skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3501912acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What is Your Current Mindset?

Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Is recommendation the new search? Recommender systems have shortened the search for information in everyday activities such as following the news, media, and shopping. In this paper, we address the challenges of capturing the situational needs of the user and linking them to the available datasets with the concept of Mindsets. Mindsets are categories such as “I’m hungry” and “Surprise me” designed to lead the users to explicitly state their intent, control the recommended content, save time, get inspired, and gain shortcuts for a satisficing exploration of POI recommendations. In our methodology, we first compiled Mindsets with a card sorting workshop and a formative evaluation. Using the insights gathered from potential end users, we then quantified Mindsets by linking them to POI utility measures using approximated lexicographic multi-objective optimisation. Finally, we ran a summative evaluation of Mindsets and derived guidelines for designing novel categories for recommender systems.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491102.3501912-talk-video.mp4

mp4

233.9 MB

References

  1. Gregory D. Abowd, Anind K. Dey, P. Brown, N. Davies, M. Smith, and Pete Steggles. 1999. Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness. In HUC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gediminas Adomavicius and Alexander Tuzhilin. 2011. Context-Aware Recommender Systems. Springer US, Boston, MA, 217–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. P. Aksenov, Astrid Kemperman, and T. Arentze. 2014. Tourists’ Dynamic Needs and Affects in Personalised Travel Route Recommendations. In UMAP Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Saleema Amershi, Maya Cakmak, William Bradley Knox, and Todd Kulesza. 2014. Power to the People: The Role of Humans in Interactive Machine Learning. AI Magazine 35, 4 (Dec. 2014), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v35i4.2513Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Alia Amin, Sian Townsend, Jacco van Ossenbruggen, and Lynda Hardman. 2009. Fancy a Drink in Canary Wharf?: A User Study on Location-Based Mobile Search. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2009, Tom Gross, Jan Gulliksen, Paula Kotzé, Lars Oestreicher, Philippe Palanque, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 736–749.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sarabjot Singh Anand and Bamshad Mobasher. 2007. From Web to Social Web: Discovering and Deploying User and Content Profiles. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Chapter Contextual Recommendation, 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74951-6_8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hiteshwar Kumar Azad and Akshay Deepak. 2019. Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: a survey. Information Processing & Management 56, 5 (2019), 1698–1735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jie Bao, Yu Zheng, David Wilkie, and Mohamed Mokbel. 2015. Recommendations in location-based social networks: a survey. GeoInformatica 19, 3 (2015), 525–565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Betim Berjani and Thorsten Strufe. 2011. A recommendation system for spots in location-based online social networks. In Proceedings of the 4th workshop on social network systems. ACM, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] Map Box.2010. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://www.mapbox.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. David J Brenes, Daniel Gayo-Avello, and Kilian Pérez-González. 2009. Survey and evaluation of query intent detection methods. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Web Search Click Data. 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nela Brown and Tony Stockman. 2013. Examining the Use of Thematic Analysis As a Tool for Informing Design of New Family Communication Technologies. In Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (London, UK) (BCS-HCI ’13). British Computer Society, Swinton, UK, UK, Article 21, 6 pages. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2578048.2578078Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Huanhuan Cao, Derek Hao Hu, Dou Shen, Daxin Jiang, Jian-Tao Sun, Enhong Chen, and Qiang Yang. 2009. Context-aware query classification. In Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 3–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Claudio Carpineto, Stefano Mizzaro, Giovanni Romano, and Matteo Snidero. 2009. Mobile information retrieval with search results clustering: Prototypes and evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Joseph Chee Chang, Nathan Hahn, Adam Perer, and Aniket Kittur. 2019. SearchLens: Composing and Capturing Complex User Interests for Exploratory Search. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Marina del Ray, California) (IUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302321Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Chen Cheng, Haiqin Yang, Irwin King, and Michael R Lyu. 2012. Fused matrix factorization with geographical and social influence in location-based social networks. In Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Keith Cheverst, Nigel Davies, Keith Mitchell, and Christos Efstratiou. 2001. Using Context as a Crystal Ball: Rewards and Pitfalls. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 5, 1 (Jan. 2001), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007790170020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Keith Cheverst, Nigel Davies, Keith Mitchell, and Adrian Friday. 2000. Experiences of Developing and Deploying a Context-Aware Tourist Guide: The GUIDE Project. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (MobiCom ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/345910.345916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Eloise Coupey, Julie R Irwin, and John W Payne. 1998. Product category familiarity and preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research 24, 4 (1998), 459–468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Paolo Cremonesi, Antonio Donatacci, Franca Garzotto, and Roberto Turrin. 2012. Decision-Making in Recommender Systems: The Role of User’s Goals and Bounded Resources.. In Decisions@ RecSys. Citeseer, 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Susan Dumais. 2013. Personalized Search: Potential and Pitfalls. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/personalized-search-potential-pitfalls/ NIPS 2013 Workshop on Personalization, Keynote Talk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Malin Eiband, Sarah Theres Völkel, Daniel Buschek, Sophia Cook, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2019. When People and Algorithms Meet: User-reported Problems in Intelligent Everyday Applications. