skip to main content
10.1145/3489449.3490008acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroplopConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Some Patterns for Architecting Lectures

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 January 2022Publication History
First page image

References

  1. B.S. Bloom, M.D. Engelhart, E.J. Furst, W.H. Hill, D.R. Krathwohl. “Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain”. New York: David McKay Company-1956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Joshi P., Shukla S. (2019) Child Development and Education in the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction. In: Child Development and Education in the Twenty-First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9258-0_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-815614-X.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Webb, N. (August 1999). Research Monograph No. 18: “Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states.” Washington, D.C.: CCSSO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Webb, N. (1997). Research Monograph Number 6: “Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments on mathematics and science education”. Washington, D.C.: CCSSO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Webb, N. (March 28, 2002) “Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for four content areas”, unpublished paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hess, K., Jones, B.S., Carlock, D., & Walkup, J.R. (2009). Cognitive Rigor: Blending the strengths of Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's Depth-of-Knowledge to enhance classroom-level processes. [Technical Report]. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED517804).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hess’ Cognitive Rigor Matrix and Curricular Examples: Applying Webb's Depth-of-Knowledge Levels to Bloom's Cognitive Process Dimensions – English Language Arts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hurry J. (2004) Comparative Studies of Instructional Methods. In: Nunes T., Bryant P. (eds) Handbook of Children's Literacy. Springer, Dordrecht.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mikami A. (2009) Imitation Learning. In: Binder M.D., Hirokawa N., Windhorst U. (eds) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_2366Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ginty A.T. (2013) Classical Conditioning. In: Gellman M.D., Turner J.R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_448Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Siddharth Srivastava and Prabhakar T. V. 2020. Tradeoffs between Classical Conditioning, Learning by Imitation and Learning by Doing based on Lecture Architecture. In Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET 2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 58–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3395245.3396426Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. The Philosophy of John Dewey Edited by John J. McDermott, University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. The Essential Dewey: Volumes 1 and 2. Edited by Larry Hickman and Thomas Alexander, Indiana University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Andreea Vescan, "Does learning by doing have a positive impact on teaching model checking?", Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Education through Advanced Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (EASEAI 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 27-34, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. L. Anido, M. Llamas and M. J. Fernandez, "Internet-based learning by doing", IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 18, May 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Siddharth Srivastava, Shalini Lamba and T. V. Prabhakar, "Improving Learning by Imitation in Online Courses using Memorization, Learning by Doing and Lecture Architecture for Naive Programmers," 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Tartu, Estonia, 2020, pp. 198-200, doi: 10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00064.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. S. Srivastava, T.V. Prabhakar (2021) UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF MICRO-INTERROGATION FOR FRAMING ASSIGNMENT FREE MICRO-LECTURES, INTED2021 Proceedings, pp. 5169-5175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Coon, Dennis; Mitterer, John O. (2008). Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and Behavior.Cengage Learning. p. 220.ISBN 9780495599111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. David Weintrop and Uri Wilensky, "Comparing Block-Based and Text-Based Programming in High School Computer Science Classrooms", ACM Trans. Comput. Educ, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 25, October 2017, [online] Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3089799.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Siddharth Srivastava, Shalini Lamba and T. V. Prabhakar, "Lecture Breakup- A Strategy for Designing Pedagogically Effective Lectures for Online Education Systems," 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Tartu, Estonia, 2020, pp. 27-28, doi: 10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Siddharth Srivastava and T.V. Prabhakar, “MICD - A Framework for Designing Micro-Conclusions for Micro-Lectures”, R10HTC-2020 (accepted).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Siddharth Srivastava and T.V. Prabhakar, “Micro-prompt: A framework for designing external assignment free micro-lectures”, EDULEARN-2021 (accepted).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Vladoiu and Z. Constantinescu, "Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Education Community, Based on Discord," 2020 19th RoEduNet Conference: Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet), 2020, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/RoEduNet51892.2020.9324863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Z. Ping, L. Fudong and S. Zheng, "Thinking and Practice of Online Teaching under COVID-19 Epidemic," 2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Educational Informatization (CSEI), 2020, pp. 165-167, doi: 10.1109/CSEI50228.2020.9142533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Some Patterns for Architecting Lectures
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            EuroPLoP '21: Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs
            July 2021
            387 pages
            ISBN:9781450389976
            DOI:10.1145/3489449

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 January 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate216of354submissions,61%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format