skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585735acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

The Time is Ticking: The Effect of Limited Time Discounts on Consumers’ Buying Behavior and Experience

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Deceptive countdown timers indicate a limited-time offer that is not truly limited-time, as the deal continues after the timer reaches zero. The effects of such deceptive (dark) patterns on consumers’ buying behavior are largely unknown. We present a setup to research such effects and use it in this exploratory study to investigate deceptive countdown timers through a simulated online shopping task (N=245), followed by a questionnaire. We compared the reaction of participants who encountered i) no special offers, ii) only a discount, and iii) a discount accompanied by a deceptive countdown timer. The results show that both types of discounts increase customers’ preference for the discounted product. However, we observe various negative responses towards deceptive timers (e.g., they are perceived as manipulative, immoral, and unethical). Our findings indicate that deceptive timers can induce a fear of missing out and make consumers averse to offers and websites that use such practices.

Footnotes

  1. 1 Throughout the paper, we will use the term ‘deceptive design patterns’ as this is the most recent term. However, when referring to the experiment and questionnaire, we use ‘dark patterns’ as this term was used in the experiment.

    Footnote
  2. 2 The approval rate (0 – 100) is the percentage of studies for which the participant has been approved, versus the number of experiments participated in [43].

    Footnote
Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544549.3585735-talk-video.mp4

