skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585744acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

“This Could Be The Day I Die”: Unpacking Interpersonal and Systems Trust in a Local Sharing Economy Community

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The rapid development of the “sharing economy” enables the effective and efficient coordination, acquisition, distribution, and sharing of many kinds of different resources. Beyond the well-known sharing economy services such as Airbnb and Uber, an increasing number of local sharing initiatives have established online platforms and services to facilitate access to the shared resources within their local communities. With the automation and complexity of digital tools and platforms, and the specific challenges of online sharing communities, users’ trust and reliance become increasingly critical for successful use and adoption. In our qualitative study in collaboration with two industry partners (a local sharing community and a large infrastructure provider in Switzerland), we unpack various perspectives of interpersonal trust in the community and the systems trust of the supporting technologies. On this basis, we elicited a set of design opportunities for future platforms in the context of sharing economy.

Footnotes

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544549.3585744-video-preview.mp4

mp4

17.6 MB

3544549.3585744-talk-video.mp4

mp4

17.9 MB

References

  1. Susanne Bødker, Henrik Korsgaard, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2016. A Farmer, a Place and at least 20 Members- The Development of Artifact Ecologies in Volunteer-based Communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW ’16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1140–1154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820029Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Balázs Bodó. 2021. Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Media & Society 23, 9 (2021), 2668–2690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Rachel Botsman. 2017. Who can you trust?: how technology brought us together–and why it could drive us apart. Penguin UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Rachel Botsman and Roo Rogers. 2010. What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. Harper Collins, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. Thematic Analysis : A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd, London. http://digital.casalini.it/9781526417305 http://digital.casalini.it/5282292Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Coye Cheshire. 2011. Online Trust, Trustworthiness, or Assurance?Daedalus 140, 4 (2011), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Rajib Dey, Sayma Sultana, Afsaneh Razi, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2020. Exploring Smart Home Device Use by Airbnb Hosts. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382900Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Benjamin G. Edelman and Michael Luca. 2014. Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com. SSRN Electronic Journal (jan 2014). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2377353Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Anton Fedosov, Airi Lampinen, Tawanna R. Dillahunt, Ann Light, and Coye Cheshire. 2019. Cooperativism and Human-Computer Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’19. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3311751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Anton Fedosov, Airi Lampinen, William Odom, and Elaine M. Huang. 2021. A Dozen Stickers on a Mailbox: Physical Encounters and Digital Interactions in a Local Sharing Community. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3 (jan 2021), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432939Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Anton Fedosov, William Odom, Marc Langheinrich, and Ron Wakkary. 2018. Roaming Objects: Encoding Digital Histories of Use into Shared Objects and Tools. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 - DIS ’18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196722Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anton Fedosov, Ozge Subasi, Lisa Ochsenbein, and Elaine Huang. 2022. Supporting Designers in the Sharing Economy Through a Generative Design Cards Toolkit. In Creativity and Cognition. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3535203Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Koen Frenken and Juliet Schor. 2017. Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23 (2017), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mayo Fuster Morell, Ricard Espelt, and Melissa Renau Cano. 2020. Sustainable Platform Economy: Connections with the Sustainable Development Goals. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. David Gefen, Elena Karahanna, and Detmar W Straub. 2003. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS quarterly (2003), 51–90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. David Gefen and Detmar W Straub. 2004. Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega 32, 6 (2004), 407–424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Barney G Glaser and Anselm L Strauss. 2009. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Colin M. Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L. Toombs. 2018. The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Florian Hawlitschek, Timm Teubner, Marc Thomas Philipp Adam, Nils S Borchers, Mareike Moehlmann, and Christof Weinhardt. 2016. Trust in the sharing economy: An experimental framework. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Axel Hoffmann, Holger Hoffmann, and Matthias Söllner. 2013. Fostering initial trust in applications–developing and evaluating requirement patterns for application websites. In 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Patrick Gage Kelley, Joanna Bresee, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Robert W. Reeder. 2009. A "Nutrition Label" for Privacy. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (Mountain View, California, USA) (SOUPS ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1572532.1572538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Airi Lampinen and Barry Brown. 2017. Market Design for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 4331–4343. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025515Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Airi Lampinen, Vilma Lehtinen, Coye Cheshire, and Emmi Suhonen. 2013. Indebtedness, reciprocity, and fairness in local online exchange. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ’13. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 661. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441850Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Matthew V Law, Mor Naaman, and Nicola Dell. 2018. ShareBox: Designing A Physical System to Support Resource Exchange in Local Communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1155–1167. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196763Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Minha Lee, Lily Frank, and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2021. Brokerbot: A cryptocurrency chatbot in the social-technical gap of trust. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 30, 1 (2021), 79–117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Jan Marco Leimeister, Winfried Ebner, and Helmut Krcmar. 2005. Design, implementation, and evaluation of trust-supporting components in virtual communities for patients. Journal of Management Information Systems 21, 4 (2005), 101–131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jan Marco Leimeister, Pascal Sidiras, and Helmut Krcmar. 2006. Exploring success factors of virtual communities: The perspectives of members and operators. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce 16, 3-4 (2006), 279–300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ann Light. 2022. Trust in Collaborative Economies and How to Study It: Relational Assets and the Making of More-than-Strangers. Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies across Europe (2022), 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ann Light and Clodagh Miskelly. 2014. Design for sharing. Northumbria University/The Sustainable Society Network (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Carol Moser, Paul Resnick, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2017. Community Commerce: Facilitating Trust in Mom-to-Mom Sale Groups on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4344–4357. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025550Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Bonnie M Muir. 1987. Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International journal of man-machine studies 27, 5-6 (1987), 527–539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wolter Pieters. 2011. Explanation and trust: what to tell the user in security and AI?Ethics and information technology 13, 1 (2011), 53–64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Juliet Schor. 2016. Debating the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4, 3 (2016), 7–22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Aaron Sedley and Hendrik Müller. 2013. Minimizing Change Aversion for the Google Drive Launch. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI EA ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2351–2354. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468767Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Matthias Söllner, Axel Hoffmann, Holger Hoffmann, Arno Wacker, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2014. Understanding the formation of trust. In Socio-technical design of ubiquitous computing systems. Springer, 39–58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Maarten Ter Huurne, Amber Ronteltap, Rense Corten, and Vincent Buskens. 2017. Antecedents of trust in the sharing economy: A systematic review. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 16, 6 (2017), 485–498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Niels van Doorn. 2017. Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society 20, 6 (jun 2017), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. David Wachsmuth and Alexander Weisler. 2018. Airbnb and the rent gap: Gentrification through the sharing economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50, 6 (2018), 1147–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18778038Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Jeannette M. Wing. 2021. Trustworthy AI. Commun. ACM 64, 10 (sep 2021), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Liudmila Zavolokina, Noah Zani, and Gerhard Schwabe. 2020. Designing for trust in blockchain platforms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Jiang Zhu and Olivera Marjanovic. 2021. A Different Kind of Sharing Economy: A Literature Review of Platform Cooperatives. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2021 (HICSS-54). 4128–4137. https://aisel.aisnet.org/hicss-54/in/crowd-based_platforms/2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. “This Could Be The Day I Die”: Unpacking Interpersonal and Systems Trust in a Local Sharing Economy Community

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2023
      3914 pages
      ISBN:9781450394222
      DOI:10.1145/3544549

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format