skip to main content
10.1145/3539494.3542753acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A multi-sensor deep learning approach for complex daily living activity recognition

Published:27 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the ever increasing elderly population, human activity trackers can help monitor the daily physical activities performed by the elderly in order to contribute towards improvements in independent living and quality of life.

Little activity recognition research has explored the use of multiple Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) to capture both simple and complex human activities. Therefore, existing research may not benefit the monitoring of the elderly population wherein the complexity in the details of changes are not captured. This work proposes a multi-sensor approach measuring acceleration and quaternion values to recognise both simple and complex daily living activities using a deep learning approach. We compare and evaluate the performance of using 1, 3 and 5 on-body IMU sensors to train CNN and LSTM networks with both acceleration and quaternion values. The results show that the adoption of the quaternion values from 5 on-body sensors using the LSTM model outperforms all other models (F1-score=0.9606). This high performance provides many opportunities for the accurate monitoring of complex daily living activities.

References

  1. Shamir Alavi, Dennis Arsenault, and Anthony Whitehead. 2016. Quaternion-Based Gesture Recognition Using Wireless Wearable Motion Capture Sensors. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 16, 5 (5 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Vidya Balu and Sasikumar P. 2022. Wearable Multi-Sensor Data Fusion Approach for Human Activity Recognition Using Machine Learning Algorithms. SSRN Electronic Journal (2 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. S. Bucks, D. L. Ashworth, G. K. Wilcock, and K. Siegfried. 1996. Assessment of activities of daily living in dementia: development of the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale. Age and ageing 25, 2 (1996), 113--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lei Gao, Alan K. Bourke, and John Nelson. 2011. A system for activity recognition using multi-sensor fusion. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. IEEE, Boston, MA, USA, 7869--7872.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lei Gao, A. K. Bourke, and John Nelson. 2014. Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems. Medical Engineering & Physics 36, 6 (6 2014), 779--785.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lei Gao, A. K. Bourke, and John Nelson. 2014. Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems. Medical Engineering and Physics 36, 6 (2014), 779--785.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mohammed Mehedi Hassan, Md Zia Uddin, Amr Mohamed, and Ahmad Almogren. 2018. A robust human activity recognition system using smartphone sensors and deep learning. Future Generation Computer Systems 81 (4 2018), 307--313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation 9, 8 (11 1997), 1735--1780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sebastian O.H. Madgwick, Andrew J.L. Harrison, and Ravi Vaidyanathan. 2011. Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sakorn Mekruksavanich and Anuchit Jitpattanakul. 2021. Deep Convolutional Neural Network with RNNs for Complex Activity Recognition Using Wrist-Worn Wearable Sensor Data. Electronics 2021, Vol. 10, Page 1685 10, 14 (7 2021), 1685.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Zoran Milanović, Saša Pantelić, Nebojša Trajković, Goran Sporiš, Radmila Kostić, and Nic James. 2013. Age-related decrease in physical activity and functional fitness among elderly men and women. Clinical interventions in aging 8 (2013), 549--556.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Vimala Nunavath, Sahand Johansen, Tommy Sandtorv Johannessen, Lei Jiao, Bjørge Herman Hansen, Sveinung Berntsen, and Morten Goodwin. 2021. Deep Learning for Classifying Physical Activities from Accelerometer Data. Sensors 2021, Vol. 21, Page 5564 21, 16 (8 2021), 5564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Madhuri Panwar, S. Ram Dyuthi, K. Chandra Prakash, Dwaipayan Biswas, Amit Acharyya, Koushik Maharatna, Arvind Gautam, and Ganesh R. Naik. 2017. CNN based approach for activity recognition using a wrist-worn accelerometer. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS (9 2017), 2438--2441.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Charissa Ann Ronao and Sung Bae Cho. 2016. Human activity recognition with smartphone sensors using deep learning neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications 59 (10 2016), 235--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Emilio Sansano, Raúl Montoliu, and Óscar Belmonte Fernández. 2020. A study of deep neural networks for human activity recognition. Computational Intelligence 36, 3 (3 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Meng Shang, Yiyuan Zhang, Ahmed Youssef Ali Amer, Ine D'Haeseleer, and Bart Vanrumste. 2021. Bathroom activities monitoring for older adults by a wrist-mounted accelerometer using a hybrid deep learning model. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS (2021), 7112--7115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Y. E. Shin, W. H. Choi, and T. M. Shin. 2014. Physical activity recognition based on rotated acceleration data using quaternion in sedentary behavior: A preliminary study. 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2014 (11 2014), 4976--4978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Office for National Statistics. 2018. Living longer - Office for National Statistics. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wenchuan Wei, Keiko Kurita, Jilong Kuang, and Alex Gao. 2021. Real-Time Limb Motion Tracking with a Single IMU Sensor for Physical Therapy Exercises. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS (11 2021), 7152--7157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kieran Woodward and Eiman Kanjo. 2020. iFidgetCube: Tangible Fidgeting Interfaces (TFIs) to Monitor and Improve Mental Wellbeing. IEEE Sensors Journal (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kieran Woodward, Eiman Kanjo, David J. Brown, and T.M. McGinnity. 2021. Towards Personalised Mental Wellbeing Recognition On-Device using Transfer Learning "in the Wild". In IEEE International Smart Cities Conference 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kieran Woodward, Eiman Kanjo, Andreas Oikonomou, and Alan Chamberlain. 2020. LabelSens: enabling real-time sensor data labelling at the point of collection using an artificial intelligence-based approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 24, 5 (6 2020), 709--722.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. xsens. 2021. Xsens DOT User Manual. https://www.xsens.com/hubfs/Downloads/Manuals/XsensDOTUserManual.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A multi-sensor deep learning approach for complex daily living activity recognition

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DigiBiom '22: Proceedings of the 2022 Workshop on Emerging Devices for Digital Biomarkers
      July 2022
      38 pages
      ISBN:9781450394062
      DOI:10.1145/3539494

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 June 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate14of19submissions,74%

      Upcoming Conference

      MOBISYS '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader