skip to main content
10.1145/3532834.3536207acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Nachtalb: A multisensory Neurofeedback VR-Interface

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nachtalb is an immersive interface that enables brain-to-brain interaction using multisensory feedback. With the help of the g.tec Unicorn Hybrid Black brain-computer-interface (BCI), brain-activity-data is measured and translated visually with the Oculus Quest 2, tactilely with the bHaptics TactSuit and auditorily with 3D Sound. This intends to create a feedback loop that turns brain activity from data-input into sensory output which directly influences the brain activity data-input again.

References

  1. Emanuele Argento, George Papagiannakis, Eva Baka, Michail Maniadakis, Panos Trahanias, Michael Sfakianakis, and Ioannis Nestoros. 2017. Augmented Cognition via Brainwave Entrainment in Virtual Reality: An Open, Integrated Brain Augmentation in a Neuroscience System Approach. Augmented Human Research 2 (2017), 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Christian Breitwieser, Vera Kaiser, Christa Neuper, and Gernot R Müller-Putz. 2012. Stability and distribution of steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by vibro-tactile stimulation. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 50, 4 (2012), 347–357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Zitong Chen, Jing Liao, Jianqiao Chen, Chuyi Zhou, Fangbing Chai, Yang Wu, and Preben Hansen. 2021. Paint with Your Mind: Designing EEG-Based Interactive Installation for Traditional Chinese Artworks. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Judith Amores Fernandez, Anna Fusté, Robert Richer, and Pattie Maes. 2019. Deep Reality: An Underwater VR Experience to Promote Relaxation by Unconscious HR, EDA, and Brain Activity Biofeedback. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality (Los Angeles, California) (SIGGRAPH ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Yisi Liu, Olga Sourina, and Minh Khoa Nguyen. 2010. Real-Time EEG-Based Human Emotion Recognition and Visualization. In 2010 International Conference on Cyberworlds. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 262–269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Paul L. Nunez and Ramesh Srinivasan. 2006. Electric Fields of the Brain: The neurophysics of EEG. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Marc Parenthoen, Fred Murie, and Flavien Thery. 2015. The Sea is Your Mirror. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion in Games (Paris, France) (MIG ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 159–165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Roland Sigrist, Georg Rauter, Robert Riener, and Peter Wolf. 2013. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 20, 1 (2013), 21–53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ranganatha Sitaram and Tomas Ros. 2017. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 18, 2 (2017), 86–100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tom De Smedt and Lieven Menschaert. 2012. VALENCE: affective visualisation using EEG. Digital Creativity 23, 3-4 (2012), 272–277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Nina Sobell. 2002. Streaming the Brain. IEEE MultiMedia 9, 3 (2002), 4–9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eleftherios Triantafyllidis, Christopher Mcgreavy, Jiacheng Gu, and Zhibin Li. 2020. Study of Multimodal Interfaces and the Improvements on Teleoperation. IEEE Access 8(2020), 78213–78227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Bram van de Laar, Hayrettin Gürkök, Danny Plass-Oude Bos, Mannes Poel, and Anton Nijholt. 2013. Experiencing BCI Control in a Popular Computer Game. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 5, 2(2013), 176–184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGGRAPH '22: ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Immersive Pavilion
    July 2022
    33 pages
    ISBN:9781450393690
    DOI:10.1145/3532834

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 July 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGGRAPH '24
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format