mp4

73.6 MB

3544549.3585735-video-preview.mp4

mp4

20.6 MB

References

  1. Praveen Aggarwal and Rajiv Vaidyanathan. 2015. Use it or lose it: Time-limited promotions and purchase behavior. In Proceedings of the 2002 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Springer, 2–2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Miglena Amirpur and Alexander Benlian. 2015. Buying under pressure: Purchase pressure cues and their effects on online buying decisions. In Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems. 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ATLAS.ti. 2021. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH [ATLAS.ti 9 Windows]. https://atlasti.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. James R Bettman, Mary Frances Luce, and John W Payne. 1998. Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of consumer research 25, 3 (1998), 187–217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kerstin Bongard-Blanchy, Arianna Rossi, Salvador Rivas, Sophie Doublet, Vincent Koenig, and Gabriele Lenzini. 2021. ” I am Definitely Manipulated, Even When I am Aware of it. It’s Ridiculous!”-Dark Patterns from the End-User Perspective. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 763–776.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Pedro Bordalo, Nicola Gennaioli, and Andrei Shleifer. 2013. Salience and consumer choice. Journal of Political Economy 121, 5 (2013), 803–843.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Christoph Bösch, Benjamin Erb, Frank Kargl, Henning Kopp, and Stefan Pfattheicher. 2016. Tales from the dark side: privacy dark strategies and privacy dark patterns.Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. 2016, 4 (2016), 237–254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Harry Brignull.. Dark Patterns - User Interfaces Designed to Trick People. https://www.darkpatterns.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Michelle Childs and Byoungho Ellie Jin. 2020. Retailer-brand collaborations: testing key strategies to increase consumers’ urgency to buy. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hsuan-Yi Chou. 2019. Units of time do matter: How countdown time units affect consumers’ intentions to participate in group-buying offers. Electronic commerce research and applications 35 (2019), 100839.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregory Conti and Edward Sobiesk. 2010. Malicious interface design: Exploiting the user. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’10. 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772719Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Linda Di Geronimo, Larissa Braz, Enrico Fregnan, Fabio Palomba, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2020. UI Dark Patterns and Where to Find Them: A Study on Mobile Applications and User Perception. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376600Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Anne Edland and Ola Svenson. 1993. Judgment and Decision Making Under Time Pressure. In Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making. Springer US, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6846-6_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Maik Eisenbeiss, Robert Wilken, Bernd Skiera, and Markus Cornelissen. 2015. What makes deal-of-the-day promotions really effective? The interplay of discount and time constraint with product type. International Journal of Research in Marketing 32, 4 (dec 2015), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.05.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Edgar Erdfelder, Franz FAul, Axel Buchner, and Albert Georg Lang. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 41, 4 (2009), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert Georg Lang, and Axel Buchner. 2007. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. In Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 39. Psychonomic Society Inc., 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Forbrukerrådet. 2018. Deceived By Design. https://fil.forbrukerradet.no/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2018-06-27-deceived-by-design-final.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lothar Fritsch. 2017. Privacy dark patterns in identity management. In Open Identity Summit 2017. 93–104. http://www.diva-portal.orghttp//urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-63722Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Xin Ge, Paul R. Messinger, and Jin Li. 2009. Influence of Soldout Products on Consumer Choice. Journal of Retailing 85, 3 (sep 2009), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETAI.2009.05.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jorrit Geels. 2021. Interactive friction in consent forms. Bachelor’s Thesis. Radboud University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sandra Godinho, Marília Prada, and Margarida Vaz Garrido. 2016. Under Pressure: An Integrative Perspective of Time Pressure Impact on Consumer Decision-Making., 251–273 pages. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1148654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Paul Graßl, Hanna Schraffenberger, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, and Moniek Buijzen. 2021. Dark and Bright Patterns in Cookie Consent Requests. Journal of Digital Social Research 3, 1 (2021), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v3i1.54Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Colin M. Gray, Jingle Chen, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, and Liyang Qu. 2021. End User Accounts of Dark Patterns as Felt Manipulation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3479516 arxiv:2010.11046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Colin M Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L Toombs. 2018. The dark (patterns) side of UX design. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Vol. 2018-April. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Colin M Gray, Cristiana Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Michael Toth, and Damian Cliford. 2021. Dark patterns and the legal requirements of consent banners: An interaction criticism perspective. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445779 arxiv:2009.10194Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Saul Greenberg, Sebastian Boring, Jo Vermeulen, and Jakub Dostal. 2014. Dark patterns in proxemic interactions: A critical perspective. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS. Association for Computing Machinery, 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598541Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Shipra Gupta. 2013. The Psychological Effects of Perceived Scarcity on Consumers ’ Buying Behavior. Marketing Theory 5, 15 (2013), 423–441.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Richard C. Hanna, Scott D. Swain, and Paul D. Berger. 2016. Optimizing time-limited price promotions. Journal of Marketing Analytics 4, 2-3 (jul 2016), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-016-0006-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. J Jeffrey Inman, Anil C Peter, and Priya Raghubir. 