ABSTRACT
The rapid development of the “sharing economy” enables the effective and efficient coordination, acquisition, distribution, and sharing of many kinds of different resources. Beyond the well-known sharing economy services such as Airbnb and Uber, an increasing number of local sharing initiatives have established online platforms and services to facilitate access to the shared resources within their local communities. With the automation and complexity of digital tools and platforms, and the specific challenges of online sharing communities, users’ trust and reliance become increasingly critical for successful use and adoption. In our qualitative study in collaboration with two industry partners (a local sharing community and a large infrastructure provider in Switzerland), we unpack various perspectives of interpersonal trust in the community and the systems trust of the supporting technologies. On this basis, we elicited a set of design opportunities for future platforms in the context of sharing economy.
Footnotes
Supplemental Material
- Susanne Bødker, Henrik Korsgaard, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2016. A Farmer, a Place and at least 20 Members- The Development of Artifact Ecologies in Volunteer-based Communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW ’16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1140–1154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820029Google ScholarDigital Library
- Balázs Bodó. 2021. Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Media & Society 23, 9 (2021), 2668–2690.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rachel Botsman. 2017. Who can you trust?: how technology brought us together–and why it could drive us apart. Penguin UK.Google Scholar
- Rachel Botsman and Roo Rogers. 2010. What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. Thematic Analysis : A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd, London. http://digital.casalini.it/9781526417305 http://digital.casalini.it/5282292Google Scholar
- Coye Cheshire. 2011. Online Trust, Trustworthiness, or Assurance?Daedalus 140, 4 (2011), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00114Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rajib Dey, Sayma Sultana, Afsaneh Razi, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2020. Exploring Smart Home Device Use by Airbnb Hosts. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382900Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin G. Edelman and Michael Luca. 2014. Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com. SSRN Electronic Journal (jan 2014). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2377353Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anton Fedosov, Airi Lampinen, Tawanna R. Dillahunt, Ann Light, and Coye Cheshire. 2019. Cooperativism and Human-Computer Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’19. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3311751Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anton Fedosov, Airi Lampinen, William Odom, and Elaine M. Huang. 2021. A Dozen Stickers on a Mailbox: Physical Encounters and Digital Interactions in a Local Sharing Community. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3 (jan 2021), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432939Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anton Fedosov, William Odom, Marc Langheinrich, and Ron Wakkary. 2018. Roaming Objects: Encoding Digital Histories of Use into Shared Objects and Tools. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 - DIS ’18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196722Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anton Fedosov, Ozge Subasi, Lisa Ochsenbein, and Elaine Huang. 2022. Supporting Designers in the Sharing Economy Through a Generative Design Cards Toolkit. In Creativity and Cognition. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3535203Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koen Frenken and Juliet Schor. 2017. Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23 (2017), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mayo Fuster Morell, Ricard Espelt, and Melissa Renau Cano. 2020. Sustainable Platform Economy: Connections with the Sustainable Development Goals. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187640Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Gefen, Elena Karahanna, and Detmar W Straub. 2003. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS quarterly (2003), 51–90.Google Scholar
- David Gefen and Detmar W Straub. 2004. Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega 32, 6 (2004), 407–424.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barney G Glaser and Anselm L Strauss. 2009. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Colin M. Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L. Toombs. 2018. The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108Google ScholarDigital Library
- Florian Hawlitschek, Timm Teubner, Marc Thomas Philipp Adam, Nils S Borchers, Mareike Moehlmann, and Christof Weinhardt. 2016. Trust in the sharing economy: An experimental framework. (2016).Google Scholar
- Axel Hoffmann, Holger Hoffmann, and Matthias Söllner. 2013. Fostering initial trust in applications–developing and evaluating requirement patterns for application websites. In 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Patrick Gage Kelley, Joanna Bresee, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Robert W. Reeder. 2009. A "Nutrition Label" for Privacy. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (Mountain View, California, USA) (SOUPS ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1572532.1572538Google ScholarDigital Library
- Airi Lampinen and Barry Brown. 2017. Market Design for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 4331–4343. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025515Google ScholarDigital Library
- Airi Lampinen, Vilma Lehtinen, Coye Cheshire, and Emmi Suhonen. 2013. Indebtedness, reciprocity, and fairness in local online exchange. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ’13. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 661. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441850Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew V Law, Mor Naaman, and Nicola Dell. 2018. ShareBox: Designing A Physical System to Support Resource Exchange in Local Communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1155–1167. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196763Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minha Lee, Lily Frank, and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2021. Brokerbot: A cryptocurrency chatbot in the social-technical gap of trust. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 30, 1 (2021), 79–117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jan Marco Leimeister, Winfried Ebner, and Helmut Krcmar. 2005. Design, implementation, and evaluation of trust-supporting components in virtual communities for patients. Journal of Management Information Systems 21, 4 (2005), 101–131.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jan Marco Leimeister, Pascal Sidiras, and Helmut Krcmar. 2006. Exploring success factors of virtual communities: The perspectives of members and operators. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce 16, 3-4 (2006), 279–300.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ann Light. 2022. Trust in Collaborative Economies and How to Study It: Relational Assets and the Making of More-than-Strangers. Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies across Europe (2022), 13.Google Scholar
- Ann Light and Clodagh Miskelly. 2014. Design for sharing. Northumbria University/The Sustainable Society Network (2014).Google Scholar
- Carol Moser, Paul Resnick, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2017. Community Commerce: Facilitating Trust in Mom-to-Mom Sale Groups on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4344–4357. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025550Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bonnie M Muir. 1987. Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International journal of man-machine studies 27, 5-6 (1987), 527–539.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wolter Pieters. 2011. Explanation and trust: what to tell the user in security and AI?Ethics and information technology 13, 1 (2011), 53–64.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juliet Schor. 2016. Debating the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4, 3 (2016), 7–22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aaron Sedley and Hendrik Müller. 2013. Minimizing Change Aversion for the Google Drive Launch. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI EA ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2351–2354. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468767Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthias Söllner, Axel Hoffmann, Holger Hoffmann, Arno Wacker, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2014. Understanding the formation of trust. In Socio-technical design of ubiquitous computing systems. Springer, 39–58.Google Scholar
- Maarten Ter Huurne, Amber Ronteltap, Rense Corten, and Vincent Buskens. 2017. Antecedents of trust in the sharing economy: A systematic review. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 16, 6 (2017), 485–498.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Niels van Doorn. 2017. Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society 20, 6 (jun 2017), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Wachsmuth and Alexander Weisler. 2018. Airbnb and the rent gap: Gentrification through the sharing economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50, 6 (2018), 1147–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18778038Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeannette M. Wing. 2021. Trustworthy AI. Commun. ACM 64, 10 (sep 2021), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448248Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liudmila Zavolokina, Noah Zani, and Gerhard Schwabe. 2020. Designing for trust in blockchain platforms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (2020).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jiang Zhu and Olivera Marjanovic. 2021. A Different Kind of Sharing Economy: A Literature Review of Platform Cooperatives. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2021 (HICSS-54). 4128–4137. https://aisel.aisnet.org/hicss-54/in/crowd-based_platforms/2Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- “This Could Be The Day I Die”: Unpacking Interpersonal and Systems Trust in a Local Sharing Economy Community
Recommendations
Does Technology Trust Substitute Interpersonal Trust?: Examining Technology Trust's Influence on Individual Decision-Making
While an increasing number of trust studies examine technological artifacts as trust recipients, there is still a lack of basic understanding of how technology trust relates to traditional trust and its role within the broader nomological net ...
Sharing Economy for Sustainable Commerce
The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate what factors that affect consumers' adoption intention of sharing economy in the tourism industry from the perspective of social learning theory. By presenting the concept of consumers' self-...
How Do Institution-Based Trust and Interpersonal Trust Affect Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing?
There are two typical forms of trust in organisational settings-institution-based trust and interpersonal trust. The role of interpersonal trust in promoting interdepartmental knowledge sharing has been investigated. The effect of institution-based ...
Comments