skip to main content
10.1145/3560107.3560317acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

Impact of digital transformation on knowledge management practices in Portuguese Public Administration

Published:18 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Several concerns emerge from new management models in the public sector organizations, especially related to their efficiency and effectiveness, as well as work perspectives based on public value, i.e., the contribution of public services to create value for society. The need to increase public organizations’ performance is addressed through innovation. In fact, knowledge and technology are essential assets to improve the processes and the development of new models of service delivery. In the context of society's digitalization, it's important to understand the influence of government administrative modernization processes on knowledge management practices. This exploratory paper presents the research that intends to deepen the study of knowledge management in the public sector, identify the dimensions of the relationship between knowledge management and digital transformation of the State, and understand the implications of Portuguese public administration digitalization on knowledge management practices. Also, to understand if the degree of maturity of knowledge management in organizations enhances process improvement using technology.

References

  1. M. Massaro, J. Dumay, and A. Garlatti, “Public sector knowledge management: A structured literature review,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 530–558, May 2015, doi: 10.1108/JKM-11-2014-0466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. Alvarenga, F. Matos, R. Godina, and J. C. O. Matias, “Digital transformation and knowledge management in the public sector,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 14, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12145824.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. K. Kelly, “The Economics of Ideas,” WIRED, Jun. 01, 1996. Accessed: Apr. 17, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.wired.com/1996/06/romer/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Mcadam and S. Mccreedy, “A critical review of knowledge management models,” The Learning Organization, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 91–100, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. Mcadam and R. Reid, “A comparison of public and private sector perceptions and use of knowledge management,” Journal of European Industrial Training, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 317–329, 2000, [Online]. Available: http://www.mcbup.com/research_registers/tdev.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. K. M. Wiig, “Knowledge management in public administration,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 224–239, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1108/13673270210434331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. K. Edge, “Powerful public sector knowledge management: A school district example,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 42–52, 2005, doi: 10.1108/13673270510629954.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Serenko, T. Hardie, N. Bontis, L. Booker, and K. Sadeddin, “A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (19942008),” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–23, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1108/13673271011015534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. F. Fonseca and C. Carapeto, Governação, Inovação e Tecnologias: O Estado Rede e a Administração Pública do Futuro. Lisboa: Edições Sílabo, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. J. Mc Evoy, M. A. F. Ragab, and A. Arisha, “The effectiveness of knowledge management in the public sector,” Knowledge Management Research and Practice, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 39–51, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/14778238.2018.1538670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. R. Agrifoglio, C. Metallo, and P. di Nauta, “Understanding Knowledge Management in Public Organizations through the Organizational Knowing Perspective: a Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis,” Public Organization Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 137–156, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11115-020-00480-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. di Vaio, R. Palladino, A. Pezzi, and D. E. Kalisz, “The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 123, pp. 220–231, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. de Bem Machado, S. Secinaro, D. Calandra, and F. Lanzalonga, “Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: a structured literature review,” Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14778238.2021.2015261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Impact of digital transformation on knowledge management practices in Portuguese Public Administration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '22: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      October 2022
      623 pages
      ISBN:9781450396356
      DOI:10.1145/3560107

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)427
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)65

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format