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Marina del Ray, California) (IUI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302262Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mehdi Elahi, Matthias Braunhofer, Francesco Ricci, and Marko Tkalcic. 2013. Personality-Based Active Learning for Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. In AI*IA 2013: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Matteo Baldoni, Cristina Baroglio, Guido Boella, and Roberto Micalizio (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 360–371.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Michael TM Emmerich and André H Deutz. 2018. A tutorial on multiobjective optimization: fundamentals and evolutionary methods. Natural computing 17, 3 (2018), 585–609.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Laura Faulkner. 2003. Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc 35 (09 2003), 379–83. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195514Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Gregory Ference, Mao Ye, and Wang-Chien Lee. 2013. Location recommendation for out-of-town users in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 721–726.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. FourSquare. 2016. Foursquare Venue Category Hierarchy.Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://developer.foursquare.com/docs/build-with-foursquare/categories/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Huiji Gao, Jiliang Tang, Xia Hu, and Huan Liu. 2013. Exploring temporal effects for location recommendation on location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 93–100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Liqiang Geng and Howard J Hamilton. 2006. Interestingness measures for data mining: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 38, 3 (2006), 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jonna Häkkilä and Jani Mäntyjärvi. 2006. Developing Design Guidelines for Context-Aware Mobile Applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mobile Technology, Applications and Systems(Bangkok, Thailand) (Mobility ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 24–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1292331.1292358Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Marti Hearst. 2009. Search user interfaces. Cambridge university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Marti A. Hearst. 2006. Clustering Versus Faceted Categories for Information Exploration. Commun. ACM 49, 4 (April 2006), 59–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/1121949.1121983Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tomi Heimonen. 2008. Mobile findex: Facilitating information access in mobile web search with automatic result clustering. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2008 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomi Heimonen. 2015. Emerging Perspectives on the Design, Use, and Evaluation of Mobile and Handheld Devices.IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8583-3.ch004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Tobias Hesselmann, Stefan Flöring, and Marwin Schmitt. 2009. Stacked Half-Pie Menus: Navigating Nested Menus on Interactive Tabletops. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (Banff, Alberta, Canada) (ITS ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/1731903.1731936Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jian Hu, Gang Wang, Fred Lochovsky, Jian-tao Sun, and Zheng Chen. 2009. Understanding user’s query intent with wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. 471–480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Liesbeth Huybrechts, Cristiano Storni, Yanki Lee, Selina Schepers, Jessica Schoffelen, and Katrien Dreessen. 2014. Participation is Risky. Approaches to Joint Creative Processes (1 ed.). Vol. 13. Valiz; Amsterdam, Netherlands.$$Uhttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/257649$$DParticipation is Risky book details [freely available]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. [39] User Interviews.2015. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://www.userinterviews.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. [40] InVision.2011. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://www.invisionapp.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Rolf Jagerman, Ilya Markov, and Maarten de Rijke. 2019. When People Change Their Mind: Off-Policy Evaluation in Non-Stationary Recommendation Environments. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Melbourne VIC, Australia) (WSDM ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3290958Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Mohsen Jamali and Martin Ester. 2009. Trustwalker: a random walk model for combining trust-based and item-based recommendation. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 397–406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Mohsen Jamali and Martin Ester. 2010. A matrix factorization technique with trust propagation for recommendation in social networks. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 135–142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Shagun Jhaver, Yoni Karpfen, and Judd Antin. 2018. Algorithmic anxiety and coping strategies of Airbnb hosts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Ray Jiang, Silvia Chiappa, Tor Lattimore, András György, and Pushmeet Kohli. 2019. Degenerate Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Honolulu, HI, USA) (AIES ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Alita Joyce. 2019. NN/g Nielsen Norman Group’s Formative vs. Summative Evaluations. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/formative-vs-summative-evaluations/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Michael Jugovac and Dietmar Jannach. 2017. Interacting with Recommenders—Overview and Research Directions. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 7, 3, Article 10 (Sept. 2017), 46 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3001837Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Michael Jugovac, Ingrid Nunes, and Dietmar Jannach. 2018. Investigating the decision-making behavior of maximizers and satisficers in the presence of recommendations. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. 279–283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Claire Kayacik, Sherol Chen, Signe Noerly, Jess Holbrook, Adam Roberts, and Douglas Eck. 2019. Identifying the Intersections: User Experience + Research Scientist Collaboration in a Generative Machine Learning Interface. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article CS09, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Gloria Omale Kelly Blum. 2019. Gartner Predicts 80% of Marketers Will Abandon Personalization Efforts by 2025. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2019-12-02-gartner-predicts-80--of-marketers-will-abandon-personGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Yehuda Koren, Robert Bell, and Chris Volinsky. 2009. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer8(2009), 30–37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Hoyeop Lee, Jinbae Im, Seongwon Jang, Hyunsouk Cho, and Sehee Chung. 2019. MeLU: Meta-Learned User Preference Estimator for Cold-Start Recommendation. arxiv:1908.00413 [cs.IR]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Defu Lian, Cong Zhao, Xing Xie, Guangzhong Sun, Enhong Chen, and Yong Rui. 2014. GeoMF: joint geographical modeling and matrix factorization for point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 831–840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Xiao Lin, Hongjie Chen, Changhua Pei, Fei Sun, Xuanji Xiao, Hanxiao Sun, Yongfeng Zhang, Wenwu Ou, and Peng Jiang. 2019. A Pareto-efficient Algorithm for Multiple Objective Optimization in e-Commerce Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Copenhagen, Denmark) (RecSys ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3298689.3346998Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Qi Liu, Haiping Ma, Enhong Chen, and Hui Xiong. 2013. A survey of context-aware mobile recommendations. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 12 (03 2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622013500077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Yiding Liu, Tuan-Anh Nguyen Pham, Gao Cong, and Quan Yuan. 2017. An experimental evaluation of point-of-interest recommendation in location-based social networks. VLDB 10, 10 (2017), 1010–1021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Takashi Nicholas Maeda, Kota Tsubouchi, and Fujio Toriumi. 2017. Next Place Prediction in Unfamiliar Places Considering Contextual Factors. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (Redondo Beach, CA, USA) (SIGSPATIAL ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 76, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139958.3139970Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. [58] React Native.2015. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://reactnative.devGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Don Norman. 2009. Technology First, Needs Last.Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://jnd.org/technology_first_needs_last/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Ingrid Nunes and Dietmar Jannach. 2017. A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 27, 3 (2017), 393–444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Behrooz Omidvar-Tehrani. 2021. Interactive Region-of-Interest Discovery using Exploratory Feedback. arXiv e-prints (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Behrooz Omidvar-Tehrani, Sruthi Viswanathan, and Jean-Michel Renders. 2020. Interactive and Explainable Point-of-Interest Recommendation using Look-alike Groups. In SIGSPATIAL ’20: 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Seattle, WA, USA, November 3-6, 2020. ACM, 389–392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Antti Oulasvirta, Sakari Tamminen, Virpi Roto, and Jaana Kuorelahti. 2005. Interaction in 4-second Bursts: The Fragmented Nature of Attentional Resources in Mobile HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CHI ’05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 919–928. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055101Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Jeni Paay, Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B Skov, Per M Nielsen, and Jon Pearce. 2016. Discovering activities in your city using transitory search. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 387–393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Jeni Paay, Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B. Skov, Per M. Nielsen, and Jon Pearce. 2016. Discovering Activities in Your City Using Transitory Search. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Florence, Italy) (MobileHCI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935378Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Mark J Rentmeesters, Wei K Tsai, and Kwei-Jay Lin. 1996. A theory of lexicographic multi-criteria optimization. In Proceedings of ICECCS’96: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (held jointly with 6th CSESAW and 4th IEEE RTAW). IEEE, 76–79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira. 2011. Introduction to recommender systems handbook. In Recommender systems handbook. Springer, 1–35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Mario Rodriguez, Christian Posse, and Ethan Zhang. 2012. Multiple Objective Optimization in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Dublin, Ireland) (RecSys ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2365952.2365961Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Simon Schaffer. 1999. Enlightened automata.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Tobias Schnabel, Paul N. Bennett, Susan T. Dumais, and Thorsten Joachims. 2016. Using Shortlists to Support Decision Making and Improve Recommender System Performance. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (WWW ’16). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 987–997. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Barry Schwartz, Andrew Ward, John Monterosso, Sonja Lyubomirsky, Katherine White, and Darrin R Lehman. 2002. Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice.Journal of personality and social psychology 83, 5(2002), 1178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. [72] Elastic Search.2010. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://www.elastic.co/products/elasticsearchGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Julie Anne Séguin, Alec Scharff, and Kyle Pedersen. 2019. Triptech: A Method for Evaluating Early Design Concepts. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article CS24, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299061Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Dou Shen, Rong Pan, Jian-Tao Sun, Jeffrey Junfeng Pan, Kangheng Wu, Jie Yin, and Qiang Yang. 2006. Query enrichment for web-query classification. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 24, 3 (2006), 320–352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. [75] Sketch.2010. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://www.sketch.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Jonathan Strahl, Jaakko Peltonen, and Patrik Floréen. 