skip to main content
10.1145/3514197.3549613acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesivaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Increasing resilience and preventing suicide: training and interventions with a distressed virtual human in virtual reality

Published:06 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtual agents have been used as virtual patients for medical training, as well as for mental health training. When the training takes place inside VR the experience is more immersive, which allows for illusions of presence: the illusion that you are co-present with the virtual agent in the same space, and the illusion that the virtual agent is a real human. We have developed 'Daniel', a VR framework, based on a semi-automated virtual agent, which can be used for training for increasing resilience and for suicide prevention, and has the potential of being used as an intervention. Here we report on two different studies aimed at evaluating the framework and the psychological protocols involved. In the first study we trained participants from the general population to develop a resilience plan intervention (RPI) with a distressed virtual agent, and in the second study we trained therapists to use the safety plan intervention (SPI) with a suicidal virtual agent. In both cases we compare the VR sessions with role-playing by human actors. We report that all interventions resulted in an increase in participant self-efficacy in helping others, and we also report results on the possible importance of presence and social presence.

References

  1. Sharon Almaliah-Rauscher, Noa Ettinger, Yossi Levi-Belz, and Yari Gvion. 2020. "Will you treat me? I'm suicidal!" The effect of patient gender, suicidal severity, and therapist characteristics on the therapist's likelihood to treat a hypothetical suicidal patient. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 27, 3 (2020), 278--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hazel R. Atuel and Sara Kintzle. 2021. Comparing the training effectiveness of virtual reality and role play among future mental health providers. Psychol. Trauma Theory, Res. Pract. Policy (2021). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Albert Bandura. 2006. Guide to the construction of self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs Adolesc. 4, 1 (2006), 307--337.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shira Barzilay, Zimri S. Yaseen, Mariah Hawes, Bernard Gorman, Rachel Altman, Adriana Foster, Alan Apter, Paul Rosenfield, and Igor Galynker. 2018. Emotional responses to suicidal patients: Factor structure, construct, and predictive validity of the therapist response questionnaire-suicide form. Front. Psychiatry 9, APR (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Edwin D. Boudreaux, Barbara Stanley, Kelly L. Green, Hanga Galfalvy, and Gregory K. Brown. 2021. A randomized, controlled trial of the safety planning intervention: Research design and methods. Contemp. Clin. Trials 103, October 2020 (2021), 106291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gregory K. Brown, Thomas Ten Have, Gregg R. Henriques, Sharon X. Xie, Judd E. Hollander, and Aaron T. Beck. 2005. Cognitive Therapy for the Prevention of Suicide Attempts. Jama 294, 5 (2005), 563. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Olga Chernikova, Nicole Heitzmann, Matthias Stadler, Doris Holzberger, Tina Seidel, and Frank Fischer. 2020. Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 90, 4 (2020), 499--541. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mark É. Czeisler, Rashon I. Lane, Emiko Petrosky, Joshua F. Wiley, Aleta Christensen, Rashid Njai, Matthew D. Weaver, Rebecca Robbins, Elise R. Facer-Childs, Laura K. Barger, Charles A. Czeisler, Mark E. Howard, and Shantha M.W. Rajaratnam. 2020. Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic --- United States, June 24--30, 2020. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 69, 32 (2020), 1049--1057. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Rachel Ellaway, Terry Poulton, Uno Fors, James McGee, and Susan Albright. 2008. Building a virtual patient commons. Med. Teach. 30, 2 (2008), 170--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kim Gryglewicz, Maureen M. Monahan, Jason I. Chen, Melanie Bozzay, Ansley Bender, La Donna L. Gleason, Melissa Witmeier, and Marc S. Karver. 2020. Examining the effects of role play practice in enhancing clinical skills to assess and manage suicide risk. J. Ment. Heal. 29, 5 (2020), 549--557. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Amanda C. La Guardia, Jennifer Wright-Berryman, Robert J. Cramer, Andrea R. Kaniuka, and Kimberly Adams Tufts. 2021. Interprofessional Suicide Prevention Education. Crisis (2021). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Y. Gvion, H. Rozett, and T. Stern. 2021. Will you agree to treat a suicidal adolescent? A comparative study among mental health professionals. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 30, 4 (2021), 671--680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Wendy Hadley, Christopher Houck, Larry K. Brown, Josh S. Spitalnick, Mirtha Ferrer, and David Barker. 2019. Moving beyond Role-Play: Evaluating the Use of Virtual Reality to Teach Emotion Regulation for the Prevention of Adolescent Risk Behavior Within a Randomized Pilot Trial. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 44, 4 (2019), 425--435. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Judith Johnson, Alex M. Wood, Patricia Gooding, Peter J. Taylor, and Nicholas Tarrier. 2011. Resilience to suicidality: The buffering hypothesis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 31, 4 (2011), 563--591. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Prachi Kene, Elena T. Yee, and Katherine D. Gimmestad. 2019. Suicide assessment and treatment: Gaps between theory, research, and practice. Death Stud. 43, 3 (2019), 164--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Andrzej A. Kononowicz, Luke A. Woodham, Samuel Edelbring, Natalia Stathakarou, David Davies, Nakul Saxena, Lorainne Tudor Car, Jan Carlstedt-Duke, Josip Car, and Nabil Zary. 2019. Virtual patient simulations in health professions education: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, 7 (2019), 1--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Christa D. Labouliere, Barbara Stanley, Alison M. Lake, and Madelyn S. Gould. 2020. Safety Planning on Crisis Lines: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Perceived Helpfulness of a Brief Intervention to Mitigate Future Suicide Risk. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 50, 1 (2020), 29--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Glenn A. Melvin, Daniel Gresham, Susan Beaton, Jan Coles, Bruce J. Tonge, Michael S. Gordon, and Barbara Stanley. 2019. Evaluating the Feasibility and Effectiveness of an Australian Safety Planning Smartphone Application: A Pilot Study Within a Tertiary Mental Health Service. