skip to main content
10.1145/3573382.3616077acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Unscripted, Unproduced, Unstaged: Audience Perceptions of Authenticity of Microstreamers

Published:06 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This work-in-progress investigates the perceived authenticity of microstreaming, a unique form of game streaming characterized by gamers streaming for small audiences with mostly non-monetary motivations. Prior research has identified three markers of authenticity in microstreams: unscripted interactions, low production values, and unstaged backgrounds. This study experimentally manipulates these markers to examine their individual and joint effects on perceived authenticity, as well as enjoyment of the streamed content. The findings will contribute to understanding the factors influencing perceived authenticity in microstreaming and shed light on how audience engage with online content creators.

References

  1. Alice Audrezet, Gwarlann de Kerviler, and Julie Guidry Moulard. 2020. Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research 117 (2020), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Nicholas David Bowman and Alan K. Goodboy. 2020. Evolving considerations and empirical approaches to construct validity in communication science. Annals of the International Communication Association 44, 3 (2020), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792791Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nicholas David Bowman and Justin Robert Keene. 2018. A Layered Framework for Considering Open Science Practices. Communication Research Reports 35, 4 (2018), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1513273Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Nicholas David Bowman and Patric R. Spence. 2020. Challenges and Best Practices Associated with Sharing Research Materials and Research Data for Communication Scholars. Communication Studies 71, 4 (2020), 708–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1799488 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1799488Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Nicholas David Bowman, Alexander Vandewalle, Rowan Daneels, Yoon Lee, and Siyang Chen. 2023. Animating a Plausible Past: Perceived Realism and Sense of Place Influence Entertainment of and Tourism Intentions From Historical Video Games. Games and Culture (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231162428Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brian Chan and Kishonna Gray. 2020. Microstreaming, Microcelebrity, and Marginalized Masculinity: Pathways to Visibility and Self-Definition for Black Men in Gaming. Women’s Studies in Communication 43, 4 (2020), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2020.1833634Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mia Consalvo, Martin Lajeunesse, and Alexandru Zanescu. 2020. The authenticity engine: Livestreaming on Twitch. In Proceedings of Digital Games Research Association 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tobias Dienlin 2020. An Agenda for Open Science in Communication. Journal of Communication 71, 1 (2020), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Brooke Duffy. 2017. (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Edgar Erdfelder, Franz Faul, and Axel Buchner. 1996. GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 28, 1 (1996), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Susan Ervin-Tripp. 1964. An Analysis of the Interaction of Language, Topic, and Listener. American Anthropologist 66, 6 (1964), 86–102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/668163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sandra K. Evans, Katy E. Pearce, Jessica Vitak, and Jeffrey W. Treem. 2017. Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22, 1 (2017), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Erving Goffman. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kent Grayson and Radan Martinec. 2004. Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings. Journal of Consumer Research 31, 2 (2004), 296–312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Andrew F. Hayes and Jacob J. Coutts. 2020. Use Omega Rather than Cronbach′s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But...Communication Methods and Measures 14, 1 (2020), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Henry Jenkins. 2009. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mehdi Kaytoue, Adriano Silva, Loïc Cerf, Wagner Meira Jr., and Chedy Raïssi. 2012. Watch me playing, I am a professional: A first study on video game live streaming. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. 1181–1188. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187980.2188259Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Susie Khamis, Lawrence Ang, and Raymond Welling. 2017. Self-branding, ′micro-celebrity′ and the rise of Social Media Influencers. Celebrity Studies 8, 2 (2017), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jooyoung Angela Lee and Matthew S. Eastin. 2021. Perceived authenticity of social media influences: Scale development and validation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 15, 4 (2021), 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2020-0253Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Alexander P. Leith. 2021. Parasocial cues: The ubiquity of parasocial relationships on Twitch. Communication Monographs 88, 1 (2021), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1868544Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Alice E. Marwick. 2013. Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Alice E. Marwick and danah boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13, 1 (2011), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Julie G. Moulard, Dan Hamilton Rice, Colleen P. Garrity, and Sarah M. Mangus. 2014. Artist authenticity: how artists’ passion and commitment shape consumers’ perceptions and behavioral intentions across genders. Psychology and Marketing 31, 8 (2014), 576–590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ray Oldenburg. 1989. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. Paragon House, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mary Beth Oliver, Nicholas David Bowman, Julia K. Woolley, Ryan Rogers, Brett I. Sherrick, and Mun-Youn Chung. 2016. Video Games as Meaningful Entertainment Experiences. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 5, 4 (2016), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000066Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Patrick B. O′Sullivan and Caleb T. Carr. 2018. Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society 20, 3 (2018), 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Andrew Phelps, Nicholas D. Bowman, Mia Consalvo, and Sam Smyth. 2022. Shared spaces as authentic. In Proceedings for Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 55. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/79721Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Andrew Phelps, Nicholas D. Bowman, Mia Consalvo, and Sam Smyth. 2022. Streaming small shared spaces: Exploring the connectedness of the physical spaces of microstreamers and their audience. Selected Papers of Internet Research (2022). https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12224Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Andrew Phelps and Mia Consalvo. 2020. Laboring artists: Art streaming on the videogame platform Twitch. In Proceedings for Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 53. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/64068Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jih-Hsuan Tammy Lin, Nicholas Bowman, Shu-Fang Lin, and Yen-Shen Chen. 2019. Setting the digital stage: Defining game streaming as an entertainment experience. Entertainment Computing 31 (2019), 100309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2019.100309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. T. L. Taylor. 2012. Raising the stakes: e-sports and the professionalization of computer gaming. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Twitch Advertising. 2022. Twitch Advertising Audience. Twitch.com. https://twitchadvertising.tv/audience/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] TwitchMetrics.net. 2023. https://www.twitchmetrics.net/gamesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. TwitchTracker.com. 2023. Twitch live stream statistics. https://twitchtracker.com/statistics/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Peter Vorderer, Dorothée Hefner, Leonard Reinecke, and Christoph Klimmt. 2017. Permanently online, permanently connected. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Philipp Wollborn, Ulf Holder, and Dominik Dornekott. 2021. Entrepreneurial efforts and opportunity costs: Evidence from Twitch streamers. Social Science Research Network (2021). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3801017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Jamie Woodcock and Mark R. Johnson. 2019. Live Streamers on Twitch.tv as Social Media Influencers: Chances and Challenges for Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication 13, 4 (2019), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1630412Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Andrew Young and Grant Wiedenfeld. 2022. A Motivation Analysis of Video Game Microstreamers: ′Finding My People and Myself′ on YouTube and Twitch. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 66, 2 (2022), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2022.2086549Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Unscripted, Unproduced, Unstaged: Audience Perceptions of Authenticity of Microstreamers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)171
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format