotive Digital Cockpit Market Size Report, 2021-2028. Retrieved April 17, 2023 from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/automotive-digital-cockpit-market.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Naoki Isu, Takuya Hasegawa, Ichiro Takeuchi, and Akihiro Morimoto. 2014. Quantitative analysis of time-course development of motion sickness caused by in-vehicle video watching. Displays 35, 2: 90–97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Juffrizal Karjanto, Nidzamuddin Md Yusof, Chao Wang, Jacques Terken, Frank Delbressine, and Matthias Rauterberg. 2018. The effect of peripheral visual feedforward system in enhancing situation awareness and mitigating motion sickness in fully automated driving. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 58: 678–692.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kazuhito Kato and Satoshi Kitazaki. 2006. A study for understanding carsickness based on the sensory conflict theory. SAE technical paper 1: 0096.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ouren X. Kuiper, Jelte E. Bos, and Cyriel Diels. 2018. Looking forward: In-vehicle auxiliary display positioning affects carsickness. Applied Ergonomics 68: 169–175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ouren X. Kuiper, Jelte E. Bos, Cyriel Diels, and Kia Cammaerts. 2019. Moving base driving simulators’ potential for carsickness research. Applied Ergonomics 81: 102889.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. MarketResearch. 2020. Automotive Smart Display Market Size, Share, Industry Analysis by 2030. MarketsandMarkets. Retrieved April 17, 2023 from https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/smart-display-market-25698331.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Sebastian Strumegger, and Sandra Trösterer. 2019. Bubble Margin: Motion Sickness Prevention While Reading on Smartphones in Vehicles. In 660–677.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Akihiro Morimoto, Naoki Isu, Tomohiro Okumura, Yusuke Araki, Atsuo Kawai, and Fumito Masui. 2008. Image Rendering for Reducing Carsickness in Watching Onboard Video Display. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nuno Cristovao. 2022. Everything We know About the Tesla Model S and Model X Redesign. Not a Tesla App. Retrieved July 24, 2023 from https://www.notateslaapp.com/news/65/everything-we-know-about-the-tesla-model-s-and-model-x-redesign.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhanyan Qiu, Mark McGill, Katharina Margareta Theresa Pöhlmann, and Stephen Anthony Brewster. 2022. Display Rotation for Reducing Motion Sickness Caused by Using VR in Vehicles. Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 25–29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J.T. Reason and J.J. Brand. 1975. Motion sickness / J. T. Reason, J. J. Brand. Academic Press, London ; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. A. Saruchi, M. H. M. Ariff, H. Zamzuri, 2021. Motion Sickness Mitigation in Autonomous Vehicle: A Mini-Review. Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia 5, 2: 260–272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Eike A. Schmidt, Ouren X. Kuiper, Stefan Wolter, Cyriel Diels, and Jelte E. Bos. 2020. An international survey on the incidence and modulating factors of carsickness. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 71: 76–87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Joseph Smyth, Jonathan Robinson, Rebecca Burridge, Paul Jennings, and Roger Woodman. 2021. Towards the Management and Mitigation of Motion Sickness–An Update to the Field. Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) Volume III: Sector Based Ergonomics, Springer, 834–840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Takahiro Wada and Norimasa Kamij. 2015. A mathematical model of motion sickness in 6DOF motion and its application to vehicle passengers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.05261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Takahiro Wada and Keigo Yoshida. 2016. Effect of passengers’ active head tilt and opening/closure of eyes on motion sickness in lateral acceleration environment of cars. Ergonomics 59, 8: 1050–1059.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Why Are Rear-Seat Entertainment Systems behind the Times? Car and Driver. Retrieved July 18, 2023 from https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a27062588/rear-seat-entertainment-systems-pros-and-cons/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 11.6’’ Android Rear Seat Entertainment System Monitors for BMW 5 7 X5 X6 5 Series GT. Car Tuning Parts. Retrieved July 18, 2023 from https://www.incarpassion.com/11-6-android-rear-seat-entertainment-system-monitors-for-bmw-5-7-x5-x6-5-series-gt/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Li Auto Inc. Unveils Li L9, Its Flagship Smart SUV | Li Auto Inc. Retrieved July 18, 2023 from https://ir.lixiang.com/news-releases/news-release-details/li-auto-inc-unveils-li-l9-its-flagship-smart-suv/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Coordinate Systems in Automated Driving Toolbox - MATLAB & Simulink. Retrieved April 18, 2023 from https://www.mathworks.com/help/driving/ug/coordinate-systems.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Influence of Display Location on Motion Sickness: An Analysis Based on 6-DoF SVC Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      AutomotiveUI '23 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
      September 2023
      382 pages
      ISBN:9798400701122
      DOI:10.1145/3581961

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 September 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

      Upcoming Conference

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)83
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format