Omid Pournik
ABSTRACT
The process of developing a computer interpretable, integrated clinical guideline requires multiple considerations and decisions. As part of the CAREPATH project, a holistic approach to comorbidity has been adopted using an integrated clinical guideline for the management of multimorbid patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. The project’s clinical and technical teams would later interpret and implement the integrated clinical guideline into the CAREPATH holistic computer interpretable guideline. Three phases should be completed to accomplish the patient-centered computer interpretable guideline modelling, which include the conceptual modelling, interpretable modelling and localization phases, respectively. This paper describes the methodological viewpoints of this process and the relevant considerations.
- Eda Bilici, George Despotou, and Theodoros N. Arvanitis. 2018. The use of computer-interpretable clinical guidelines to manage care complexities of patients with multimorbid conditions: a review. Digital health 4 (Oct. 2018), 2055207618804927. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618804927Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Rosie Callender. 2018. What Factors Are Associated With Guideline Use and Compliance?Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Otago.Google Scholar
- George Despotou, Gokce B Laleci Erturkmen, Mustafa Yuksel, Bunyamin Sarigul, Pontus Lindman, Marie-Christine Jaulent, Jacques Bouaud, Lamine Traore, Sarah N Lim Choi Keung, Esteban De Manuel, 2020. Localisation, personalisation and delivery of best practice guidelines on an integrated care and cure cloud architecture: The C3-cloud approach to managing multimorbidity. In Digital Personalized Health and Medicine(Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 270). IOS Press, 623–627. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI200235Google Scholar
- Gokce B Laleci Erturkmen, Mustafa Yuksel, Bunyamin Sarigul, Theodoros N Arvanitis, Pontus Lindman, Rong Chen, Lei Zhao, Eric Sadou, Jacques Bouaud, Lamine Traore, 2019. A collaborative platform for management of chronic diseases via guideline-driven individualized care plans. Computational and structural biotechnology journal 17 (2019), 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2019.06.003Google Scholar
- Sheldon Greenfield and Sherrie H. Kaplan. 2017. When clinical practice guidelines collide: finding a way forward. Annals of internal medicine 167, 9 (Nov. 2017), 677–678. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-2665Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lotte Keikes, Milan Kos, Xander AAM Verbeek, Thijs Van Vegchel, Iris D Nagtegaal, Max J Lahaye, Alejandra Méndez Romero, Sandra De Bruijn, Henk MW Verheul, Heidi Rütten, 2021. Conversion of a colorectal cancer guideline into clinical decision trees with assessment of validity. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 33, 2 (March 2021), mzab051. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzab051Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thorsten Meyer and Kolja Wulff. 2019. Issues of comorbidity in clinical guidelines and systematic reviews from a rehabilitation perspective. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine 55, 3 (April 2019), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.23736/s1973-9087.19.05786-1Google Scholar
- Omid Pournik, Bilal Ahmad, Sarah N Lim Choi Keung, Omar Khan, George Despotou, Angelo Consoli, Jaouhar Ayadi, Luca Gilardi, Gokce Banu Laleci Erturkmen, Mustafa Yuksel, 2022. CAREPATH: Developing Digital Integrated Care Solutions for Multimorbid Patients with Dementia. In Advances in Informatics, Management and Technology in Healthcare, J. Mantas et al. (Ed.). Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 295. IOS Press, 487–490. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI220771Google Scholar
- Amir Qaseem, Devan Kansagara, Jennifer S Lin, Reem A Mustafa, Timothy J Wilt, and Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians*. 2019. The development of clinical guidelines and guidance statements by the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians: update of methods. Annals of internal medicine 170, 12 (June 2019), 863–870. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-3290Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrea Juliana Sanabria, Anna Kotzeva, Anna Selva Olid, Sandra Pequeno, Robin WM Vernooij, Laura Martínez García, Yuan Zhang, Ivan Sola, Judith Thornton, and Pablo Alonso-Coello. 2019. Most guideline organizations lack explicit guidance in how to incorporate cost considerations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 116 (Dec. 2019), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Toni Tripp-Reimer, Janet K Williams, Sue E Gardner, Barbara Rakel, Keela Herr, Ann Marie McCarthy, Linda Liu Hand, Stephanie Gilbertson-White, and Catherine Cherwin. 2020. An integrated model of multimorbidity and symptom science. Nursing outlook 68, 4 (July 2020), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.03.003Google Scholar
- William Van Woensel, Syed Sibte Raza Abidi, and Samina Raza Abidi. 2021. Decision support for comorbid conditions via execution-time integration of clinical guidelines using transaction-based semantics and temporal planning. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 118 (Aug. 2021), 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102127Google ScholarDigital Library
- Szymon Wilk, Martin Michalowski, Wojtek Michalowski, Daniela Rosu, Marc Carrier, and Mounira Kezadri-Hamiaz. 2017. Comprehensive mitigation framework for concurrent application of multiple clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 66 (Feb. 2017), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.12.002Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- CAREPATH methodology for development of computer interpretable, integrated clinical guidelines
Recommendations
Versioning computer-interpretable guidelines: Semi-automatic modeling of 'Living Guidelines' using an information extraction method
Objective: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are means to provide evidence-based medical knowledge. In order to make up-to-date ''best'' scientific evidence available these documents need to be updated on an ongoing basis. An effective method to ...
Design patterns for clinical guidelines
Objective: Transforming narrative guidelines into a computer-interpretable formalism is still a bottleneck in the development of decision-support systems. Our goal was to support this step by providing computer-interpretable templates for representing ...
Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines
Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted Computer interpretable guidelines (CIG) methods papers are classifies into eight themes.The themes cover the life-cycle of CIG development.CIG research published in JBI and four additional prominent journals are ...
Comments