1997. Framing the deal: The role of restrictions in accentuating deal value. Journal of Consumer Research 24, 1 (1997), 68–79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Georgios Kampanos and Siamak F. Shahandashti. 2021. Accept All: The Landscape of Cookie Banners in Greece and the UK. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 625 (apr 2021), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78120-0_14 arxiv:2104.05750Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Hyuksoo Kim, Jee Young Chung, and Michael Lee. 2020. Consumer’s response to time restrictions: role of construal level. Journal of Marketing Communications 26, 2 (2020), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2018.1522508Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Jeeyoon Kim, Younghan Lee, and Mi Lyang Kim. 2020. Investigating ’Fear of Missing Out’ (FOMO) as an extrinsic motive affecting sport event consumer’s behavioral intention and FOMO-driven consumption’s influence on intrinsic rewards, extrinsic rewards, and consumer satisfaction. PLoS ONE 15, 12 December (dec 2020), e0243744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243744Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Cherie Lacey and Catherine Caudwell. 2019. Cuteness as a ’Dark Pattern’ in Home Robots. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 2019-March. IEEE Computer Society, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673274Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Laerd Statistics.. SPSS Statistics Tutorials and Statistical Guides | Laerd Statistics. https://statistics.laerd.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Chris Lewis. 2014. Irresistible Apps. Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-6422-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Jamie Luguri and Lior Jacob Strahilevitz. 2021. Shining a light on dark patterns., 43–109 pages. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaa006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Arunesh Mathur, Gunes Acar, Michael Friedman, Elena Lucherini, Jonathan R. Mayer, Marshini Chetty, and Arvind Narayanan. 2019. Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websites., 81:1–81:32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359183Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Thomas Mildner and Gian Luca Savino. 2021. Ethical User Interfaces: Exploring the Effects of Dark Patterns on Facebook. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451659Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Norwegian Consumer Council. 2022. Enough deception!https://storage.forbrukerradet.no/media/2022/11/report-enough-deception.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Midas Nouwens, Ilaria Liccardi, Michael Veale, David Karger, and Lalana Kagal. 2020. Dark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop-ups and Demonstrating their Influence. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376321 arxiv:2001.02479Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lisa Ordóñez and Lehman Benson. 1997. Decisions under time pressure: How time constraint affects risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71, 2 (aug 1997), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2717Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Şebnem Özdemir. 2020. Digital nudges and dark patterns: The angels and the archfiends of digital communication., 417–428 pages. https://doi.org/10.1093/LLC/FQZ014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Prolific.. Quickly find research participants you can trust. https://www.prolific.co/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Andrew K. Przybylski, Kou Murayama, Cody R. Dehaan, and Valerie Gladwell. 2013. Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 4 (jul 2013), 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. PublicWWW.. Search Engine for Source Code - PublicWWW.com. https://publicwww.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Than Htut Soe, Oda Elise Nordberg, Frode Guribye, and Marija Slavkovik. 2020. Circumvention by design - Dark patterns in cookie consent for online news outlets. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420132 arxiv:2006.13985Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Robert Sugden, Mengjie Wang, and Daniel John Zizzo. 2019. Take it or leave it: Experimental evidence on the effect of time-limited offers on consumer behaviour. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 168 (2019), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.09.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Ola Svenson and Anne Edland. 1987. Change of preferences under time pressure: Choices and judgements. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 28, 4 (1987), 322–330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Richard Thaler. 1980. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1, 1 (1980), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Jelmer Tiemessen. 2021. The Time is Ticking: The Effect of Deceptive Countdown Timers on Consumers’ Buying Behavior and Experience. Master’s thesis. Radboud University. https://www.ru.nl/publish/pages/769526/jelmer_tiemessen.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Michael Trice and Liza Potts. 2018. Building Dark Patterns into Platforms: How GamerGate Perturbed Twitter’s User Experience – Present Tense. Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society 6, 3 (2018), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. W3Layouts. 2018. Electro Store an Ecommerce Theme Bootstrap Template » W3Layouts. https://w3layouts.com/template/electro-store-an-ecommerce-theme-bootstrap-template/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Ben Wagner, Krisztina Rozgonyi, Marie Therese Sekwenz, Jennifer Cobbe, and Jatinder Singh. 2020. Regulating transparency? Facebook, twitter and the German network enforcement act. In FAT* 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372856Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Wappalyzer.. Find out what websites are built with - Wappalyzer. https://www.wappalyzer.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. José P. Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. 2013. Dark patterns in the design of games. (2013), 39–46. http://www.fdg2013.org/program/papers/paper06_zagal_etal.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhuofan Zhang, Fernando R. Jiménez, and John E. Cicala. 2020. Fear Of Missing Out Scale: A self-concept perspective. Psychology and Marketing 37, 11 (nov 2020), 1619–1634. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21406Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Zhanbo Zhao, Fan Liang, and Xiaoming Zhu. 2019. Effect of product type and time pressure on consumers’ online impulse buying intention. Journal of Contemporary 2, 2 (2019), 137–154. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JCMARS-01-2019-0012/full/htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Time is Ticking: The Effect of Limited Time Discounts on Consumers’ Buying Behavior and Experience

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2023
        3914 pages
        ISBN:9781450394222
        DOI:10.1145/3544549

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 April 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Work in Progress
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format