skip to main content
10.1145/3516875.3516897acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Elementary School Students' Attitudes Towards Science Through Challenging Problem-Solving Tasks in the Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study aims to investigate the attitudes of elementary school students towards any challenging task of learning science, especially during the covid 19 pandemic. In this study, the attitude characteristics observed were general attitude towards ideas and information, attitudes related to the evaluation of ideas and information, a commitment to a particular scientific belief such as loyalty to truth. The research was quantitative research. The research participants were elementary school students in grades 4-6 who received science lessons as many as 96 male and female students. The technique of collecting data is by interviewing online or through filling out google forms and observing. Quantitative data is analyzed by quantitative description. The interview data analysis technique for attitude uses qualitative analysis, namely data collection, data reduction, data display, and drawing conclusions. Qualitative data analysis assisted by ATLAS ti 8 Windows software. The results of the phased study of student attitudes during the pandemic showed that most of the students' attitudes towards competitiveness were happy with challenging assignments but had to be with parental participation or guidance. As for students whose parents are less attentive, their attitude does not show a positive attitude and their learning outcomes are not good.

References

  1. Mulenga, E.M., Marban, J.S., (2020). Is COVID-19 the gateway for digital learning in Mathematics education? Contemp. Educ. Technol. 12 (2), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647. 2019.1663082.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chen, R. T.-H. (2010). Knowledge and knowers in online learning: Investigating the effects of online flexible learning on student sojourners. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia, Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4099&context=theses.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Akınoglu O, Tandogan RO (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., 3(1): 71-81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Arunkumar, J Jose Prabhu, S. Divya, V. Sangavi,S.Nandhini R. Prasanna,S. Prakash, (2018). Entrepreneurial attitude among management students: an empirical study, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kidman, G. (2009). Attitudes and interests towards biotechnology: the mismatch between teachers and students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5 (2), 135-143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Prokop, P., Leskova, A., Kubiatko, M. & Diran, C. (2007). Slovakian student's knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (7), 895- 907.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C.M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A.L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., Scala, A., (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.05004.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice: Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15430421tip4102_2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Silverman, A. (2020). Play, child development, and relationships: A preschool teacher in China shares her virtual teaching experience. Teaching Young Children, 13(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wie, S. H., Strohbehn, C. H., & Hsu, C. H. C. (1998). Iowa dietitians’ attitudes toward and knowledge of genetically engineered and irradiated foods. Journal of the American Di- etetic Association, 98(11), 1331–1333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Usak, M., Erdogan, M., Prokop, P. & Ozel, M. (2009). High school and university students' knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37(2), 123-130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Moerbeek, H., & Casimir, G. (2005). Gender differences in consumers’ acceptance of genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 308–318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Peker, M., & Mirasyedioglu, S. (2008). Preservice elementary school teachers’ learning styles and attitudes towards mathematics. Eurasian Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 21-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dawson, V. (2007). An exploration of high school (12–17 year old) students’ understandings of and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Research in Science Education, 37 (1), 59-73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Masek, A., & Yamin, S. 2012. The Impact of Instructional Methods on Critical Thinking: A Comparison of Problem-Based Learning and Conventional Approach in Engineering Education. ISRN Education, 2012, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/759241Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Elementary School Students' Attitudes Towards Science Through Challenging Problem-Solving Tasks in the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICLIQE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
      September 2021
      663 pages
      ISBN:9781450386920
      DOI:10.1145/3516875

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 July 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format