skip to main content
10.1145/3558583.3558855acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnanocomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Neural network-based classification of ENG recordings in response to naturally evoked stimulation

Published:03 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper evaluates two different neural network strategies for the classification of electroneurographic (ENG) recordings obtained in response to mechanical stimulations of a rat paw available from an open-access dataset. The first strategy is based on spiking neural networks (SNNs), a new class of artificial neural networks inspired by the information processing solutions of biological neurons. SNNs are considered to be promising for the classification of complex space-time models. The second strategy relies on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a well-established tool for processing structured arrays of data such as images or space-time data. The existing effects of power line noise and other distortions generated by the non-idealities of the acquisition system (e.g., timing jitter) are removed by a suitable pre-processing. The accuracy and F1-score achieved by the SNN and the CNN are reported for a multi-class problem aiming to separate different types of somatosensory stimuli (i.e., nociception, plantar flexion, dorsiflexion, and touch, which are the mechanical stimulations of the dataset) and their different intensities.

References

  1. Sanjeev Agarwal, Ronald J Triolo, Rudi Kobetic, Michael Miller, Carol Bieri, Sahana Kukke, Lori Rohde, and John A Davis. 2003. Long-term user perceptions of an implanted neuroprosthesis for exercise, standing, and transfers after spinal cord injury. Journal of rehabilitation research and development 40, 3 (2003), 241--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Emma Brunton, Christoph W Blau, and Kianoush Nazarpour. 2017. ENG recordings in response to mechanical stimulation. Retrieved August 29, 2022 from https://data.ncl.ac.uk/articles/dataset/ENG_recordings_in_response_to_mechanical_stimulation/10280846Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Emma Brunton, Christoph W Blau, and Kianoush Nazarpour. 2017. Separability of neural responses to standardised mechanical stimulation of limbs. Scientific reports 7, 1 (2017), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Yongqiang Cao, Yang Chen, and Deepak Khosla. 2015. Spiking deep convolutional neural networks for energy-efficient object recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision 113, 1 (2015), 54--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Haowen Fang, Amar Shrestha, and Qinru Qiu. 2020. Multivariate time series classification using spiking neural networks. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Wei Fang, Zhaofei Yu, Yanqi Chen, Timothée Masquelier, Tiejun Huang, and Yonghong Tian. 2021. Incorporating learnable membrane time constant to enhance learning of spiking neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 2661--2671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. David Guiraud, Thomas Stieglitz, Klaus Peter Koch, Jean-Louis Divoux, and Pierre Rabischong. 2006. An implantable neuroprosthesis for standing and walking in paraplegia: 5-year patient follow-up. Journal of neural engineering 3, 4 (2006), 268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Robert Gütig. 2016. Spiking neurons can discover predictive features by aggregate-label learning. Science 351, 6277 (2016), aab4113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sašo Jezernik and Thomas Sinkjaer. 1999. On statistical properties of whole nerve cuff recordings. IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering 46, 10 (1999), 1240--1245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ryan GL Koh, Michael Balas, Adrian I Nachman, and José Zariffa. 2020. Selective peripheral nerve recordings from nerve cuff electrodes using convolutional neural networks. Journal of Neural Engineering 17, 1 (2020), 016042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Christopher E Larson and Ellis Meng. 2020. A review for the peripheral nerve interface designer. Journal of neuroscience methods 332 (2020), 108523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wolfgang Maass. 1997. Networks of spiking neurons: the third generation of neural network models. Neural networks 10, 9 (1997), 1659--1671.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Benjamin W Metcalfe, Daniel J Chew, Christopher T Clarke, Nick De Neufvillle Donaldson, and John T Taylor. 2015. A new method for spike extraction using velocity selective recording demonstrated with physiological ENG in Rat. Journal of neuroscience methods 251 (2015), 47--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Benjamin W Metcalfe, Alan J Hunter, Jonathan E Graham-Harper-Cater, and John T Taylor. 2021. Array processing of neural signals recorded from the peripheral nervous system for the classification of action potentials. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 347 (2021), 108967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Xavier Navarro, Thilo B Krueger, Natalia Lago, Silvestro Micera, Thomas Stieglitz, and Paolo Dario. 2005. A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System 10, 3 (2005), 229--258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. DB Rao and Sun-Yuan Kung. 1984. Adaptive notch filtering for the retrieval of sinusoids in noise. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, speech, and signal processing 32, 4 (1984), 791--802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Stanisa Raspopovic, Jacopo Carpaneto, Esther Udina, Xavier Navarro, and Silvestro Micera. 2010. On the identification of sensory information from mixed nerves by using single-channel cuff electrodes. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 7, 1 (2010), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Aleid CJ Ruijs, Jean-Bart Jaquet, Sandra Kalmijn, Henk Giele, and Steven ER Hovius. 2005. Median and ulnar nerve injuries: a meta-analysis of predictors of motor and sensory recovery after modern microsurgical nerve repair. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 116, 2 (2005), 484--494.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Christopher Russell, Aidan D Roche, and Samit Chakrabarty. 2019. Peripheral nerve bionic interface: a review of electrodes. International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications 3, 1 (2019), 11--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Wim LC Rutten. 2002. Selective electrical interfaces with the nervous system. Annual review of biomedical engineering 4, 1 (2002), 407--452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin Schuettler, Nick Donaldson, Vipin Seetohul, and John Taylor. 2013. Fibre-selective recording from the peripheral nerves of frogs using a multi-electrode cuff. Journal of neural engineering 10, 3 (2013), 036016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Maria Siemionow and Grzegorz Brzezicki. 2009. Current techniques and concepts in peripheral nerve repair. International review of neurobiology 87 (2009), 141--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Yuang Tang, Brian Wodlinger, and DM Durand. 2014. Bayesian spatial filters for source signal extraction: A study in the peripheral nerve. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 22, 2 (2014), 302--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. John Taylor, Benjamin Metcalfe, Chris Clarke, Daniel Chew, Thomas Nielsen, and Nick Donaldson. 2015. A summary of current and new methods in velocity selective recording (VSR) of electroneurogram (ENG). In 2015 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI. IEEE, 221--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Yujie Wu, Lei Deng, Guoqi Li, Jun Zhu, Yuan Xie, and Luping Shi. 2019. Direct training for spiking neural networks: Faster, larger, better. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 1311--1318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jose Zariffa and Milos R Popovic. 2008. Application of EEG source localization algorithms to the monitoring of active pathways in peripheral nerves. In 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, 4216--4219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Neural network-based classification of ENG recordings in response to naturally evoked stimulation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        NANOCOM '22: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication
        October 2022
        177 pages
        ISBN:9781450398671
        DOI:10.1145/3558583

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 October 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate97of135submissions,72%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader