skip to main content
10.1145/3565291.3565348acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

BiLSTM with novel feature matrix predicts the binding affinity between MHC-I and peptides

Published:16 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Major histocompatibility complex I (MHC-I) molecules have the characteristic of de-homogeneity which can be recognized by CD8+T cells and plays an important role in antigen delivery. The loss or downregulation of the MHC-I may prevent the immune-mediated reaction. Some tumors may use the mechanism to become invisible in the immune system, causing MHC-I-based immunotherapy to be essential for cancer treatment. To raise the accuracy of targeted immunotherapy, precise and robust prediction of MHC-I affinity can be indispensable. Although traditional experimental methods focused on the comparison of mass spectrometry and flow cytometry to determine the sequence information, experimental technology was expensive and inefficient. Due to the weakness of second-generation sequencing, small-length sequences such as MHC-I may face a high risk of base deletion and mismatch. While machine learning and deep learning methods are mainly based on data mining and statistical inference, without costing too much on biological experiments. In addition, these models have robust generalization ability and accurate performances in several classification and regression tasks, offering confidential results of MHC affinity prediction. In this thesis, we considered 25 biological and sequence features including amino acid (AA) residues, hybrid orbital theory, and 3D physical structure. These computed properties in higher dimensions were further deduced by the specific feature selection algorithm. The final feature maps were integrated into a features matrix (9 x 25), regarded as a large labeled dataset. 222,875 samples were divided into training (178,300 samples) and testing datasets (44,575 samples). With this high-quantity feature matrix, we build several machine learning and deep learning models. Using MSE as the assessment, Bi-LSTM gained the best performance in both training dataset and testing dataset (Training_MSE: 0.0517; Testing_MSE: 0.0594) which was better than the SVM (Training_MSE: 0.0759; Testing_MSE: 0.0757) and DNN (Training_MSE: 0.0736; Testing_MSE: 0.0735). Our results mentions that the Bi-LSTM model may have a robust and stable ability in MHC-I affinity prediction, which can improve the study of bioinformatic study and increase the development of sequence prediction.

References

  1. Sullivan RJ, Atkins MB, Kirkwood JM, Agarwala SS, Clark JI, Ernstoff MS, Fecher L, Gajewski TF, Gastman B, Lawson DH, Lutzky J, McDermott DF, Margolin KA, Mehnert JM, Pavlick AC, Richards JM, Rubin KM, Sharfman W, Silverstein S, Slingluff CL Jr, Sondak VK, Tarhini AA, Thompson JA, Urba WJ, White RL, Whitman ED, Hodi FS, Kaufman HL. An update on the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on tumor immunotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma: version 2.0. J Immunother Cancer. 2018 May 30;6(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0362-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Morrison AH, Byrne KT, Vonderheide RH. Immunotherapy and Prevention of Pancreatic Cancer. Trends Cancer. 2018 Jun;4(6):418-428. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.04.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yoon JS, Song BG, Lee JH, Lee HY, Kim SW, Chang Y, Lee YB, Cho EJ, Yu SJ, Sinn DH, Kim YJ, Lee JH, Yoon JH. Adjuvant cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis of real-world data. BMC Cancer. 2019 May 31;19(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5740-zGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Vonderheide RH, Bayne LJ. Inflammatory networks and immune surveillance of pancreatic carcinoma. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013 Apr;25(2):200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2013.01.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan HP, Samala RK, Hadjiiski LM, Zhou C. Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1213:3-21. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33128-3_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang J, Chen S, Liang H, Zhao Y, Xu Z, Xiao W, Zhang T, Ji R, Chen T, Xiong B, Chen F, Yang J, Lou H. Fully Automatic Classification of Brain Atrophy on NCCT Images in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Pilot Study Using Deep Learning Models. Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 24;13:846348. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.846348Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kido S, Hirano Y, Mabu S. Deep Learning for Pulmonary Image Analysis: Classification, Detection, and Segmentation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1213:47-58. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33128-3_3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tung CW, Ho SY. POPI: predicting immunogenicity of MHC class I binding peptides by mining informative physicochemical properties. Bioinformatics. 2007 Apr 15;23(8):942-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm061Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu Z, Cui Y, Xiong Z, Nasiri A, Zhang A, Hu J. DeepSeqPan, a novel deep convolutional neural network model for pan-specific class I HLA-peptide binding affinity prediction. Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 28;9(1):794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37214-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Antonio Gulli , Amita Kapoor , Sujit Pal (2019).Deep Learning with TensorFlow 2 and Keras – Second Edition. WOW! eBook. ISBN-10: 1838823417Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhao T, Cheng L, Zang T, Hu Y. Peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Binding Prediction Based on Deep Learning With Novel Feature. Front Genet. 2019 Nov 28;10:1191. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01191Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rammensee HG, Falk K, Rötzschke O. Peptides naturally presented by MHC class I molecules. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993;11:213-44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.11.040193.001241Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hobohm U, Meyerhans A. A pattern search method for putative anchor residues in T cell epitopes. Eur J Immunol. 1993 Jun;23(6):1271-6. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830230612Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nielsen M, Lund O, Buus S, Lundegaard C. MHC class II epitope predictive algorithms. Immunology. 2010 Jul;130(3):319-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03268.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng T, Zhao Y, Li X, Lin F, Xu Y, Zhang X, Li Y, Wang R, Lai L. Computation of octanol-water partition coefficients by guiding an additive model with knowledge. J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Nov-Dec;47(6):2140-8. doi: 10.1021/ci700257yGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ertl P, Rohde B, Selzer P. Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. J Med Chem. 2000 Oct 5;43(20):3714-7. doi: 10.1021/jm000942eGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBDT '22: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Big Data Technologies
    September 2022
    454 pages
    ISBN:9781450396875
    DOI:10.1145/3565291

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 December 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format