skip to main content
10.1145/3511716.3511796acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Empirical Study on the Effect of Agricultural Industrialization Organization on the Quality of Agricultural Products Based on Factor Analysis and OLS Model

Published:28 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Based on the perspective of information asymmetry theory and transaction cost theory, this paper discusses the effect of agricultural industrialization organizations on the quality of agricultural products. Through the survey of litchi growers in Guangdong Province and surrounding areas, it designs indicators suitable for measuring litchi quality from the two dimensions of safety and texture, uses factor analysis, correlation analysis, OLS model to test the hypothesis proposed herein. The results show that: the involvement of agricultural industrialization organizations has played an important role in improving litchi quality of growers. Enlightenment: unified management and unified standards through industrial organization forms such as enterprises, cooperatives, and associations are an important way to implement large-scale production of litchi, strengthen respective advantages, share risks, seek mutual benefit and win-win results. Government departments should play a leading and propaganda role, provide financial and technical support, improve the service system for the industrialization of the litchi industry, cultivate leading litchi enterprises, and accelerate the development of professional litchi cooperatives, associations and other intermediary organizations to make them become standardized and competitive main market players.

References

  1. Cao Ying. Research on the Quality Evaluation of Fresh Litchi[D]. Zhejiang Normal University, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai Jianhua, Chen Yulin. Zheng Yongshan. Reflection on the "company + farmer" organization model [J] Ningxia Social Sciences, 2012(06):31-37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang Qian, Wang Shiquan, Li Binglong. Analysis of the impact of agricultural industrial organization on producer quality control: Empirical evidence from mutton sheep farmers in Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2016(03): 54-64, 81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, X., Ou, X., Dong, X., Yang, H., Ubaldo, C., Yue, X.-G. Impact of farmer organization forms on agricultural product quality from the perspective of technology adoption (2021) ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 92-99. DOI: 10.1145/3480571.3480586Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chen Xi, Tan Xiang, Ou Xiaoming. Is smallholder production an obstacle to ensuring food safety?——Based on the game analysis between participants[J]. Rural Economy, 2018(10): 23-29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng Yicai, Wang Fuhua, Luo Chong, Ma Ke, Wan Kai, Huang Jianxiang, Zhu Fuwei. Research on the Quality and Safety Control of Litchi Production and Circulation Process Based on HACCP[J]. Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, 2018(01):23-27,38 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hu Xinyan, Shen Zhongxu. A case study of contract governance of "company + farmer" type agricultural industrialization organization model[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2009(12): 83-86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang Zuhui, Wang Zusuo. Looking at the organization form of agricultural industrialization from the perspective of incomplete contracts [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2002 (03):28-31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ming Hui, Qi Yanbin, Deng Xin. Agricultural technical support, standardization of production behavior and improvement of agricultural product quality [J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2019(08): 11-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Minh Ha, N.M., Tuan Anh, P., Yue, X.-G., Hoang Phi Nam, N. The impact of tax avoidance on the value of listed firms in Vietnam (2021) Cogent Business and Management, 8 (1), art. no. 1930870. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1930870Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Shao, X.-F., Gouliamos, K., Luo, B.N.-F., Hamori, S., Satchell, S., Yue, X.-G., Qiu, J. Diversification and desynchronicity: An organizational portfolio perspective on corporate risk reduction (2020) Risks, 8 (2), art. no. 51. DOI: 10.3390/risks8020051Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shao, X.-F., Liu, W., Li, Y., Chaudhry, H.R., Yue, X.-G. Multistage implementation framework for smart supply chain management under industry 4.0 (2021) Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, art. no. 120354. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120354Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sheng Hong. Transaction and Division of Labor [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tan Xiang, Ou Xiaoming, Chen Mengrun. How are safe agricultural products produced? [J]. South China Journal of Economics, 2017 (05): 50-65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang Xulong, Zhou Jing. Information Ability, Cognition and the Change of Vegetable Farmers' Use of Pesticides——An Empirical Test Based on Vegetable Farmers' Data in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2016(05): 22-31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wu Chen, Wang Houjun. Relationship contract and agricultural product supply quality and safety: mathematical model and its inferences [J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2010, (05): 30-37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Xiong Xiaolei, Li Dong, Feng Ying, Zhang Zhuwen. Analysis of farmers' willingness to implement agricultural standardization in the process of agricultural modernization[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2015, 36(05):862-868.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yue Liuqing, Liu Yongmei. Research on the quality of agricultural products in the "company + farmer" model based on signal game [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(01):263-269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang Liu, Zhu Yuchun, Ren Yang. Influence of social capital and organizational support on performance of farmers' participation in the management and maintenance of small-scale farmland water conservancy [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(01):148-156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhong Wenjing, Zou Baoling, Luo Biliang. Food safety and farmers' production technology behavior selection[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2018(03): 16-27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhou Jiehong. Analysis of farmers’ vegetable quality and safety control behavior and its influencing factors: An empirical analysis based on 396 vegetable farmers in Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2006(11): 25-34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhong Zhen. Production organization mode, market transaction type and fresh milk quality and safety——An empirical analysis based on the overall quality and safety concept[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2011 (01): 13-23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Coase R.H. The Nature of the Firm[J]. Economics, 1937(04): 386-405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Caswell J. A.; Bredahl M. E. and Hooker N. H. How Quality Management Metasystems Are Affecting the Food Industiy[J]. Review of Agricultural Economics, 1998, 20(2):547-557.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Darby M. & Karni E. Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud[J]. Law and Economics. 1973, (16): 67-88Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Isabel Lambrecht. Understanding the Process of Agricultural Technology Adoption: Mineral Fertilizer in Eastern DR Congo[J]. World Development, 2014, 59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ishaq M, Li C, Ping Q. Food Safety Issues in China: An Insight into the Dairy Sector[J]. Journal of Animal & Veterinary Advances, 2014,13(12):719-727.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Julie A. Caswell, Mary E. Bredahl,Neal H. Hooker. How Quality Management Metasystems Are Affecting the Food Industry[J]. Review of Agricultural Economics, 1998,20(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lai WWK, Chiu DKW, Feng Z. A collaborative food safety service agent architecture with alerts and trust[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2013, 15(04):599-612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Mighell R L, Jones L A. Vertical coordination in agriculture. U.S. Department of Agriculture[J]. Economic Research Service, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelson P. Information and Consumer Behavior[J]. Journal of Political Economy. 1970, 78(2): 311-329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Oliver.Williamson. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism[M]. Free Press, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhumadillayeva, A., Orazbayev, B., Santeyeva, S., Dyussekeyev, K., Li, R.Y.M., Crabbe, M.J.C., Yue, X.-G. Models for oil refinery waste management using determined and fuzzy conditions (2020) Information (Switzerland), 11 (6), art. no. 299. DOI: 10.3390/INFO11060299Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EBIMCS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
    December 2021
    539 pages
    ISBN:9781450395687
    DOI:10.1145/3511716

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 March 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format