skip to main content
10.1145/3556564.3558238acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Challenges in platform-independent UWB ranging and localization systems

Published:26 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Ultra-Wideband (UWB) technology has grown in popularity to the point in which there are numerous UWB transceivers on the market that use different center frequencies, bandwidths, or hardware architectures. At the same time, efforts are made to reduce the ranging and localization errors of UWB systems. Until now, not much attention has been dedicated to the cross-platform compatibility of these methods. In this paper, we discuss for the first time the challenges in obtaining platform-independent UWB ranging and localization systems. We derive our observations from a measurement campaign conducted with UWB devices from three different developers. We evaluate the differences in the ranging errors and channel impulse responses of the devices and show how they can affect ranging mitigation methods customized for one device only. Finally, we discuss possible solutions towards platform-independent UWB localization systems.

References

  1. 2020. IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks. Amendment 1: Enhanced Ultra Wideband (UWB) Physical Layers (PHYs) and Associated Ranging Techniques (IEEE Std 802.15. 4z) (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 3db Access AG. 2018. 3DB6830D User Guide. Version 4.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Valentín Barral, Carlos J Escudero, José A García-Naya, and Pedro Suárez-Casal. 2019. Environmental cross-validation of NLOS machine learning classification/mitigation with low-cost UWB positioning systems. Sensors 19, 24 (2019), 5438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. FiRa Consortium. 2022. Retrieved 19 August 2022 from firaconsortium.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tobias Feigl, Ernst Eberlein, Sebastian Kram, and Christopher Mutschler. 2020. Robust ToA-Estimation using Convolutional Neural Networks on Randomized Channel Models. In IPIN. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Laura Flueratoru. 2022. Dataset: Ultra-wideband ranging measurements acquired with three different platforms (Qorvo, TDSR, 3db Access). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Laura Flueratoru, Silvan Wehrli, Michele Magno, Elena Simona Lohan, and Dragos Niculescu. 2021. High-accuracy ranging and localization with ultra-wideband communications for energy-constrained devices. IEEE IoT-J (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jaron Fontaine, Matteo Ridolfi, Ben Van Herbruggen, Adnan Shahid, and Eli De Poorter. 2020. Edge inference for UWB ranging error correction using autoencoders. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 139143--139155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs). 2014. Application of IEEE Std 802.15.4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ismail Guvenc, Sinan Gezici, and Zafer Sahinoglu. 2008. Ultra-wideband range estimation: Theoretical limits and practical algorithms. In IEEE Int'l Conf. on UWB, Vol. 3. IEEE, 93--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Antonio Ramón Jiménez and Fernando Seco. 2016. Comparing Decawave and Bespoon UWB location systems: Indoor/outdoor performance analysis. In IPIN. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sebastian Kram, Maximilian Stahlke, Tobias Feigl, Jochen Seitz, and Jörn Thielecke. 2019. UWB channel impulse responses for positioning in complex environments: A detailed feature analysis. Sensors 19, 24 (2019), 5547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Erik Leitinger, Paul Meissner, Christoph Rüdisser, Gregor Dumphart, and Klaus Witrisal. 2015. Evaluation of position-related information in multipath components for indoor positioning. IEEE JSAC 33, 11 (2015), 2313--2328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. TDSR LLC. 2020. TDSR RangeNet Application Programming Interface (API) Specification. Version 320-0313I.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Decawave Ltd. 2021. DW3000 User Manual. Version 1.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G MacGougan, K O'Keefe, and R Klukas. 2009. UWB ranging and ranging measurement accuracy. Measurement Science and Technology 20, 9 (2009), 0957--0233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Stefano Marano, Wesley M Gifford, Henk Wymeersch, and Moe Z Win. 2010. NLOS identification and mitigation for localization based on UWB experimental data. IEEE JSAC 28, 7 (2010), 1026--1035.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yihong Qi, Hisashi Kobayashi, and Hirohito Suda. 2006. On time-of-arrival positioning in a multipath environment. IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology 55, 5 (2006), 1516--1526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Antonio Ramón Jiménez Ruiz and Fernando Seco Granja. 2017. Comparing Ubisense, Bespoon, and Decawave UWB location systems: Indoor performance analysis. IEEE TIM 66, 8 (2017), 2106--2117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Anthony Schenck, Edwin Walsh, Jonas Reijniers, Ted Ooijevaar, Risang Yudanto, Erik Hostens, Walter Daems, and Jan Steckel. 2018. Information Theoretic Framework for the Optimization of UWB Localization Systems. In IPIN. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lorenz Schmid, David Salido-Monzú, and Andreas Wieser. 2019. Accuracy assessment and learned error mitigation of UWB ToF ranging. In IPIN. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Maximilian Schuh, Hannah Brunner, Michael Stocker, Markus Schuß, Carlo Alberto Boano, and Kay Römer. 2022. First Steps in Benchmarking the Performance of Heterogeneous Ultra-Wideband Platforms. In CPS-IoTBench. IEEE, 34--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Yuzhe Yang, Kaiwen Zha, Yingcong Chen, Hao Wang, and Dina Katabi. 2021. Delving into deep imbalanced regression. In Int'l Conf. on Machine Learning. 11842--11851.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kegen Yu, Kai Wen, Yingbing Li, Shuai Zhang, and Kefei Zhang. 2018. A novel NLOS mitigation algorithm for UWB localization in harsh indoor environments. IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology 68, 1 (2018), 686--699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Challenges in platform-independent UWB ranging and localization systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WiNTECH '22: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental evaluation & CHaracterization
        October 2022
        89 pages
        ISBN:9781450395274
        DOI:10.1145/3556564

        Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 October 2022

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WiNTECH '22 Paper Acceptance Rate11of15submissions,73%Overall Acceptance Rate63of100submissions,63%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)223
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader