skip to main content
research-article

The randomized communication complexity of revenue maximization

Published:06 December 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We study the communication complexity of incentive compatible auction-protocols between a monopolist seller and a single buyer with a combinatorial valuation function over n items [Rubinstein and Zhao 2021]. Motivated by the fact that revenue-optimal auctions are randomized [Thanassoulis 2004; Manelli and Vincent 2010; Briest et al. 2010; Pavlov 2011; Hart and Reny 2015] (as well as by an open problem of Babaioff, Gonczarowski, and Nisan [Babaioff et al. 2017]), we focus on the randomized communication complexity of this problem (in contrast to most prior work on deterministic communication).

We design simple, incentive compatible, and revenue-optimal auction-protocols whose expected communication complexity is much (in fact infinitely) more efficient than their deterministic counterparts.

We also give nearly matching lower bounds on the expected communication complexity of approximately-revenue-optimal auctions. These results follow from a simple characterization of incentive compatible auction-protocols that allows us to prove lower bounds against randomized auction-protocols. In particular, our lower bounds give the first approximation-resistant, exponential separation between communication complexity of incentivizing vs implementing a Bayesian incentive compatible social choice rule, settling an open question of Fadel and Segal [Fadel and Segal 2009].

References

  1. Babaioff, M., Gonczarowski, Y. A., and Nisan, N. 2017. The menu-size complexity of revenue approximation. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2017, Montreal, QC, Canada, June 19-23, 2017. 869--877. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Briest, P., Chawla, S., Kleinberg, R., and Weinberg, S. M. 2010. Pricing randomized allocations. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2010, Austin, Texas, USA, January 17-19, 2010. 585--597. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cai, Y., Devanur, N., and Weinberg, S. M. 2016. A duality based unified approach to bayesian mechanism design. In Proceedings of the 48th ACM Conference on Theory of Computation(STOC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cai, Y. and Zhao, M. 2017. Simple mechanisms for subadditive buyers via duality. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2017, Montreal, QC, Canada, June 19-23, 2017. 170--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chawla, S. and Miller, J. B. 2016. Mechanism design for subadditive agents via an ex ante relaxation. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC '16, Maastricht, The Netherlands, July 24-28, 2016. 579--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chen, X., Diakonikolas, I., Orfanou, A., Paparas, D., Sun, X., and Yannakakis, M. 2015. On the complexity of optimal lottery pricing and randomized mechanisms. In IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2015, Berkeley, CA, USA, 17-20 October, 2015. 1464--1479. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chen, X., Diakonikolas, I., Paparas, D., Sun, X., and Yannakakis, M. 2014. The complexity of optimal multidimensional pricing. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2014, Portland, Oregon, USA, January 5-7, 2014. 1319--1328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., and Tzamos, C. 2014. The Complexity of Optimal Mechanism Design. In the 25th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., and Tzamos, C. 2017. Strong duality for a multiple-good monopolist. Econometrica 85, 3, 735--767. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dobzinski, S. 2016. Computational efficiency requires simple taxation. In FOCS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fadel, R. and Segal, I. 2009. The communication cost of selfishness. J. Econ. Theory 144, 5, 1895--1920.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Göös, M. and Rubinstein, A. 2018. Near-optimal communication lower bounds for approximate nash equilibria. In 59th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2018, Paris, France, October 7-9, 2018. 397--403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hart, S. and Nisan, N. 2019. Selling multiple correlated goods: Revenue maximization and menu-size complexity. J. Economic Theory 183, 991--1029.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hart, S. and Reny, P. J. 2015. Maximizing Revenue with Multiple Goods: Nonmonotonicity and Other Observations. Theoretical Economics 10, 3, 893--922.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Immorlica, N., Lucier, B., Mao, J., Syrgkanis, V., and Tzamos, C. 2018. Combinatorial assortment optimization. In Web and Internet Economics - 14th International Conference, WINE 2018, Oxford, UK, December 15-17, 2018, Proceedings, G. Christodoulou and T. Harks, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11316. Springer, 218--231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kothari, P., Mohan, D., Schvartzman, A., Singla, S., and Weinberg, S. M. 2019. Approximation schemes for a buyer with independent items via symmetries. In the 60th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Manelli, A. M. and Vincent, D. R. 2010. Bayesian and Dominant-Strrategy Implementation in the Independent Private-Values Model. Econometrica 78, 6, 1905--1938.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Papadimitriou, C. H., Schapira, M., and Singer, Y. 2008. On the hardness of being truthful. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pavlov, G. 2011. Optimal mechanism for selling two goods. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 11, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rubinstein, A. and Weinberg, S. M. 2018. Simple mechanisms for a subadditive buyer and applications to revenue monotonicity. ACM Trans. Economics and Comput. 6, 3-4, 19:1--19:25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rubinstein, A. and Zhao, J. 2021. The randomized communication complexity of randomized auctions. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. 882--895. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Thanassoulis, J. 2004. Haggling over substitutes. Journal of Economic Theory 117, 217--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The randomized communication complexity of revenue maximization
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGecom Exchanges
      ACM SIGecom Exchanges  Volume 19, Issue 2
      November 2021
      83 pages
      EISSN:1551-9031
      DOI:10.1145/3505156
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2021 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 December 2021

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader