skip to main content
10.1145/3501409.3501621acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DOA estimation method based on Redundant Array Optimization: The algorithm of extending from monostatic nested array to bistatic nested array

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The traditional algorithm does not make full use of the redundant virtual elements in the same position of the "difference array", which still contain a lot of target parameter information. In this paper, a new processing algorithm is proposed. The redundant virtual elements in the same position are summated, and then the average value is calculated. The average value of the same element position is used to replace the original value of only one virtual element in the same position, so that a virtual received signal which makes full use of the virtual redundant elements can be obtained. Then the music algorithm is used to estimate the spatial spectrum to get DOA. Then, the algorithm is extended from single base nested array to double base nested array. The simulation results show that the algorithm is effective in two kinds of array structures.

References

  1. CHEN C Y, VAIDYANATHAN P P. Minimum redundancy MIMO radars[C]//Proc. of the International Symposium on Circuits & Systems, 2008: 45--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. PAL P, VAIDYANATHAN P P. Nested arrays: a novel approach to array processing with enhanced degrees of freedom[J]. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2010, 58(8):4167--4181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. PAL P, VAIDYANATHAN P P. Coprime sampling and the MUSIC algorithm[C]//Proc. of the Digital Signal Processing Workshop and IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop (DSP/SPE), 2011: 289--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Pal P, Vaidyanathan P P. Nested Arrays: A Novel Approach to Array Processing With Enhanced Degrees of Freedom[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2010, 58(8):4167--4181.96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Pal P, Vaidyanathan P P. Multiple Level Nested Array: An Efficient Geometry for 2qth Order Cumulant Based Array Processing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2012, 60(3):1253--1269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. RABIDEAU D J, PARKER P. Ubiquitous MIMO multifunction digital array radar[C] // Proc. of the 37th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2003: 1058--1061.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Luo K, Manikas A. Superresolution Multitarget Parameter Estimation in MIMO Radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2013, 51(6 Part2):3683--3693.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Han K, Nehorai A. Improved Source Number Detection and Direction Estimation With Nested Arrays and ULAs Using Jackknifing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 61(23):6118--6128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gu J, Zhu W P, Swamy M. Joint 2-D DOA Estimation via Sparse L-shaped Array[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2015, 63(5):1171--1182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y Liao, Zhao R, Gao L. Joint DOD and DOA Estimation in Bistatic MIMO Radar With Distributed Nested Arrays[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7:50954--50961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Zheng G, Tang J. DOD and DOA estimation in bistatic MIMO radar for nested and coprime array with closed-form DOF[J]. International Journal of Electronics, 2016, 104(4-6):885--897.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmidt R, Schmidt R O. Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation, 1986, 34(3):276--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Shi J, Wen F, Liu T. Nested MIMO Radar: Coarrays, Tensor Modeling and Angle Estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2020, PP(99):1--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. ZHANG X, XU L, XU L, et al. Direction of departure (DOD) and direction of arrival (DOA) estimation in MIMO radar with reduced-dimension MUSIC[J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2010, 14(12): 1160--1163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Y Liao, Zhao R, Gao L. Joint DOD and DOA Estimation in Bistatic MIMO Radar With Distributed Nested Arrays[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7:50954--50961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. DOA estimation method based on Redundant Array Optimization: The algorithm of extending from monostatic nested array to bistatic nested array

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EITCE '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
      October 2021
      1723 pages
      ISBN:9781450384322
      DOI:10.1145/3501409

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 December 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EITCE '21 Paper Acceptance Rate294of531submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate508of972submissions,52%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader