skip to main content
10.1145/3544109.3544310acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesipecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis and Simulations of the Rock-Paper-Scissors Game with Environmental Feedback

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The classic Rock-Paper-Scissors (RPS) game has the only internal Nash Equilibrium (NE), which is not an Evolutionary Stable Strategy (ESS). Based on the replicator dynamics of evolutionary game theory, this paper considering the new RPS game that players have mutual feedback with environment, establishes a three-dimensional ordinary differential equation system. Through analysis and numerical simulations of this system, we prove the new RPS game has an ESS when the initial environment is not depleted and find three evolutionary internals including Evolutionary Equilibrium (EE) and periodic solutions.

References

  1. N. Kumar, K. Kaur, A. Jindal, and J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, “Providing healthcare services on-the-fly using multi-player cooperation game theory in Internet of Vehicles (IoV) environment,” Digital Communications and Networks, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 191-203, 2015/08/01/, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. X. Wang, Z. Zheng, and F. Fu, “Steering eco-evolutionary game dynamics with manifold control,” Proc Math Phys Eng Sci, vol. 476, no. 2233, pp. 20190643, Jan, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. F. F. Xin Wang, “Eco-evolutionary dynamics with environmental feedback: Cooperation in a changing world,” A Letters journal exploring the frontiers of physics, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. Vemprala, N. Gudigantala, and R. Chaganti, Debunking Misinformation Using a Game Theoretic Approach, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. N. Chowdhury, S. Kundu, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh, “Complex evolutionary dynamics due to punishment and free space in ecological multigames,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 477, no. 2252, pp. 20210397, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. S. Brown, “Why Darwin would have loved evolutionary game theory,” Proc Biol Sci, vol. 283, no. 1838, pp. 20160847, Sep 14, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. S. Weitz, C. Eksin, K. Paarporn, S. P. Brown, and W. C. Ratcliff, “An oscillating tragedy of the commons in replicator dynamics with game-environment feedback,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 113, no. 47, pp. E7518-E7525, Nov 22, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. Mathias, A. Srinivas, and H. S. William, “Large deviations and Stochastic stability in Population Games,” vol. 0, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Kostadimas, K. Kastampolidou, and T. J. A. Andronikos, “Correlation of biological and computer viruses through evolutionary game theory,” vol. abs/2108.00508, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. B. Wu, T. Yuan, Y. Qi, and M. Dong, “Public Opinion Dissemination with Incomplete Information on Social Network: A Study Based on the Infectious Diseases Model and Game Theory,” Complex System Modeling and Simulation, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 109-121, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. V. S. Nikitina, “Behavioral modelling of subjects in legal cases-games with imperfect rationality,” SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 118, pp. 01011, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Ma, B. Zhang, S. Cao, J. S. Liu, and W.-X. Wang, “Limited memory optimizes cooperation in social dilemma experiments,” Royal Society Open Science, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 210653, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Z. Wang, B. Xu, and H. J. Zhou, “Social cycling and conditional responses in the Rock-Paper-Scissors game,” Sci Rep, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5830, Jul 25, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. H.-J. Zhou, “The rock–paper–scissors game,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 151-163, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. T. Nagatani, and G. Ichinose, “Diffusively-Coupled Rock-Paper-Scissors Game with Mutation in Scale-Free Hierarchical Networks,” Complexity, vol. 2020, pp. 1-8, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. Nagatani, G. Ichinose, and K. I. Tainaka, “Heterogeneous network promotes species coexistence: metapopulation model for rock-paper-scissors game,” Sci Rep, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7094, May 4, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Hoffman, S. Suetens, U. Gneezy, and M. A. Nowak, “An experimental investigation of evolutionary dynamics in the Rock-Paper-Scissors game,” Sci Rep, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8817, Mar 6, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. H. Liu, X. Wang, L. Liu, and Z. Li, “Co-evolutionary Game Dynamics of Competitive Cognitions and Public Opinion Environment,” Frontiers in Physics, vol. 9, no. 148, 2021-May-11, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Lion, “Theoretical Approaches in Evolutionary Ecology: Environmental Feedback as a Unifying Perspective,” Am Nat, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 21-44, Jan, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. C. Hauert, C. Saade, and A. McAvoy, “Asymmetric evolutionary games with environmental feedback,” J Theor Biol, vol. 462, pp. 347-360, Feb 7, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. F. Toupo, S. H. Strogatz, J. D. Cohen, and D. G. Rand, “Evolutionary game dynamics of controlled and automatic decision-making,” Chaos, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 073120, Jul, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. E. Akcay, “Deconstructing Evolutionary Game Theory: Coevolution of Social Behaviors with Their Evolutionary Setting,” Am Nat, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 315-330, Feb, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IPEC '22: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers
    April 2022
    1065 pages
    ISBN:9781450395786
    DOI:10.1145/3544109

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format