skip to main content
10.1145/3548636.3548638acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesitccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Surface Defect Detection method for vacuum gauges based on VAG-YOLO

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Vacuum gauges are the key equipment in vacuum inspection equipment, and the surface defects of vacuum gauges will directly affect the inspection performance and service life of vacuum inspection equipment. At present, the surface defect detection of vacuum gauges mainly relies on the visual inspection of workers, which is less efficient and accurate, and the workers are prone to misjudge the products due to subjective factors. To solve the problems of traditional manual inspection, this paper proposes an improved vacuum gauge surface defect detection method based on the YOLOv5s model called VAG-YOLO. we add a multi-scale adaptive fusion structure (MAF) to the YOLOv5s model to make full use of adaptive fusion of features at different scales to improve the detection performance of the network and increase the defect detection accuracy; Meanwhile, the transformer bottleneck structure (BoT) is introduced to combine multi head Self- Attention (MHSA) with convolutional neural network (CNN) to achieve the effect of reducing the number of network parameters and improving the detection speed. The experimental results show that the average detection accuracy of the VGA-YOLO model is 83.4%, which is higher and faster than the detection accuracy of various other algorithms, and can detect vacuum gauge surface defects in real time.

References

  1. Kim C W, Koivo A J. Hierarchical classification of surface defects on dusty wood boards[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 1994, 15(7): 713-721.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aghdam S R, Amid E, Imani M F. A fast method of steel surface defect detection using decision trees applied to LBP based features[C]//2012 7th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA). IEEE, 2012: 1447-1452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai X, Fang Y, Lin W, Saliency-based defect detection in industrial images by using phase spectrum[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2014, 10(4): 2135-2145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Choi D, Jeon Y, Yun J P, Pinhole detection in steel slab images using Gabor filter and morphological features[J]. Applied Optics, 2011, 50(26): 5122-5129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Wang H, Zhang J, Tian Y, A simple guidance template-based defect detection method for strip steel surfaces[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018, 15(5): 2798-2809.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tsanakas J A, Chrysostomou D, Botsaris P N, Fault diagnosis of photovoltaic modules through image processing and Canny edge detection on field thermographic measurements[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2015, 34(6): 351-372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Zhao Z, Gui K, Wang P. Fabric defect detection based on cascade faster R-CNN[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering. 2020: 1-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu B, Wang J. Detection of PCB surface defects with improved faster-RCNN and feature pyramid network[J]. Ieee Access, 2020, 8: 108335-108345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Li W, Dong T, Shi H, Defect detection algorithm of wire rope based on color segmentation and Faster RCNN[C]//2021 International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS). IEEE, 2021: 656-661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cui L, Jiang X, Xu M, SDDNet: a fast and accurate network for surface defect detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2021, 70: 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Yao Y, Wei S, Wang J. Surface Defect Detection of Aircraft Flared Duct Based on Improved YOLOv4 Algorithm[C]//2021 4th International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning. 2021: 26-32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Anwar N, Shen Z, Wei Q, YOLOv4 Based Deep Learning Algorithm for Defects Detection and Classification of Rail Surfaces[C]//2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). IEEE, 2021: 1616-1620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zheng L, Wang X, Wang Q, A Fabric Defect Detection Method Based on Improved YOLOv5[C]//2021 7th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC). IEEE, 2021: 620-624.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng Z, Guo L, Huang D, Electrical Insulator Defects Detection Method Based on YOLOv5[C]//2021 IEEE 10th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS). IEEE, 2021: 979-984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Xu Y, Zhang K, Wang L. Metal Surface Defect Detection Using Modified YOLO[J]. Algorithms, 2021, 14(9): 257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Zheng J, Han Q, Wang L, Lightweight Bimodal Rail Surface Defect Detection Method: Parallel-YOLOv4-Tiny[C]//2021 The 5th International Conference on Video and Image Processing. 2021: 98-103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Srinivas A, Lin T Y, Parmar N, Bottleneck transformers for visual recognition[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2021: 16519-16529.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu S, Huang D, Wang Y. Learning spatial fusion for single-shot object detection[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.09516, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Ssd: Single shot multibox detector[C]//European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham, 2016: 21-37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin T Y, Goyal P, Girshick R, Focal loss for dense object detection[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2017: 2980-2988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2015, 28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Surface Defect Detection method for vacuum gauges based on VAG-YOLO

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ITCC '22: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Communications
      June 2022
      138 pages
      ISBN:9781450396820
      DOI:10.1145/3548636

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 August 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format