2021. Directing and Combining Multiple Queries for Exploratory Search by Visual Interactive Intent Modeling. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021, Carmelo Ardito, Rosa Lanzilotti, Alessio Malizia, Helen Petrie, Antonio Piccinno, Giuseppe Desolda, and Kori Inkpen (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 514–535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Simone Stumpf, Vidya Rajaram, Lida Li, Margaret Burnett, Thomas Dietterich, Erin Sullivan, Russell Drummond, and Jonathan Herlocker. 2007. Toward Harnessing User Feedback for Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (IUI ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/1216295.1216316Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Yu Sun, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Yingzi Wang, Xing Xie, Kieran McDonald, and Rui Zhang. 2016. Contextual Intent Tracking for Personal Assistants. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (San Francisco, California, USA) (KDD ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939676Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. M. Tkalcic, A. Kosir, and Jurij F. Tasic. 2011. Affective recommender systems: The role of emotions in recommender systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Wataru Tsukahara and Nigel Ward. 2001. Responding to Subtle, Fleeting Changes in the User’s Internal State. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CHI ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365047Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Tuomas Vaittinen and David Mcgookin. 2018. Uncover: supporting city exploration with egocentric visualizations of location-based content. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 22, 4 (2018), 807–824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Sruthi Viswanathan, Cecile Boulard, Adrien Bruyat, and Antonietta Maria Grasso. 2022. Situational Recommender: Are You On the Spot, Refining Plans, or Just Bored?. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), April 29-May 5, 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501909Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Sruthi Viswanathan, Behrooz Omidvar-Tehrani, Adrien Bruyat, Frédéric Roulland, and Antonietta Maria Grasso. 2020. Designing Ambient Wanderer: Mobile Recommendations for Urban Exploration. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1405–1418. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395518Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Shoujin Wang, Longbing Cao, Yan Wang, Quan Z Sheng, Mehmet Orgun, and Defu Lian. 2019. A survey on session-based recommender systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.04864(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. WHO. 2020. Coronavirus. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirusGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Chauncey Wilson. 2013. Brainstorming and beyond: a user-centered design method. Newnes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Ben Wolford. 2018. Complete guide to GDPR compliance. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://gdpr.euGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Jed R. Wood and Larry E. Wood. 2008. Card Sorting: Current Practices and Beyond. J. Usability Studies 4, 1 (Nov. 2008), 1–6. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2835577.2835578Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Liang Xiang, Quan Yuan, Shiwan Zhao, Li Chen, Xiatian Zhang, Qing Yang, and Jimeng Sun. 2010. Temporal recommendation on graphs via long-and short-term preference fusion. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 723–732.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Dingqi Yang, Daqing Zhang, and Bingqing Qu. 2016. Participatory cultural mapping based on collective behavior data in location-based social networks. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 7, 3(2016), 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Dingqi Yang, Daqing Zhang, Vincent W Zheng, and Zhiyong Yu. 2014. Modeling user activity preference by leveraging user spatial temporal characteristics in LBSNs. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 45, 1(2014), 129–142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Mao Ye, Peifeng Yin, and Wang-Chien Lee. 2010. Location recommendation for location-based social networks. In SIGSPATIAL. ACM, 458–461.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Mao Ye, Peifeng Yin, Wang-Chien Lee, and Dik-Lun Lee. 2011. Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 325–334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Quan Yuan, Gao Cong, Zongyang Ma, Aixin Sun, and Nadia Magnenat Thalmann. 2013. Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 363–372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Jia-Dong Zhang, Chi-Yin Chow, and Yanhua Li. 2014. iGeoRec: A personalized and efficient geographical location recommendation framework. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 8, 5 (2014), 701–714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Zhiqian Zhang, Chenliang Li, Zhiyong Wu, Aixin Sun, Dengpan Ye, and Xiangyang Luo. 2019. NEXT: a neural network framework for next POI recommendation. Frontiers of Computer Science 14, 2 (Aug 2019), 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-018-8011-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Yong Zheng, Bamshad Mobasher, and Robin Burke. 2016. User-Oriented Context Suggestion. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization (Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada) (UMAP ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930238.2930252Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. [98] Zoom.2011. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://www.zoom.usGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. What is Your Current Mindset?

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                    April 2022
                    10459 pages
                    ISBN:9781450391573
                    DOI:10.1145/3491102

                    Copyright © 2022 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 28 April 2022

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • research-article
                    • Research
                    • Refereed limited

                    Acceptance Rates

                    Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

                    Upcoming Conference

                    CHI '24
                    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                    May 11 - 16, 2024
                    Honolulu , HI , USA

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader

                  HTML Format

                  View this article in HTML Format .

                  View HTML Format