ABSTRACT
Backscatter communication enables miniature, batteryless, and low-cost wireless sensors. Since electromagnetic waves are strongly attenuated in several scenarios, backscatter communication in metals via acoustic waves can leverage various applications, e. g., in structural health monitoring. When backscattering, the Tag has little control over the modulation it performs on the carrier wave. Therefore, existing approaches commonly employ differential binary modulation schemes, limiting the achievable data rates. To overcome this limitation, we derive a channel model that accurately describes the modulation in an acoustic backscatter channel---as, e. g., found in steel beams---and leverage it to achieve higher-order load modulation. We present an open-source Reader and Tag pair prototype based on COTS components that we have developed for communication and on-the-fly channel characterization. We explore the influence of various parameters on communication performance on different channels. Moreover, (i) we are the first to demonstrate that acoustic backscatter is feasible in guided-wave channels, covering up to 3 meters, and that (ii) our modulation scheme achieves up to 211% higher data rates than binary modulation schemes, and (iii) provides reliable communication through channel coding.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental material.
- Sayed Saad Afzal, Reza Ghaffarivardavagh, Waleed Akbar, Osvy Rodriguez, and Fadel Adib. 2020. Enabling Higher-Order Modulation for Underwater Backscatter Communication. In Global Oceans 2020: Singapore-US Gulf Coast. IEEE.Google Scholar
- J. M. Algueta-Migue, J. R. Garcí a Oya, A. J. LÓpez-Martin, C. A. De La Cruz Blas, F. Muñoz Chavero, and E. Hidalgo-Fort. 2019. Low-Power Ultrasonic Front-End for Cargo Container Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (2019), 1--1.Google Scholar
- Ahmed Allam. 2021. Acoustic Power Transfer Leveraging Piezoelectricity and Metamaterials. Ph.D. Dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/65095Google Scholar
- Jonathan D. Ashdown, Kyle R. Wilt, Tristan J. Lawry, Gary J. Saulnier, David A. Shoudy, Henry A. Scarton, and Andrew J. Gavens. 2013. A full-duplex ultrasonic through-wall communication and power delivery system. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 60, 3 (March 2013), 587--595.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Bacher, P. Palensky, and S. Mahlknecht. 2005. Low cost data transmission via metallic solids for sensor networking. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies, 2005. 193--198.Google Scholar
- J. Bok and H. Ryu. 2012. Mitigation of multipath in steel wall channel of ultrasonic communication system. In 2012 International Conference on ICT Convergence (ICTC). 449--453.Google Scholar
- Michael T Cunningham, Gary J Saulnier, Robert Chase, Edward M Curt, Kyle R Wilt, Francisco J Maldonado, Stephen Oonk, and Henry A Scarton. 2016. Low-rate ultrasonic communications and power delivery for sensor applications. In MILCOM 2016-2016 IEEE Military Communications Conference. IEEE, 91--96.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Falko Dressler and Stefan Fischer. 2015. Connecting in-body nano communication with body area networks: Challenges and opportunities of the Internet of Nano Things. Nano Communication Networks 6, 2 (2015), 29--38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reza Ghaffarivardavagh, Sayed Saad Afzal, Osvy Rodriguez, and Fadel Adib. 2020. Ultra-Wideband Underwater Backscatter via Piezoelectric Metamaterials (SIGCOMM '20). ACM, 722--734.Google Scholar
- Mohammad Meraj Ghanbari and Rikky Muller. 2020. Optimizing Volumetric Efficiency and Backscatter Communication in Biosensing Ultrasonic Implants. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 14, 6 (Dec. 2020), 1381--1392. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.Google Scholar
- D. J. Graham, J. A. Neasham, and B. S. Sharif. 2011. Investigation of Methods for Data Communication and Power Delivery Through Metals. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 58, 10 (Oct. 2011), 4972--4980.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raffaele Guida, Neil Dave, Francesco Restuccia, Emrecan Demirors, and Tommaso Melodia. 2019. U-Verse: a miniaturized platform for end-to-end closed-loop implantable internet of medical things systems. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 311--323.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexander Heifetz, Jafar Saniie, Xin Huang, Boyang Wang, Dmitry Shribak, Eugene R Koehl, Sasan Bakhtiari, and Richard B Vilim. 2019. Final Report for Transmission of Information by Acoustic Communication Along Metal Pathways in Nuclear Facilities. Technical Report. Argonne National Lab.(ANL), Argonne, IL (United States).Google Scholar
- Michael Helmling, Stefan Scholl, Florian Gensheimer, Tobias Dietz, Kira Kraft, Stefan Ruzika, and Norbert Wehn. 2019. Database of Channel Codes and ML Simulation Results. www.uni-kl.de/channel-codes. (2019).Google Scholar
- Thomas Hosman, Mark Yeary, John K Antonio, and Brent Hobbs. 2010. Multi-tone FSK for ultrasonic communication. In 2010 IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings. IEEE, 1424--1429.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Huang, J. Saniie, S. Bakhtiari, and A. Heifetz. 2018. Applying EMAT for Ultrasonic Communication Through Steel Plates and Pipes. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT). 0379--0383.Google Scholar
- Junsu Jang and Fadel Adib. 2019. Underwater backscatter networking. In Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication. 187--199.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marina Jordão, Ricardo Correia, and Nuno Borges Carvalho. 2019. Characterisation and implementation of high-order backscatter modulation for IoT applications. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 13, 15 (2019), 2636--2640.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ME Kiziroglou, DE Boyle, SW Wright, and EM Yeatman. 2017. Acoustic power delivery to pipeline monitoring wireless sensors. Ultrasonics 77 (2017), 54--60.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Kluge, Th. Becker, J. Schalk, and T. Otterpohl. 2008. Remote acoustic powering and data transmission for sensors inside of conductive envelopes. In 2008 IEEE SENSORS. 41--44. ISSN: 1930-0395.Google Scholar
- Hartmudt Koeppe, Sven Thamm, Thomas Trettin, Ulrike Steinmann, and Joerg Auge. 2014. A wireless supplied multi-sensor-system for spatial resolved inline process analysis. In Sensors and Measuring Systems 2014; 17. ITG/GMA Symposium. 1--5.Google Scholar
- Yao-Hong Liu, Christian Bachmann, Xiaoyan Wang, Yan Zhang, Ao Ba, Benjamin Busze, Ming Ding, Pieter Harpe, Gert-Jan van Schaik, Georgios Selimis, Hans Giesen, Jordy Gloudemans, Adnane Sbai, Li Huang, Hiromu Kato, Guido Dolmans, Kathleen Philips, and Harmke de Groot. 2015. 13.2 A 3.7mW-RX 4.4mW-TX fully integrated Bluetooth Low-Energy/IEEE802.15.4/proprietary SoC with an ADPLL-based fast frequency offset compensation in 40nm CMOS. In 2015 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC) Digest of Technical Papers. 1--3. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter Oppermann and Christian Renner. 2019. Low-Power Ultrasonic Wake-Up and Communication through Structural Elements. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Energy Harvesting & Energy-Neutral Sensing Systems (ENSsys'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Enrico Paolini and Mark Flanagan. 2014. Low-Density Parity-Check Code Constructions. In Channel Coding, David Declerq, Marc Fossorier, and Ezio Biglieri (Eds.). Academic Press, Oxford, 141--209.Google Scholar
- Dominique Paret. 2009. RFID at ultra and super high frequencies. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bernd-Christian Renner, Jan Heitmann, and Fabian Steinmetz. 2020. ahoi: Inexpensive, Low-power Communication and Localization for Underwater Sensor Networks and μAUVs. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) 16, 2 (2020), 1--46.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard Primerano, Moshe Kam, and Kapil Dandekar. 2009. High bit rate ultrasonic communication through metal channels. In 2009 43rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems. 902--906.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sebastian Roa-Prada, Henry A. Scarton, Gary J. Saulnier, David A. Shoudy, Jonathan D. Ashdown, Pankaj K. Das, and Andrew J. Gavens. 2013. An Ultrasonic Through-Wall Communication (UTWC) System Model. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 135, 1 (02 2013).Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. G. L. Roes. 2015. Exploring the potential of acoustic energy transfer. Ph.D. Dissertation. TU Eindhoven. https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/exploring-the-potential-of-acoustic-energy-transferGoogle Scholar
- G. J. Saulnier, H. A. Scarton, A. J. Gavens, D. A. Shoudy, S. Bard, S. Roa-Prada, T. L. Murphy, M. Wetzel, and P. Das. 2006. Through-Wall Communicatin of Low-Rate Digital Data Using Ultrasound. Technical Report LM-06K102. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL), Niskayuna, NY.Google Scholar
- D. A. Shoudy, G. J. Saulnier, H. A. Scarton, P. K. Das, S. Roa-Prada, J. D. Ashdown, and A. J. Gavens. 2007. P3F-5 An Ultrasonic Through-Wall Communication System with Power Harvesting. In 2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. 1848--1853.Google Scholar
- Zhongqing Su. 2009. Identification of Damage Using Lamb Waves. Springer London.Google Scholar
- Stewart J. Thomas and Matthew S. Reynolds. 2012. A 96 Mbit/sec, 15.5 pJ/bit 16-QAM modulator for UHF backscatter communication. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on RFID (RFID). 185--190.Google Scholar
- Victor Farm-Guoo Tseng, Sarah S. Bedair, and Nathan Lazarus. 2018. Acoustic Power Transfer and Communication With a Wireless Sensor Embedded Within Metal. IEEE Sensors Journal 18, 13 (July 2018), 5550--5558. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Victor Farm-Guoo Tseng, Sarah S. Bedair, Joshua J. Radice, Trevon E. Drummond, and Nathan Lazarus. 2020. Ultrasonic Lamb Waves for Wireless Power Transfer. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 67, 3 (March 2020), 664--670. Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Yang and A. C. Singer. 2016. Energy Efficient Ultrasonic Communication on Steel Pipes. In 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (SiPS). 297--302.Google Scholar
- Lonzhi Yuan, Can Xiong, Si Chen, and Wei Gong. 2021. Embracing Self-Powered Wireless Wearables for Smart Healthcare. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). 1--7. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jianing Zhang, Ziying Yu, Hengxu Yang, Ming Wu, and Jun Yang. 2015. Wireless communication using ultrasound through metal barriers: Experiment and analysis. In 2015 10th International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS). 1--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Higher-order modulation for acoustic backscatter communication in metals
Recommendations
Equalization for High-Bitrate Acoustic Backscatter Communication in Metals
EWSN '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and NetworksAcoustic backscatter communication allows sensors in challenging environments to transmit data with negligible energy cost and is especially useful where electromagnetic waves are infeasible. In acoustic channels, strong intersymbol interference (ISI) ...
Backscatter-Modulation Constellation for Full-Duplex Wireless Communication
MASS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS)In this paper, we consider two nodes that wish to communicate through wireless channels simultaneously at the same frequency. Our concept is based on backscatter modulation (BM), where electromagnetic waves are modulated and reflected by the same ...
Ambient Backscatter Communication Systems With MFSK Modulation
The ambient backscatter communication is a newly rising paradigm for the Internet-of-Things networks, which enables the connection of low-cost devices. This paper proposes a novel MFSK modulation for the Tag of ambient backscatter communications systems,...
Comments