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 49, 3 (June 2019), 846--858. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Laurent Michaud, Kyle T. Greenway, Sylvie Corbeil, Céline Bourquin, and Stéphane Richard-Devantoy. 2021. Countertransference towards suicidal patients: a systematic review. Curr. Psychol. January (2021). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Catherine S. Oh, Jeremy N. Bailenson, and Gregory F. Welch. 2018. A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Front. Robot. AI 5, OCT (2018), 1--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mark S. Oordt, David A. Jobes, Vincent P. Fonseca, and Steven M. Schmidt. 2009. Training Mental Health Professionals to Assess and Manage Suicidal Behavior: Can Provider Confidence and Practice Behaviors be Altered? Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 39, 1 (2009), 21--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kyung Min Park, Jeonghun Ku, Soo Hee Choi, Hee Jeong Jang, Ji Yeon Park, Sun I. Kim, and Jae Jin Kim. 2011. A virtual reality application in role-plays of social skills training for schizophrenia: A randomized, controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 189, 2 (2011), 166--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sarah Parsons, Peter Mitchell, and Anne Leonard. 2005. Do adolescents with autistic spectrum disorders adhere to social conventions in virtual environments? Autism 9, 1 (2005), 95--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Larry D. Pruitt, Leidy S. Mcintosh, and Greg Reger. 2020. Suicide Safety Planning During a Pandemic: The Implications of COVID-19 on Coping with a Crisis. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 50, 3 (2020), 741--749. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Nicole Racine, Brae Anne McArthur, Jessica E. Cooke, Rachel Eirich, Jenney Zhu, and Sheri Madigan. 2021. Global Prevalence of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Children and Adolescents during COVID-19: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. (2021), 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sarah K. Hamill. 2010. Resilience and Self-Efficacy: the Importance of Efficacy Beliefs and Coping Mechanisms in Resilient Adolescents. Colgate Univ. J. Sci. 34, 2 (2010), 37--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. William M. Schmitz, Michael H. Allen, Barry N. Feldman, Nina J. Gutin, Danielle R. Jahn, Phillip M. Kleespies, Paul Quinnett, and Skip Simpson. 2012. Preventing suicide through improved training in suicide risk assessment and care: An american association of suicidology task force report addressing serious gaps in U.S. mental health training. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 42, 3 (2012), 292--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. L. Sher. 2019. Resilience as a focus of suicide research and prevention. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 140, 2 (2019), 169--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Mel Slater. 2009. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364, 1535 (2009), 3549--3557. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Samuel Y. Song, Beth Doll, and Kelly Marth. 2013. Classroom Resilience: Practical Assessment for Intervention. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Steven M. Southwick and Dennis S. Charney. 2012. The science of resilience: Implications for the prevention and treatment of depression. Science (80-.). 338, 6103 (2012), 79--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Barbara Stanley, Gregory Brown, David A. Brent, Karen Wells, Kim Poling, John Curry, Betsy D. Kennard, Ann Wagner, Mary F. Cwik, Anat Brunstein Klomek, Tina Goldstein, Benedetto Vitiello, Shannon Barnett, Stephanie Daniel, and Jennifer Hughes. 2009. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Suicide Prevention (CBT-SP): Treatment Model, Feasibility, and Acceptability. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 48, 10 (2009), 1005--1013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Barbara Stanley and Gregory K. Brown. 2012. Safety Planning Intervention: A Brief Intervention to Mitigate Suicide Risk. Cogn. Behav. Pract. 19, 2 (2012), 256--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Barbara Stanley, Gregory K. Brown, Glenn W. Currier, Chelsea Lyons, Megan Chesin, and Kerry L. Knox. 2015. Brief intervention and follow-up for suicidal patients with repeat emergency department visits enhances treatment engagement. Am. J. Public Health 105, 8 (2015), 1570--1572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Barbara Stanley, Kelly L. Green, Marjan Ghahramanlou-Holloway, Lisa A. Brenner, and Gregory K. Brown. 2017. The construct and measurement of suicide-related coping. Psychiatry Res. 258, August (2017), 189--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Asumi Takahashi, Hirokazu Tachikawa, Nobuaki Morita, Miyuki Aiba, Yuki Shiratori, Kiyotaka Nemoto, and Tetsuaki Arai. 2021. Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Self-Efficacy Scale (GKSES). Crisis 42, 2 (2021), 128--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Thomas Talbot and Albert "Skip" Rizzo. 2019. Virtual Human Standardized Patients for Clinical Training. March (2019), 387--405. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Micki Washburn, Danielle E. Parrish, and Patrick S. Bordnick. 2020. Virtual patient simulations for brief assessment of mental health disorders in integrated care settings. Soc. Work Ment. Health 18, 2 (2020), 121--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Bob G Witmer and Michael J Singer. 1994. Measuring Presence in Virtual_@BULLET Environments. October (1994).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Robert Wood and Albert Bandura. 1989. Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-Regulatory Mechanisms and Complex Decision Making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56, 3 (1989), 407--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Increasing resilience and preventing suicide: training and interventions with a distressed virtual human in virtual reality

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IVA '22: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
        September 2022
        234 pages
        ISBN:9781450392488
        DOI:10.1145/3514197
        • General Chairs:
        • Carlos Martinho,
        • João Dias,
        • Program Chairs:
        • Joana Campos,
        • Dirk Heylen

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 September 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        IVA '22 Paper Acceptance Rate21of51submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate53of196submissions,27%

        Upcoming Conference

        IVA '24
        ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
        September 16 - 19, 2024
        GLASGOW , United Kingdom

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader